nate33 wrote:LyricalRico wrote:Dat2U wrote:
Yep, locking up 3rd string vets on multi-year deals is just bad arithmetic. There's no long term benefit in this signing. Like you said, we can find borderline/marginal NBA players anywhere without having to pay them $15 mil.
Unless they see him as more than a 3rd string big? Maybe Mahinmi+Smith really does mean Gortat is on the move? Not sure what they'd be getting for him at this stage in the offseason, though.
If the plan is to trade Gortat, then this is a reload season and it makes no sense at all to sign any of these long term deals except Mahinmi's.
I'd actually respect EG if the plan was to sign Mahinmi and trade Gortat for picks/prospects. At least that's forward thinking for a window of opportunity 2 years down the road after this free agency madness settles. But if that were the plan, then we should have signed all the rest of our bench to 2-year deals.
I agree about the "Signing mid level talent to 3+ year deals" mind set. But that really only applies when the strategy is to get Cap space. The problem is that there is no way for us to do that with this core. As I've previously said, the only way to get a star to pair with our Core is a S&T for a UFA that wants to leave his current team, but the team wants to at least get something back.
Horford and Atlanta was a perfect example of this as Horford was leaving, but Atlanta wasnt aiming for capspace (They signed Dwight) so a Kanter for Horford trade become possible, but the KD situation squashed that.
I would assume the trade includes Gortat, 1 of Otto/Oubre/Sato, another cheap contract (Morris, Smith Nicholson), and maybe a pick. Gallinari, Ibaka and Blake Griffin come to mind next summer.
We could also make the trade for someone on an expiring contract, though they would require more in a trade than a UFA. Cousins and Favors would be my targets.
If either scenario occurs, we'll still be above the cap, so we need even more depth to compensate for the loss of 2-3 rotational players.