princeofpalace wrote:Detroit and New Orleans are the only one of these teams that have a guy that has the potential to be dominant, so its between them IMO.
Kyrie does not have the potential to be dominant?... don't tell him that.
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
princeofpalace wrote:Detroit and New Orleans are the only one of these teams that have a guy that has the potential to be dominant, so its between them IMO.
B Mac wrote:Saciid11 wrote:Pistons have the brightest future out of all the bottom feeders...
C- Drummond
PF- Monroe .
SF- ?? ... Prince
SG--??? They have top 10 pick this year
PG - Knight
Well, the Cavs have something to say about that:
PG - Irving
SG - Waiters
SF - ?? ... Gee
PF - Thompson
C - Zeller / Varejao
They have 4 first round picks in the next two drafts with at least one of them being a top 3 pick. They have more second round picks to use as trade assets then can even be counted. Plus, they will have room for not one, but TWO max free agents in the summer of 2014.
How about this scenario:
PG - Irving/Waiters
SG - Muhammed/Waiters
SF - James/Gee
PF - Bosh/Thompson
C - Zeller/Varejao
Add in 3 more first rounders to fill out the bench...
Heck you could even take out the James and Bosh pipedream and that team is solid as could be.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
mcfly1204 wrote:princeofpalace wrote:Detroit and New Orleans are the only one of these teams that have a guy that has the potential to be dominant, so its between them IMO.
Kyrie does not have the potential to be dominant?... don't tell him that.
princeofpalace wrote:mcfly1204 wrote:princeofpalace wrote:Detroit and New Orleans are the only one of these teams that have a guy that has the potential to be dominant, so its between them IMO.
Kyrie does not have the potential to be dominant?... don't tell him that.
No. He clearly does not. Can you really say that Irving will make a better PG than Chris Paul, or Derrick Rose? And, do you consider those guys dominant? Because I sure as heck dont
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Illmatic21 wrote:Volume scoring =/= "dominant".. you have to do more than score a lot of points to be considered dominant.
I don't know if I would use "dominant" to describe CP3, but he definitely dominates the pace of the game when he's at his best. Rose is a dominant presence on the floor with his ability to get anywhere he wants on the court and dictate the way defense's react. Right now, Irving is a dominant scorer, but he doesn't control the pace of the game and his little to no impact defensively. Some of the Kyrie hype is getting out of hand.
nhh90 wrote:Cleaveland. They are the only one with a top 20 player
Ronito wrote:Illmatic21 wrote:Volume scoring =/= "dominant".. you have to do more than score a lot of points to be considered dominant.
I don't know if I would use "dominant" to describe CP3, but he definitely dominates the pace of the game when he's at his best. Rose is a dominant presence on the floor with his ability to get anywhere he wants on the court and dictate the way defense's react. Right now, Irving is a dominant scorer, but he doesn't control the pace of the game and his little to no impact defensively. Some of the Kyrie hype is getting out of hand.
What point guard has tremendous impact defensively?
Ronito wrote:Illmatic21 wrote:Volume scoring =/= "dominant".. you have to do more than score a lot of points to be considered dominant.
I don't know if I would use "dominant" to describe CP3, but he definitely dominates the pace of the game when he's at his best. Rose is a dominant presence on the floor with his ability to get anywhere he wants on the court and dictate the way defense's react. Right now, Irving is a dominant scorer, but he doesn't control the pace of the game and his little to no impact defensively. Some of the Kyrie hype is getting out of hand.
What point guard has tremendous impact defensively?
ChrisTheFuturePaul wrote:I love watching the Hornets play lately. I checked out Cleveland Vs Sacramento the other day and both teams play trash offense. The Hornets not only have young talent equal or surpassing the others on the list, they also have a good chemistry and good team offense / defense.
If they can get an upgrade at SF or C this offseason they'll be in the playoffs next year.
SargentBargs101 wrote:CB-Blazer wrote:what the heck is an Ebanks?
The remote delivery of new and traditional banking products and services through electronic delivery channels. There you go bud