Cassius wrote:HotelVitale wrote: It's very unlikely the Raptors would get anything close to Randle out of LAL. Lakers have enough cap space to sign Demar twice over, and he's UFA so matching isn't in the picture. The only thing teams get back in a situation like that is a second rounder or some small compensation, especially for someone for whom a 5-year max is already shaky.
I would think that the Lakers appeasing DeMar by getting him the 5th year would be enough to get more than a shoddy pick. Considering the deals Ujiri has already pulled off, on top of the ability to plug Simmons into that vacated spot, I think LA would be more likely to play ball.
Basically, either he takes the 5 from the Raps and the Lakers trade them Randle on December 9th or they just get the deal done today.
You're inventing an entire scenario to make that seem plausible. Would Derozan only want to sign a five-year deal? (The 4-year deal (with opt-outs) has been more popular the last couple years). Would the Lakers want a decent second banana badly enough to give him a full, new-cap max and give up their 21 year-old PF? Would Derozan really demand his new teams give up one of their better assets to give him that extra year? Especially when that means he'll get his next contract at age 31--which is a rough age to be looking for another 5 year deal?
We can debate what's realistic all day, all I can say is that a) I'd doubt that all of those things are true and b) there's no history of what you're proposing happening in the NBA (especially not for a very low-level all-star player like Derozan).
(Also, it's bad logic to think it's a good thing to dump Randle so Simmons can take his spot. He could fetch a late 1st or something if they really want to dump him--he's 21, on rookie scale for 2 more years, and played alright this season--and in any case nobody has any idea what Simmons will look like as a pro. Having a guy with positive value is never a bad thing, since by definition you can flip him for something you want, even if it's not much).