I just read the "let's raise the rim 6 inches" proposal and hated it but I hate 2 things in basketball nowadays, those are the first two, and then I was thinking what could be done to make the game more interesting and I thought about the 3rd one lol.
1) don't fine the floppers off the floor. Fine them on the floor, give them a technical or a personal foul when they flop. Because 5.000$ fines didn't even have an effect on the flops. Let's see if the players still flop if you do give them technical for it. So 2 flops and you are out BAM!! if that's too harsh then a personal foul will suffice.
2) how many times did you witness a big getting into foul trouble because of illegal screens? I think there are too many examples and it makes the starter bigs sit down for extended periods of time... We should not penalize the bigs for illegal screens, because most of the time the guard with the ball moves before his teammate big is set, which causes the offensive foul. Just give the big a turnover unless you are sure that his intention was to hurt the defender.
3) and as a different approach, thanks to Mr. Walker, create a 4 point shot by adding 2 feet to the 3point line maybe to make the game more interesting
Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
Moderators: bwgood77, Dirk, Domejandro, zimpy27, ken6199, cupcakesnake, infinite11285, KingDavid, bisme37, Clav
Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
-
sabonis
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,561
- And1: 340
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
- Location: Turkey
-
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
- thejigglyroom
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,192
- And1: 1,345
- Joined: Nov 14, 2008
- Location: San Francisco
-
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
Also have the NBA outdoors, on Assfault, with pets allowed in the Stands. NBA will make a ton of money because how big is outdoors? It can hold millions!! Oh yeah, also figure out a way to have like five courts interlaced for maximum action.
Nyk_Fatboy:
Carmelos better than durant, Lance stephensons better than harden, Wade, Wall, Derozan, Parker, Westbrick and i prefer antetokoumpo over Griffin, bosh and dirk but its debatable
Carmelos better than durant, Lance stephensons better than harden, Wade, Wall, Derozan, Parker, Westbrick and i prefer antetokoumpo over Griffin, bosh and dirk but its debatable
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
-
WhatsaTDot
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,391
- And1: 7,302
- Joined: May 16, 2010
- Location: ♫ Whoa Black Betty Shambleland ♫
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
Plus 1 for Assfault.

This place is insufferable.
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
- blind prophet
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,576
- And1: 3,308
- Joined: Dec 08, 2011
-
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
Let the boys play, take away hand check fouls, be allowed to set tougher screens.
More toughness, less referee.
No to a 4 point shot, starts to make the game a circus.
More toughness, less referee.
No to a 4 point shot, starts to make the game a circus.
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
-
sabonis
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,561
- And1: 340
- Joined: Nov 17, 2006
- Location: Turkey
-
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
that 3rd suggestion was just out of boredom, but the Tony Allen flop last night proved that there should be some kind of penalty on the floor for flopping... damn. if Tony Allen knew that he'd get a technical, would he have done that? I don't think so.
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
-
DijonRondo
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,978
- And1: 1,801
- Joined: Jan 01, 2013
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
sabonis wrote:I just read the "let's raise the rim 6 inches" proposal and hated it but I hate 2 things in basketball nowadays, those are the first two, and then I was thinking what could be done to make the game more interesting and I thought about the 3rd one lol.
1) don't fine the floppers off the floor. Fine them on the floor, give them a technical or a personal foul when they flop. Because 5.000$ fines didn't even have an effect on the flops. Let's see if the players still flop if you do give them technical for it. So 2 flops and you are out BAM!! if that's too harsh then a personal foul will suffice.
2) how many times did you witness a big getting into foul trouble because of illegal screens? I think there are too many examples and it makes the starter bigs sit down for extended periods of time... We should not penalize the bigs for illegal screens, because most of the time the guard with the ball moves before his teammate big is set, which causes the offensive foul. Just give the big a turnover unless you are sure that his intention was to hurt the defender.
3) and as a different approach, thanks to Mr. Walker, create a 4 point shot by adding 2 feet to the 3point line maybe to make the game more interesting
That will just be fodder for the game-rigging conspiracy theorists. It also gives the refs WAY WAY WAY too much power. "Oh, I think you just flopped, EJECTION!" - Joey Crawford.
Refs do a bad enough job reffing already, no need to give them added ways to screw up the game.
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
- pylb
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,211
- And1: 3,716
- Joined: Jan 25, 2013
- Location: Paris
-
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
blind prophet wrote:No to a 4 point shot, starts to make the game a circus.
Make dunks be worth 4 points.
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
-
jowglenn
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,636
- And1: 4,252
- Joined: May 16, 2006
-
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
For a long time I have said that any shot from beyond half-court should be worth 4 points. It would add an extra element to those end-of-quarter heaves, and give one little desperation option to a team down 4 with like 10 seconds left - launch up a 4 pointer, hope it goes, try to rebound if it doesn't.
Keep in mind, you could only ever take this shots before brining the ball across half-court, so it would probably only be used really in the end-of-quarter situations, or end-of-quarter 2-for-1 attempts.
Keep in mind, you could only ever take this shots before brining the ball across half-court, so it would probably only be used really in the end-of-quarter situations, or end-of-quarter 2-for-1 attempts.
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
- Hawk
- Starter
- Posts: 2,006
- And1: 818
- Joined: Sep 09, 2012
-
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
On the last Euroleague final, referees were giving technicals to any player who flopped, and I couldn't agree more with that. So, definitely YES at your first point.
I'm not sure about the second point, so I won't speak my mind yet.
For the third point, I will quote the poster above me, who expressed my opinion about it:
I'm not sure about the second point, so I won't speak my mind yet.
For the third point, I will quote the poster above me, who expressed my opinion about it:
jowglenn wrote:For a long time I have said that any shot from beyond half-court should be worth 4 points. It would add an extra element to those end-of-quarter heaves, and give one little desperation option to a team down 4 with like 10 seconds left - launch up a 4 pointer, hope it goes, try to rebound if it doesn't.
Keep in mind, you could only ever take this shots before brining the ball across half-court, so it would probably only be used really in the end-of-quarter situations, or end-of-quarter 2-for-1 attempts.
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
- Spurtatcus
- Starter
- Posts: 2,350
- And1: 29
- Joined: Jul 22, 2009
Re: Changes for irritating rules and the Walker line
thejigglyroom wrote:Also have the NBA outdoors, on Assfault, with pets allowed in the Stands. NBA will make a ton of money because how big is outdoors? It can hold millions!! Oh yeah, also figure out a way to have like five courts interlaced for maximum action.
This never gets old




