HawaiianJazzFan wrote:If one more person says that sixers team is loaded with college stars... I'm going to go on a pimpslapping rampage. Seriously, like it was stated earlier without MCW and Noel, name one player who was a college superstar on the sixers... ONE. There aren't any... the sixers have done this on purpose... I even broke down every player that plays significant minutes for the sixers and their college careers earlier. Half of their team is full of undrafted players from the 2012 draft.
But they're on an "NBA team" now. Once your name is put on an NBA roster you automatically unlock skills and athleticism you never had before that allow you to dominate any and all college players. [/green]
My take? The idea that this Kentucky team would "handle" the Sixers is ridiculous. The idea that the Sixers would win 1000 out of 1000 times is equally ridiculous. The truth lies somewhere in the middle. This rhetoric the Sixers' scrubs would dominate solely by the virtue of being on an NBA roster is totally overblown.
There's a reason that rookies sometimes come into the NBA and look like incredible if flawed and unpolished players already. Because they are insanely talented and insanely gifted, on the level of NBA players. They are advanced for their age and competition level. Otherwise, every single rookie would look like overwhelmed unproductive garbage. You'd never see guys like Carmelo, Kyrie, Davis, Rose etc. producing like they did as 19-year olds. KG, Kobe, LeBron, etc. would have looked MISERABLE as 18-year olds. If you're in college, the cap to your abilities and potential impact on a game is not "the worst player in the NBA" i.e. Jakarr Sampson, Brandon Davies, etc. Simply repeating that overused rhetoric millions of times doesn't make it true.
I'm not saying that UK is stocked with those kinds of prospects that could produce in the NBA right now. I'm saying that dismissing the possibility that they would take a few games out of 100 as impossible based solely on them being a NCAA team and the Sixers being an NBA team is dumb. The talent gap is being severely overrated. It also belies the nature of basketball itself. A team of less talented guys can beat a team of more talented guys at any time IF the talent gap isn't massive and the less talented team gets lucky bounces aand heats up from the field.
And for what it's worth, I don't think any other NBA team would have a shot at losing to any college team. The Sixers are unique in that more than half of their current roster were just "guys" in college and went undrafted for a reason, more or less.