BombsquadSammy wrote:I think that within the next decade, we're going to see a lot more tech entering pro sports officiating, with refs trained to call games the old-fashioned way in the event that the tech fails.
Imagine it: basketballs with telemetric sensors to detect things like carrying, out-of-bounds touches, buzzer-beaters, etc., synced with courts that can monitor boundaries and perimeters, travels, etc. We're also not that far away from the tech being able to model a game in real-time 3D, so that refs (and reviewers at the replay center or in a review booth at the game) can review plays in near-real time, from any angle, down to the millisecond.
We all know that NBA refs miss a lot of stuff and don't call games evenly, and that players get away with bending/breaking the rules a lot. Some of this is just a function of human fallibility and some of it is ineptitude, but everyone accepts it for the most part.
Let's assume a future tech-enhanced league in which the rules are enforced perfectly and consistently at all times. Which scenario do you find more likely?:
- that the players eventually acclimate their play to an environment in which they aren't ever allowed to get away with anything, and they learn to play perfectly within the rules
- that the struggle to play perfectly interferes with the flow, pace, and fun of the game so greatly that the league eventually relaxes and modifies the rules and/or officiating in order to preserve the magnitude of its entertainment
I know this is kind of a far-out 'concept' thread, but I found the idea compelling, so hopefully a few of us will get some fun out of thinking about how the integration of technology might change the sport for us as fans.