Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden?

Moderators: Morten Jensen, Blame Rasho, magnumt, tsherkin, Flash3, UGA Hayes, Yuri Vaultin, Mark K, Doctor MJ, NO-KG-AI

User avatar
KingzAndQueenz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,611
And1: 127
Joined: Feb 22, 2012
 

Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#1 » by KingzAndQueenz » Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:50 am

I say no. Unless Harden could be satisfied being a 3rd option, I don't see how he would really make them better. It seems Westbrook has finally relinquished control to Durant. End game, he gives the ball to Durant and gets out of the way. It seems the Thunder are even better this year than last.

Anyone think differently?
BBall Loyalty
Starter
Posts: 2,029
And1: 2,149
Joined: Aug 29, 2012

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#2 » by BBall Loyalty » Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:51 am

Yes because Harden is better than Martin.

and he was okay with being the 3rd option
User avatar
twinthunder3
Starter
Posts: 2,442
And1: 44
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#3 » by twinthunder3 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:51 am

Their bench would. Other than that, Kevin Martin is a suitable replacement, but he's no franchise player.
User avatar
fallacy
RealGM
Posts: 10,416
And1: 517
Joined: Jan 11, 2010
       

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#4 » by fallacy » Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:53 am

yes, slightly. Just because Harden is better than Martin, but Harden can't be utilized in OKC. Martin fits better with the starters, but not the bench. OKC has one of the best offenses in the last 15 years, so I can't complain too much. Also the defense has been much better without Harden, whatever the reason.
**** Ron Artest
**** Marco Belinelli
Stephen Jackson aint bout dis lyfe
Patrick Beverly deserves to have his knee ripped to pieces
User avatar
TwentyOne920
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,679
And1: 128
Joined: Jun 29, 2012

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#5 » by TwentyOne920 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:53 am

Well, they'd be better, but would it allow Durant to try and work on being a playmaker?

Westbrook had fewer assists last season because he handled the ball less in crunch time.
bertrob wrote:Any casual fan saying anything about Tim Duncan is usually wrong


bobly wrote:Kobe locked up his All Defensive Team this year after he blocked Lebron in the all-star game.
User avatar
SideshowBob
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,800
And1: 2,068
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
Location: DC Metropolitan
 

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#6 » by SideshowBob » Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:56 am

Posted this on the PC board a few days ago

SideshowBob wrote:2012 Regular Season

Durant + Westbrook (No Harden) - 103.4 ORTG in 1090.0 minutes

Harden + Westbrook (No Durant) - 108.7 ORTG in 64.1 minutes

Durant + Harden (No Westbrook) - 112.0 ORTG in 254.9 minutes

Durant + Westbrook + Harden - 117.5 ORTG in 1167.0 minutes (+12.9 League Average)


2012 Playoffs

Durant + Westbrook (No Harden) - 103.5 ORTG in 308.8 minutes

Harden + Westbrook (No Durant) - 121.4 ORTG in 28.4 minutes

Durant + Harden (No Westbrook) - 97.3 ORTG in 98.1 minutes

Durant + Westbrook + Harden - 119.4 ORTG in 430.0 minutes (+14.8 League Average)

They were destroying teams with all three of them on the floor last year. That's a nearly 120 ORTG lineup playing 21.5 minutes a game in the playoffs


I don't see any reason why they wouldn't have worked again this season. Considering all three have made improvements, they would've been even more dominant offensively than they are now.
Marty Hart wrote:Every time I think you hit a ceiling, you just keep raising the bar. You are like the Michael Jordan of being a son of a bitch.
spearsy23
Head Coach
Posts: 6,701
And1: 513
Joined: Jan 27, 2012

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#7 » by spearsy23 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:06 am

Marginally at best and there wouldn't be near as much improvement from ibaka.
bertrob wrote:You can't drive past Fisher when his shorts are pulled up
impossible, not even Michael Jordan can do it
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 32,659
And1: 2,636
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Treys are for Kicks!
     

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#8 » by Doctor MJ » Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:52 am

KingzAndQueenz wrote:I say no. Unless Harden could be satisfied being a 3rd option, I don't see how he would really make them better. It seems Westbrook has finally relinquished control to Durant. End game, he gives the ball to Durant and gets out of the way. It seems the Thunder are even better this year than last.

Anyone think differently?


They would absolutely be better. Don't overthink it. The issue with Harden was never that OKC couldn't seem to figure out how to benefit by his presence - the team played phenomenal whenever Harden was on the floor - it was simply that everyone knew he was capable of more.

OKC is better this year because the remaining Thunder players got better this year. First and foremost, Kevin Durant took one more step up in his progression.

Also, in case anyone thinks "Okay, but there's a limit to how good teams can get, they aren't far from the ceiling as it is.", I don't think anyone doubts that the Jordan-Pippen Bulls would smoke this team. This team is good enough to win a championship, but also mortal enough that they might not ever win a championship. They could have been even better.
carayip
Rookie
Posts: 1,237
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 28, 2012

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#9 » by carayip » Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:05 am

Sometimes I think the case of having too much talent is true. Sacrificing talent for a better fit can actually allow more opportunities for the rest of players to shine and step up.
carayip
Rookie
Posts: 1,237
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 28, 2012

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#10 » by carayip » Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:13 am

Doctor MJ wrote:
KingzAndQueenz wrote:I say no. Unless Harden could be satisfied being a 3rd option, I don't see how he would really make them better. It seems Westbrook has finally relinquished control to Durant. End game, he gives the ball to Durant and gets out of the way. It seems the Thunder are even better this year than last.

Anyone think differently?


