stevemcqueen1 wrote:I like Olynyk's skills but he looks painfully slow and deliberate to me.
+1
I'm not crazy about him. If you ask me McDermott is much better than Olynyk, whose main attribute is "tall".
Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33
stevemcqueen1 wrote:I like Olynyk's skills but he looks painfully slow and deliberate to me.
Ruzious wrote:It's like some players are mobile on offense and immobile on defense. They're athletic when it comes to scoring and stiff when it comes to defending. It's a conundrum.
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Nivek wrote:Interesting observations, Ruz. DX's describes him as having "excellent mobility" and says he moves his feet well for his size. But then says he lacks lateral quickness.
It'll be interesting to see what his combine numbers look like.
When I add in the age adjustment, he drops a few spots. Still a good YODA rating, though.
I think the DX scout was attempting to say that Olynyk moves well in transition. He can keep up and get to the rim on a fast break. However, he does not have the kind of lateral quickness needed to defend pick and roll. Olynyk does not hedge and recover well. He is a good offensive player but he's going to be a liability on defense. He doesn't play the passing lanes well or block shots well. So, he runs fast enough but he's not very agile or quick.
I wonder if he's just more motivated on offense when it comes to scoring? A lot of guys don't move well until somebody passes them the ball.
Ruzious wrote:Another really impressive game from Miami's improving sophomore Shane Larkin (son of Gary). Unfortunately, he's small, but he's becoming a special player with a great feel for making the right plays.
popper wrote:It's interesting when I look at potential centers on the draft boards a common denominator is "lack of post moves" ..... lack of "back to basket moves". Why is this so difficult for big men? It would seem to me you (1) get in position down low (2) prepare to execute a set pattern of necessary footwork (3) execute footwork and (4) fling the ball at the basket. I know I'm oversimplifying this but shouldn't they be learning 3 or 4 basic post moves in high school?
SUPERBALLMAN wrote:Ok, I really hope we get Otto Porter. 2OT win over UConn, Porter was again outstanding! Throughout the game, making plays, defending, getting steals, going for loose balls, playing smart & picking his spots with precision.
He's got it all, the total package. The mentality to lead in a way that promotes "team" like a Tim Duncan, at one point he made a hook shot over a defender in the low post the announcer referred to as Hakeem Olajuwan-esq. Down the stretch he drops an NBA 3, then follows that with a drive splitting 2 defenders for the game winning shot.
Upper Decker wrote:That ship has sailed, Nate. He's going top 5 for sure, perhaps top 3. Wiz need to address PG more than SF in the draft anyways.
Upper Decker wrote:That ship has sailed, Nate. He's going top 5 for sure, perhaps top 3. Wiz need to address PG more than SF in the draft anyways.
nate33 wrote:Upper Decker wrote:That ship has sailed, Nate. He's going top 5 for sure, perhaps top 3. Wiz need to address PG more than SF in the draft anyways.
You may be right. But for now, Draft Express has him 15th. NBAdraft.net has him at #7. Hoopsworld has him at #17. SportingNews has him #3. CBSSports has him at #8.
Overall, I think we will be in fairly good shape if we pick anywhere in the top 7 or so. I figure Zeller, McLemore, Smart definitely go in the top 7. At at least one or two among Lin, Shabazz and Bennett go in the top 7. I don't want any of them. That'll leave at least one of Noel, Porter or Oladipo available at #8. Those are the guys I want.
And we're probably going to pick 5th or 6th, not 8th.
The guy I really want at PG is Trey Burke. If he's available in the teens, we need to move heaven and earth to acquire a mid-first round pick and draft him.
Ruzious wrote:Yup, even if it means trading a future 1st.
I think Noel still goes #1, but there will be a very good front court player available with the Wiz pick. Bennett is still worth seeing how he does in measurements (particularly standing reach) and even how he impresses teams in workouts. He's a compelling talent - though I wonder if he's injured - based on his stats from the last 2 games.