Moved from trade thread. Better to discuss here:
NatP4 wrote:...Both Kawhi and PG were players that scouts said couldn't handle the ball at all and could only straight line drive. People also said Paul George had low bbiq and would get lost on defense and lose his focus. I personally don't see the Kawhi comparison, but the PG one is close to me.
I did absolutely watch PG at Fresno, I was one of the people that said he was a future superstar even at that time(also said this about Jeff green lol)
The things that Oubre lacks, he will improve on through playing time, court vision, driving lanes to the basket. He's improved massively on defense, he doesn't get lost anymore at all.
But if you say he has a ceiling as high as Paul George but isn't a Paul George type player, I understand that. He's clearly more athletic than ariza, has a better ball handling foundation as well, has massive off the dribble upside, what is that player comparison then?
Not sure what the comparison is, but it sure isn't Paul George, who was a silky smooth player coming out of college.
Biggest thing to remember about Oubre is that he played a total of 700+ minutes of college ball! IOW, his experience in high-level organized basketball was really tiny on draft day. For that reason alone, it's hard to know who to compare him to -- it's hard to know who he's going to be!
Oubre has developed really well in a bunch of ways; especially his bbiq, control on court, etc. & those were legit. questions given the above. What he hasn't developed is any right hand at all. If he had an off hand, he'd really be a load to defend.
I did say he has a higher ceiling than Paul George -- but... I don't think PG is a superstar by any means. He's very good, but there a bunch of 3s who are better -- some way way better (including Otto Porter, btw).
How high is Oubre's ceiling? I.e. can
he be a star or superstar? Who the Hell knows? So far there's a lot to be happy about, & that's good enough.