They would absolutely be better. Don't overthink it. The issue with Harden was never that OKC couldn't seem to figure out how to benefit by his presence - the team played phenomenal whenever Harden was on the floor - it was simply that everyone knew he was capable of more.

OKC is better this year because the remaining Thunder players got better this year. First and foremost, Kevin Durant took one more step up in his progression.


I don't think with Harden, Durant and Westbrook would step up improving their playmaking or at least have as many chances as they currently enjoy to show off it. Ibaka also improves solely by being given more touches and shots without the presence of Harden. There is only one ball in a 5 men game, all 5 men can't really handle the ball and score at the same time.
BigLurch92
Veteran
Posts: 2,741
And1: 387
Joined: Jan 07, 2005
Location: Portland/Missoula
     

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#11 » by BigLurch92 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:57 am

carayip wrote:Sometimes I think the case of having too much talent is true. Sacrificing talent for a better fit can actually allow more opportunities for the rest of players to shine and step up.


Totally agree with this.
Jim Morrison is not dead he is just not alive.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 32,659
And1: 2,636
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Treys are for Kicks!
     

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#12 » by Doctor MJ » Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:57 am

carayip wrote:I don't think with Harden, Durant and Westbrook would step up improving their playmaking or at least have as many chances as they currently enjoy to show off it. Ibaka also improves solely by being given more touches and shots without the presence of Harden. There is only one ball in a 5 men game, all 5 men can't really handle the ball and score at the same time.


When you speak of chances, remember that Durant & Westbrook's volume remain roughly constant. I understand there's been some shift in playmaking, but the team isn't better because Durant & Westbrook have suddenly become much better playmakers than Harden was. While Ibaka's improvements are obvious and coarse due to how rough his game was, the improvements elsewhere are based on subtle improvements that just have a lot to do with players getting more experienced and more savvy.

I understand that OKC has been good now for years so we have a tendency to think we have a grasp of what they are, but the stars of the team are still in their early 20s. While continued improvement isn't a given, when we see it happen no one should find it hard to believe.

With all said, I'll grant you that the shift in responsibilities in the team this year could have pushed players in a slightly different direction with what has turned out to be a big payoff. In that sense it's possible that Harden's leaving could have helped accelerate some good things. I just object to anyone trying to merely take correlation for causation here. The team always played phenomenal when Harden was out there. There was never a time where people watched the Harden lineups and said "They look so good, but the data is telling us they aren't actually that effective". It was always the opposite, and it was always the case that the team had other lineups that were underwhelming. Additionally, basically the entire time Harden was there people praised both his IQ and his ability to blend with the other talents. He was the one who had to defer, and he was the one who was being clearly held back, not the other way around.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 32,659
And1: 2,636
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Treys are for Kicks!
     

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#13 » by Doctor MJ » Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:01 am

carayip wrote:Sometimes I think the case of having too much talent is true. Sacrificing talent for a better fit can actually allow more opportunities for the rest of players to shine and step up.


This is undoubtedly true, but it's not what OKC did with the trade. The issue with Harden was never that the team couldn't do phenomenal with him our there with Durant & Westbrook, it was that his talent level justified a salary that it's very hard to justify giving to a 6th man, along with the fact that Harden started getting really curious about what he could actually do if he were the Man.
User avatar
Frank Mulely
Head Coach
Posts: 6,847
And1: 635
Joined: Sep 04, 2009
Location: gone phishing

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#14 » by Frank Mulely » Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:04 am

Yes. Of COURSE.
Shv3d wrote:
Frank Mulely wrote:Honestly if this was the 80s

The official motto of RealGM.
User avatar
Frank Mulely
Head Coach
Posts: 6,847
And1: 635
Joined: Sep 04, 2009
Location: gone phishing

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#15 » by Frank Mulely » Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:07 am

BigLurch92 wrote:
carayip wrote:Sometimes I think the case of having too much talent is true. Sacrificing talent for a better fit can actually allow more opportunities for the rest of players to shine and step up.


Totally agree with this.


72 lakers
85 celtics
96 bulls

etc.

talent wins, period.
Shv3d wrote:
Frank Mulely wrote:Honestly if this was the 80s

The official motto of RealGM.
User avatar
anish23
Veteran
Posts: 2,539
And1: 49
Joined: Jan 15, 2012
Location: Hexi District, Tianjin, China
Contact:

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#16 » by anish23 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:15 am

how many times will this get discussed?

seriously.
Hmm......
ferk
Starter
Posts: 2,084
And1: 578
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
     

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#17 » by ferk » Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:28 am

Maybe
branny
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 27
Joined: Jun 01, 2012

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#18 » by branny » Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:36 am

Of course they would
User avatar
Durant 35
Junior
Posts: 473
And1: 1
Joined: May 16, 2012

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#19 » by Durant 35 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 8:22 am

Harden is better than Martin but Martin is a perfect fit and has allowed Westbrook and Durant to grow more and take on more of a balling handling role. Ibaka has improved alot too offensively so it's all had it's positives.
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 69,768
And1: 16,890
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Queen D
 

Re: Would the Thunder be even better if they had Harden? 

Post#20 » by Dupp » Sat Jan 19, 2013 8:29 am

KingzAndQueenz wrote:I say no. Unless Harden could be satisfied being a 3rd option, I don't see how he would really make them better. It seems Westbrook has finally relinquished control to Durant. End game, he gives the ball to Durant and gets out of the way. It seems the Thunder are even better this year than last.

Anyone think differently?



This doesnt make any sense. He was perfectly fine with his role there. Of course they'd be better.
Image

Return to The General Board