MotownMadness wrote:Patsfan1081 wrote:nevetslc wrote:
This looks like JJ explaining the car kicking incident...
Magic is huge
They are all like "Word you said what?!"
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
MotownMadness wrote:Patsfan1081 wrote:nevetslc wrote:
This looks like JJ explaining the car kicking incident...
Magic is huge
Slava wrote:XtremeDunkz wrote:Boston34Bg wrote:
Maybe Ingram at the 2? Or he's too slow for that? Ingram is the physically weaker of the two, so on this alone, he'd probably be better at the 2, but I dunno how his foot speed will affect him there.
I don't see either of them being able to play the 2 in the long run. It would be an interesting scenario to keep track of if they pick him.
Ingram will be a PF as soon as he adds some bulk and Jackson is a SF.
zshawn10 wrote:[Woj Podcast] "Josh Jackson really has moved himself into consideration a little bit at #1".
Says that Jackson is in play every where in the top five, two GMs in the top 6 told him they think he's maybe the best player in the draft over Fultz, Lakers are super torn on him and Ball internally, and that the Celtics really like him but he didn't work out for them though there's still time for that to happen.
Starts at 55 min or so
Cornbread wrote:Slava wrote:XtremeDunkz wrote:I don't see either of them being able to play the 2 in the long run. It would be an interesting scenario to keep track of if they pick him.
Ingram will be a PF as soon as he adds some bulk and Jackson is a SF.
I don't see Ingram, with that frame, ever adding enough bulk to be a PF.
Slava wrote:XtremeDunkz wrote:Boston34Bg wrote:
Maybe Ingram at the 2? Or he's too slow for that? Ingram is the physically weaker of the two, so on this alone, he'd probably be better at the 2, but I dunno how his foot speed will affect him there.
I don't see either of them being able to play the 2 in the long run. It would be an interesting scenario to keep track of if they pick him.
Ingram will be a PF as soon as he adds some bulk
zshawn10 wrote:[Chad Ford] Lonzo ranked in Tier 1 among NBA scouts and executives. Category reserved for surefire All-Stars or franchise players. Only six other players ranked Tier 1 since 2009 -- Blake Griffin, John Wall, Anthony Davis, Andrew Wiggins, Embiid and Jabari ParkerSpoiler:
http://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/19602916/ranking-markelle-fultz-lonzo-ball-more-freshmen-tiers-2017-nba-draft
LofJ wrote:zshawn10 wrote:[Chad Ford] Lonzo ranked in Tier 1 among NBA scouts and executives. Category reserved for surefire All-Stars or franchise players. Only six other players ranked Tier 1 since 2009 -- Blake Griffin, John Wall, Anthony Davis, Andrew Wiggins, Embiid and Jabari ParkerSpoiler:
http://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/19602916/ranking-markelle-fultz-lonzo-ball-more-freshmen-tiers-2017-nba-draft
So was KAT tier 1 or not? If he wasn't that invalidates everything else. He had one of the most impressive freshman seasons ever and deserved that designation far more than Wiggins, Parker, and Embiid.
Snotbubbles wrote:LofJ wrote:zshawn10 wrote:[Chad Ford] Lonzo ranked in Tier 1 among NBA scouts and executives. Category reserved for surefire All-Stars or franchise players. Only six other players ranked Tier 1 since 2009 -- Blake Griffin, John Wall, Anthony Davis, Andrew Wiggins, Embiid and Jabari ParkerSpoiler:
http://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/19602916/ranking-markelle-fultz-lonzo-ball-more-freshmen-tiers-2017-nba-draft
So was KAT tier 1 or not? If he wasn't that invalidates everything else. He had one of the most impressive freshman seasons ever and deserved that designation far more than Wiggins, Parker, and Embiid.
Mis-quote by the poster. If you read the article is says this year Ball & Fultz are Tier 1. Last year Ben Simmons. The year before KAT. Then it goes on to list the others apart from those 4. Very poor writing.
Three other players -- Josh Jackson, De'Aaron Fox and Jayson Tatum -- received votes for Tier 1.
This is how it works: Both pieces are reported pieces. In other words, I talk with NBA scouts and executives to get a sense of:
• A. Which teams like which players (mock draft).
• B. What the consensus is among all 30 NBA teams about who the best players in the draft are (Big Board and Top 100).
To make sense of disparate rankings and debates over team needs versus best player available, the past few years I've chronicled a draft ranking system employed by several teams that have been very successful in the draft, what I call a tier system. Instead of developing an exact order from 1 to 60 of the best players in the draft, these teams group players, based on overall talent, into tiers. Then the teams rank the players in each tier based on team need.
This system allows teams to draft not only the best player available but also the player who best fits a team's individual needs.
So how does the tier system work? A team ranks players in each tier according to team need. So in Tier 3, if shooting guard is the biggest need, a shooting guard is ranked No. 1. If center is the biggest need, center is ranked No. 1.
bwgood77 wrote:Snotbubbles wrote:LofJ wrote:
So was KAT tier 1 or not? If he wasn't that invalidates everything else. He had one of the most impressive freshman seasons ever and deserved that designation far more than Wiggins, Parker, and Embiid.
Mis-quote by the poster. If you read the article is says this year Ball & Fultz are Tier 1. Last year Ben Simmons. The year before KAT. Then it goes on to list the others apart from those 4. Very poor writing.
You mean where it says this?Three other players -- Josh Jackson, De'Aaron Fox and Jayson Tatum -- received votes for Tier 1.
Last draft we had just one player in this category: Ben Simmons. The year before that, Karl-Anthony Towns was the only player here.
This category is usually reserved for guys who are surefire All-Stars or franchise players. Only six other players since we started this column in 2009 -- Blake Griffin, John Wall, Anthony Davis, Andrew Wiggins, Joel Embiid and Jabari Parker -- have been ranked in this slot.
Snotbubbles wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Snotbubbles wrote:
Mis-quote by the poster. If you read the article is says this year Ball & Fultz are Tier 1. Last year Ben Simmons. The year before KAT. Then it goes on to list the others apart from those 4. Very poor writing.
You mean where it says this?Three other players -- Josh Jackson, De'Aaron Fox and Jayson Tatum -- received votes for Tier 1.
No where he says this:Last draft we had just one player in this category: Ben Simmons. The year before that, Karl-Anthony Towns was the only player here.
This category is usually reserved for guys who are surefire All-Stars or franchise players. Only six other players since we started this column in 2009 -- Blake Griffin, John Wall, Anthony Davis, Andrew Wiggins, Joel Embiid and Jabari Parker -- have been ranked in this slot.
K P 6 wrote:Lakers would be dumb not to draft lonzo. If Boston didnt have IT I would say draft him as well.
JellosJigglin wrote:K P 6 wrote:Lakers would be dumb not to draft lonzo. If Boston didnt have IT I would say draft him as well.
Just going off analytics it would be a no brainer. But there are some concerns about whether he'd be able to play his game in the NBA effectively. I think he'd put butts in seats and that might be enough to push the Lakers over the fence.