All 2000s Players: Discussion Thread

goober · Post #21 » by **goober** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:34 pm

dame, would you want to swap 6 for 16?

Tony Snell · Post #22 » by **Tony Snell** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:38 pm

parsnips33 wrote:
Tony Snell wrote:
parsnips33 wrote:Anyone want to trade up for #2?

I would

You've got a deal

Awesome. In this deep draft I think I'd prefer to have the 7 pick, but the allure of potentially building around a couple guys that I've never gotten before is too much to pass up.

damecurry · Post #23 » by **damecurry** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:02 pm

Goober wrote:dame, would you want to swap 6 for 16?

Um, yeah, there'll be someone I like at 6. I'll do that.

damecurry · Post #24 » by **damecurry** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:41 pm

Edited Draft Thread OP to reflect the two trades made.

Jory04 · Post #25 » by **Jory04** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:16 pm

Am I cool to kick this off?

Sent from my LG-LS993 using RealGM mobile app

damecurry · Post #26 » by **damecurry** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:22 pm

Tony Snell wrote:
parsnips33 wrote:
Tony Snell wrote:
I would

You've got a deal

Awesome. In this deep draft I think I'd prefer to have the 7 pick, but the allure of potentially building around a couple guys that I've never gotten before is too much to pass up.

You're up

goober · Post #27 » by **goober** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:32 pm

Square wrote: you are up in the draft

goober · Post #28 » by **goober** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:33 pm

Laimbeer wrote: you're up

Tony Snell · Post #29 » by **Tony Snell** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:39 pm

Wackbone wrote:

You are up

wackbone · Post #30 » by **wackbone** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:55 pm

damecurry wrote:Edited Draft Thread OP to reflect the two trades made.

Your pick

damecurry · Post #31 » by **damecurry** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:24 pm

Someone quote please im on phone

Post #32 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:26 pm

parsnips33 wrote:Anyone want to trade up for #2?

You're up.

parsnips33 · Post #33 » by **parsnips33** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:27 pm

I'm here, deciding between two guys. Is playing 62/82 games in a season enough for voters or would I get punished for that?

Post #34 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:29 pm

parsnips33 wrote:I'm here, deciding between two guys. Is playing 62/82 games in a season enough for voters or would I get punished for that?

It's enough for me.

goober · Post #35 » by **goober** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:30 pm

parsnips33 wrote:I'm here, deciding between two guys. Is playing 62/82 games in a season enough for voters or would I get punished for that?

i wouldn't hold you back for that

damecurry · Post #36 » by **damecurry** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:32 pm

parsnips33 wrote:I'm here, deciding between two guys. Is playing 62/82 games in a season enough for voters or would I get punished for that?

It's a touch low for me but its not a major concern. Especially if they played in the playoffs.

Post #37 » by **GeorgeMarcus** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 11:58 pm

Can somebody take my list por favor?

Post #38 » by **Fadeaway_J** » Sun Apr 30, 2017 12:02 am

SuperDario wrote:Can somebody take my list por favor?

OK.

Post #39 » by **Quotatious** » Sun Apr 30, 2017 9:17 am

Sorry for the hold-up guys.

Never built around Dirk before, this is gonna be fun. Also considered two other players, but they have a reputation as somewhat disappointing playoff performers, so I took Dirk over both of them.

Laimbeer · Post #40 » by **Laimbeer** » Sun Apr 30, 2017 1:04 pm

Have we ever done a 2000s draft like this one?