Warriors To Sign & Trade CJ Watson To Bulls For 2nd Rounder

Jordan45822 · Post #1 » by **Jordan45822** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:47 am

# Bulls will give up worst of their two second-round picks. @AlexKennedyNBA has it first about C.J. Watson to Chicago, far as I can tell. 5 minutes ago via TweetDeck

# C.J. Watson going to Chicago in a sign-and-trade for second-round pick. 12 minutes ago via TweetDeck

thetofuroom · Post #2 » by **thetofuroom** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:49 am

About time. Now maybe the Dubs will try and scope up Patty Mills or that Taiwanese guy.

ahonui06 · Post #3 » by **ahonui06** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:51 am

Bulls got a nice backup PG for Derrick Rose. Will definitely be better than Pargo or Acie Law.

Aaron Brooks · Post #4 » by **Aaron Brooks** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:54 am

ahonui06 wrote:Bulls got a nice backup PG for Derrick Rose. Will definitely be better than Pargo or Acie Law.

Watson is a small forward bro

SUN · Post #5 » by **SUN** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:56 am

Aaron Brooks wrote:
ahonui06 wrote:Bulls got a nice backup PG for Derrick Rose. Will definitely be better than Pargo or Acie Law.

Watson is a small forward bro

He's a shooting guard, amigo.

Post #6 » by **kingkirk** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:57 am

I am happy with this as a Bulls fan. Think he will be a nice back up.

shmoosicle · Post #7 » by **shmoosicle** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:58 am

Why are the Warriors just throwing away Watson? I thought they let Morrow walk so they could keep Watson.

kwamebargnani · Post #8 » by **kwamebargnani** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:02 am

SUN wrote:
Aaron Brooks wrote:
ahonui06 wrote:Bulls got a nice backup PG for Derrick Rose. Will definitely be better than Pargo or Acie Law.

Watson is a small forward bro

He's a shooting guard, amigo.

green font means sarcasm.

BULLS333 · Post #9 » by **BULLS333** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:03 am

shuusshhhhh go bullsss keep it coming were going deep

SUN · Post #10 » by **SUN** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:08 am

green font means sarcasm.

Oh my bad, I'm not familiar with the RealGM lingo.

NADALbULLS · Post #11 » by **NADALbULLS** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:10 am

This guy Watson has very good 47FG% last season and decent from trey (35% career), 1.6 steals per game. Seem likes all our role-players have very good offense, and good steals per game too. We sure know how to sign quality role-players!

iBall101 · Post #12 » by **iBall101** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:11 am

BULLS WILL BE A PROBLEM THIS YEAR......... oh my! Top 6 Finish Easily in the East now

NADALbULLS · Post #13 » by **NADALbULLS** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:11 am

More like top 3 or 4.

supaflash · Post #14 » by **supaflash** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:15 am

That kid is a nice talent, I really thought he'd get a decent offer this year and that GS would try to match. I guess GS not matching stuff is expected with the sale happening, but his lack of offers kinda throws me a little. I'd take him over Ridnour, Blake, Duhon, Farmar any day of the week and those guys all got decent contracts...

Gus McCrae · Post #15 » by **Gus McCrae** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:17 am

better than Murray

Gus McCrae · Post #16 » by **Gus McCrae** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:18 am

supaflash wrote:That kid is a nice talent, I really thought he'd get a decent offer this year and that GS would try to match. I guess GS not matching stuff is expected with the sale happening, but his lack of offers kinda throws me a little. I'd take him over Ridnour, Blake, Duhon, Farmar any day of the week and those guys all got decent contracts...

depends what you're looking for.

SApuro_ · Post #17 » by **SApuro_** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:19 am

Solid pick up.

rocketsballin · Post #18 » by **rocketsballin** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:28 am

he's solid for a backup 1 and can play some 2, bulls keep making good moves

demens · Post #19 » by **demens** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:30 am

I'm really digging how the Bulls went about their off-season. I think they have a decent shot at contending, they definitely built a TEAM, unlike some, lets home all the peaces gel nicely.

AgEnT50 · Post #20 » by **AgEnT50** » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:33 am

for how much?