bball34 wrote:The loyalty BS is getting really annoying.
You're annoyed because you didn't get the replies you expected.
Well, at least for the most part
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
bball34 wrote:The loyalty BS is getting really annoying.
bball34 wrote:Steve Bulpett
Moot now, but as to whether KG would've waived his no-trade, CPaul and Chauncey couldn't convince him. Clips were still conflicted.
Ray Allen must laugh at him.
Not by any chance could he get another title with the Celtics.
StojkoVrankovic wrote:bball34 wrote:Steve Bulpett
Moot now, but as to whether KG would've waived his no-trade, CPaul and Chauncey couldn't convince him. Clips were still conflicted.
Ray Allen must laugh at him.
Not by any chance could he get another title with the Celtics.
After reading all of your posts I have come to 2 conclusions.
1. You get off on baiting the Celtic fanbase
2. You know what Ray Allen tastes like
Curmudgeon wrote:The Clippers completely blew this. Their ineptitude was astounding.
Scenario #1: (which looks fairly close to what happened). CP3 calls KG and says, "There is some conflict here and the front office hasn't made formal trade offer, but if you want to come here I can make it happen."
Scenario #2: CP3 calls KG and says, "Everyone in the Clippers organization wants you here and so do I. We're going to make a formal trade offer and if the Celtics agree, our owner and GM want to reach out to you."
Someone in the Clippers front office didn't want to do the deal and it was torpedoed. A proud guy like KG would never waive his no trade under those circumstances, and the Clips front office should have informed CP3 that the deal was rejected instead of hanging him out to dry.
No wonder that CP3 is now saying that he isn't sure if he wants to sign with LA long term.
GoLakersKB24 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:The Clippers completely blew this. Their ineptitude was astounding.
Scenario #1: (which looks fairly close to what happened). CP3 calls KG and says, "There is some conflict here and the front office hasn't made formal trade offer, but if you want to come here I can make it happen."
Scenario #2: CP3 calls KG and says, "Everyone in the Clippers organization wants you here and so do I. We're going to make a formal trade offer and if the Celtics agree, our owner and GM want to reach out to you."
Someone in the Clippers front office didn't want to do the deal and it was torpedoed. A proud guy like KG would never waive his no trade under those circumstances, and the Clips front office should have informed CP3 that the deal was rejected instead of hanging him out to dry.
No wonder that CP3 is now saying that he isn't sure if he wants to sign with LA long term.
How did the clippers blow this.....KG didnt waive his clause, it had nothing to do with the clippers messing up. Try reading the whole thread before posting.
irie wrote:KG has always been a very loyal guy and didn't want to play anywhere else. Not really a surprise.
TONY_YAYO wrote:KG didnt want to get embarrassed by Duncan in the playoffs I understand.....Clippers will still underchieved in the playoffs..........And how is it loyalty when the team KG's on trying to get rid of his ass. Certainly if they didnt that no trade clause KG would've already been gone.