Is that why Chris Paul was swept this year? You'd think that if he's a superstar, he could at least pull off one win? Or that he'd score more than 17 points 8 assists if his team needed him to win 4 games in a row? Yeah, he can obviously be relied on to carry a team, he can obviously close. That's why the Clippers were swept..... even with Griffin? It's not like he doesn't have players to assist to.
Chris Paul is a superstar just as much as Chris Bosh is. He's been outplayed this year's playoffs by Westbrook, Parker, Rondo, and the little time Rose played, he made a significantly bigger impact (Bulls fell over without him).
Westbrook (easily had the best year of all PG's) is so far ahead of Paul right now it's not even funny, and I don't like Westbrook. I'm just stating the truth.[/quote]
So shaq wasn't a superstar in the 90's when he got swept literally ever year? Your basically saying he's not a superstar because he got swept by the best team in basketball.
As for impact, the clippers were 32-50 last year and with Paul they have the best winning percentage in franchise history, and went from the 22nd ranked offense to Number 3 this year. With the limited training camp, Injuries, and shortened season,They did FAR better in year one then anyone expected.[/quote]
are you seriously stating: Chris Paul = Shaq?!?!?!?
Shaq made the Finals and a couple of ECFs, Paul hasn't, but your ridiculousness is amusing
[/quote]
Where did I say Chris Paul= shaq?
The argument was
"if you get swept, you're not a superstar" so by that logic shaq wasn't a superstar... Right?