bwgood77 wrote:BOOGIE-MONSTER wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Actually the only reason I want Gay (not a huge fan of his) is because I am at least three deep at every position and one deep at SF. The good thing about Knight is that you have him locked in at $14 million for 4 years while similar players are getting outrageous contracts. The reason I had Goodwin and McLemore in it was because I thought Knight was more valuable being under contract. Gay can leave in a year. Goodwin you would have on restricted FA and he is a good passer who can get to the rim. Knight can play PG or SG. And if you wanted additional shooting, you can take John Jenkins who is better than most know.
I hear ya. How about greasing the wheels with a second round pick of yours. Knight/2nd for Gay. I need mclemore still as i dont have a proven dedicated SG besides him.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Well from my perspective Knight has more value because I have no illusions of this team sniffing the playoffs so giving up a guy under contract for 4 more years at a reasonable price for a guy that probably leaves in a year (I wouldn't probably re-sign him) doesn't make sense. The thing that helped was that I felt maybe McLemore comes along. Without him it doesn't make much sense at all for Phx. I figured Sacramento was more win now with Cousins and Knight is better than McLemore and can play pg or sg. I'd probably prefer Casspi and McLemore.
Well trying to keep this realistic thebkings wont be trading casspi.
If you wanna do the gay/ knight swap it'd benefit both our rosters. I think you talked me into that swap.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk