Shock Defeat wrote:How is Banchero "killing it" per the broadcaster when he has 17 points on 17 shots lmao.
He had a slow start and then started hitting his shots.
Moderators: Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake
Shock Defeat wrote:How is Banchero "killing it" per the broadcaster when he has 17 points on 17 shots lmao.
Shock Defeat wrote:How is Banchero "killing it" per the broadcaster when he has 17 points on 17 shots lmao.
Iwasawitness wrote:Donovan Mitchell has been nonexistent this entire game. He really needs to step up if Cleveland wants to get back into this game.
FrightCoward wrote:Shock Defeat wrote:How is Banchero "killing it" per the broadcaster when he has 17 points on 17 shots lmao.
Oh Jesus, here we go with the boxscore warriors again. He started off rough but has made 6 of his last 7 shots and has been doing everything else well. He’s played a strong first half.
Vampirate wrote:I'm going to be honest, based on the last 2 games I didn't see this score coming.
Iwasawitness wrote:BigDan245 wrote:Iwasawitness wrote:
This is a very odd statement to make.
Not really...The best unit in this series is the Magic defense. The worst unit is the Magic offense. They need their offense to just score enough to allow their defense to win these games.
If their defense is that good then why are they allowing the Cavaliers to score more? Don't get me wrong, the Magic have an elite defense. But you can't narrow this down to "If the Magic had a better offense, they'd be winning". Yeah, no ****. You can apply that logic to literally any playoff series.
Magic are down 0-2 because the Cavaliers have been the better team so far. In this game, through the first two quarters, the Magic have very clearly been better and already have 50 points with 5 minutes left. We'll see if this keeps up.
ChumboChappati wrote:I did not expect Cavs to be this soft
Vampirate wrote:I'm going to be honest, based on the last 2 games I didn't see this score coming.
thelead wrote:Vampirate wrote:I'm going to be honest, based on the last 2 games I didn't see this score coming.
I had the Magic in 6... and not feeling too bad about that prediction at the moment but a 16 point lead isn't insurmountable. We'll see how this one goes. That said, the magic did win 47 games... they are nowhere near as bad offensively as they were in game 1 and 2.
Exactly what happened in game 3 last season against the 5 seed Knicks.ChumboChappati wrote:I did not expect Cavs to be this soft
jbk1234 wrote:ChumboChappati wrote:I did not expect Cavs to be this soft
We're just missing shots, but Mobley and Mitchell look tired to me.
Vampirate wrote:thelead wrote:Vampirate wrote:I'm going to be honest, based on the last 2 games I didn't see this score coming.
I had the Magic in 6... and not feeling too bad about that prediction at the moment but a 16 point lead isn't insurmountable. We'll see how this one goes. That said, the magic did win 47 games... they are nowhere near as bad offensively as they were in game 1 and 2.
You must not think very highly of the Cavs if you still think your prediction is going to come true.
Logically the Cavs have fewer holes and have been here before, if your prediction comes through there's probably going to be some major changes on the Cavs roster come next season.
I'm speaking from a neutral standpoint here.
ChumboChappati wrote:jbk1234 wrote:ChumboChappati wrote:I did not expect Cavs to be this soft
We're just missing shots, but Mobley and Mitchell look tired to me.
Magic is not a good team. Cavs should be sweeping them.