teamgrizz wrote:
Fair enough, wasn't trying to question your fanhood, just that the Calderon idea was maybe a result of the Spanish in you and wanted to bust your chops a little. But I just have serious doubts on Calderon, who knows, maybe I'm just being biased by the Toronto fans.
But I think you're right that we need a perimeter option that can theoretically do what you're saying Calderon can do. As an example, Greivis Vazquez was huge for us in spots back when he was on the team, so I think you're definitely on to something. But you need something more solid and consistent than that if you're dumping Gay entirely and still hoping to be a contender, because you need that perimeter threat that can really stabilize or take over the offense for extended periods of time when the post isn't working. Gay has shown he can do that.