Sik Infant wrote:
I've seen you in a decent amount and no I'm not attacking you and my argument is sound.
I rarely post on the GB, so now I know your B-Sing, just like the rest of your argument.
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
Sik Infant wrote:
I've seen you in a decent amount and no I'm not attacking you and my argument is sound.
mrblunt wrote:Sik Infant wrote:I think it's funny how people are 'experts' on the Bobcats but obviously don't watch them play.
There's a reason we don't watch them play. They are a horrible team to watch. Who wants to watch Kemba jack up shots, or Mullens trying to be Dirk. You act if Biyombo is a Mutumbo type player who in all honestly wasn't that great. Henderson has made strides but he's an average player at best, and most likely a good bench player. Bobcats have some of the worst eye for talent. They even brought in huge busts like Kwame Brown and Tyrus Thomas to their team. Their team is full of horrible shooters and no leaders. They are doomed until they can find a special player to build around, and right now they have none. I'll take Monroe's future any day of the week over Bobcats roster entirely.
princeofpalace wrote:Sik Infant wrote:
I've seen you in a decent amount and no I'm not attacking you and my argument is sound.
I rarely post on the GB, so now I know your B-Sing, just like the rest of your argument.
Johnlac1 wrote:I'm not a fan of either team, but after seeing both play a fair amount of times through League Pass, at this juncture, the Pistons are obviously more talented. But they're also better coached. With a better coach, the Bobcats might have won about five more games. Watching the Bobcat's stagnant offense is offensive. The Bobcats do have a lot of very young players with promise. Henderson, Mullens, and Walker all average double figures or close to it. Some of their other players are young and not without potential. Biyombo is only 19, but has had some impressive (though rare) outings. So let's say they either don't get Davis or their no. 1 refuses to play next year. The Bobcats have to go with the same players they have this year. How many games do they win? About 20-25. That's assuming that all their young players improve a minimal amount from now until next season which is in the realm of possibility. (I'm also assuming they get a better coach) With Davis, they might win 30-35 games. So how about the year after that with the present crew? Again without acquiring a top talent, they'll be mired near the bottom for an indefinite period of time. The Pistons have more talent and are a little better coached. Getting Davis and having a frontline with Davis and Monroe might be enough to get the Pistons in the playoffs. They'd still need another top flight player to contend for the title.
Sik Infant wrote:MaceCase wrote:Best case scenario?
Anthony Davis and Biyombo are a lottery team again next year because a team still needs to be able to score the ball and who exactly is doing that in Charlotte?
Anthony Davis and Greg Monroe (and let's not **** kid ourselves as if the Pistons don't have a good shot at him too) is a playoff team next year because that is a perfectly balanced frontcourt.
Hell, the Pistons can end up with any number of picks outside of #1 to pair guys like Drummond, Robinson, Jones III, Jones, even Henson with Monroe and be on the cusp of a brighter future. The Bobcats are **** with anyone but Davis. Not good odds.
People try to use the Bobcats being in the lottery as a knock but what do they think they're doing, the best case scenario for Charlotte is to be in the high lottery next year.
No knock but what's the best case scenario for Atlanta? Would you rather be you guys than us?
I would bet my kidney that we will win a title before you guys.
MaceCase wrote:Sik Infant wrote:MaceCase wrote:Best case scenario?
Anthony Davis and Biyombo are a lottery team again next year because a team still needs to be able to score the ball and who exactly is doing that in Charlotte?
Anthony Davis and Greg Monroe (and let's not **** kid ourselves as if the Pistons don't have a good shot at him too) is a playoff team next year because that is a perfectly balanced frontcourt.
Hell, the Pistons can end up with any number of picks outside of #1 to pair guys like Drummond, Robinson, Jones III, Jones, even Henson with Monroe and be on the cusp of a brighter future. The Bobcats are **** with anyone but Davis. Not good odds.
People try to use the Bobcats being in the lottery as a knock but what do they think they're doing, the best case scenario for Charlotte is to be in the high lottery next year.
No knock but what's the best case scenario for Atlanta? Would you rather be you guys than us?
I would bet my kidney that we will win a title before you guys.
Really, more baseless pot shots? I'd give an actually credible argument about how multiple teams having multiple lotto picks over years but none ever being or having the potential to be franchise changers, how Atlanta actually has multiple tradeable assets and upcoming capspace, is currently missing an All NBA-All Star and yet is still in competition for a top seed in the East, blah, blah, blah but I guess all that will be wasted on your emotions so I'll just go with
"too bad your liver will be destroyed over you drinking yourself to death following the Bobcats."
Johnlac1 wrote:I'm not a fan of either team, but after seeing both play a fair amount of times through League Pass, at this juncture, the Pistons are obviously more talented. But they're also better coached. With a better coach, the Bobcats might have won about five more games. Watching the Bobcat's stagnant offense is offensive. The Bobcats do have a lot of very young players with promise. Henderson, Mullens, and Walker all average double figures or close to it. Some of their other players are young and not without potential. Biyombo is only 19, but has had some impressive (though rare) outings. So let's say they either don't get Davis or their no. 1 refuses to play next year. The Bobcats have to go with the same players they have this year. How many games do they win? About 20-25. That's assuming that all their young players improve a minimal amount from now until next season which is in the realm of possibility. (I'm also assuming they get a better coach) With Davis, they might win 30-35 games. So how about the year after that with the present crew? Again without acquiring a top talent, they'll be mired near the bottom for an indefinite period of time. The Pistons have more talent and are a little better coached. Getting Davis and having a frontline with Davis and Monroe might be enough to get the Pistons in the playoffs. They'd still need another top flight player to contend for the title.
bstein14 wrote:Joe Dumars has proven he can build a winner.
Stun704 wrote:darth_federer wrote:I agree. Both teams need to improve internally or they are going to keep overpaying roleplayers.
Since getting Rich Cho we haven't overpaid anyone actually we've been very conservative.
ComboGuardCity wrote:This thread has it all. A bobcat fan saying he's glad his team isn't the playoff bound Atlanta hawk. The human pylon being called a defensive anchor. Gerald Kobe Henderson being an elite defender. Happy treadmill walkers.
If you had a motivated defensive anchor and a motivatedpremier perimeter defender you don't lose that many games unless they get no help.
Pimpwerx wrote:I was a fan of the Lakers...Yankees... It took me almost a decade to become a fan of the Miami teams...I know it's frowned upon, but if you can look at it as an outsider, it's easier to understand why it happens. PEACE.