Pillendreher wrote:bondom34 wrote:Really hope KD and Russ come back hungry.
This
andNaturalThunder wrote:it will mostly be buried and ignored the incredible amount of good luck and fortune they had all season long. I know every champion is lucky to some extent, but I can't recall an NBA champion in awhile being as fortunate as the Warriors were this year.
This.
The Thunder had to go through Grizzlies => Clippers => Spurs => Heat last year (if they'd made the finals). That's a combined SRS of 21,6
The Warriors had to go through Pels => Grizzlies => Rockets => Cavs this year. That's a combined SRS of 12,65.
That difference is the equivalent to the difference between the Wizards and the Knicks or 76ers this year. But sure, one of the best teams of all time.
"We're definitely a great team and a team that should go down in history as one of the best teams from top to bottom." Keep telling yourself that Curry.
I think a small part of me is a little jealous, because I know if/when we win a title we won't be nearly as fortunate as the Warriors were this year. I mean even if we somehow avoid the Warriors, Spurs, and/or Clippers in the playoffs next year, you know the Cavs won't be as decimated by injuries as they were this year.
I think the other thing that irks me is that people will now legitimately try and argue Curry > Durant because he has 1 MVP and 1 ring as his team's best player (in the same season) whereas Durant has 1 MVP and 0 rings. But I'd still take any version of 2012-2014 Durant over 2015 Curry. And yes, I'm biased, but I'm still not so sure I wouldn't take Westbrook in the playoffs over Curry. He would've destroyed Dellavedova's soul from jump if he had that luxury instead of being completely shutdown one game and only, very, sporadically good to great the next two games. Westbrook would've had no problem getting to the basket and destorying Dellevadova. Curry is a far superior shooter but I think Westbrook might be better than or on par with Curry in about every other aspect of the game. Or, maybe, I don' t know...I think they're even enough in my eyes that Curry is/would be better in certain matchups and Westbrook is/would be in certain matchups. For instance, had OKC replaced the Warriors this year in the Finals, and faced the exact same Cavs team, I think Westbrook would've owned Dellevadova badly enough that he would've won Finals MVP. Durant still would've got his, and put up good numbers 26-28 PPG, 7-8 RPG, 4-5 APG, but I could see Westbrook averaging something like 30 pts, 8 ast, and 7 reb on good efficiency because there's no way Delly is consistently keeping Westbrook in front of him the way he was able to keep Curry in front of him.