Wrong.Curry is god
Seriously. Who decided to make this video
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY9HjNWbJvA[/youtube]
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
Wrong.Curry is god
chefy12 wrote:Man this board hype ish up like crazy. Starting to look like Twitter/facebook now
Captain_Obvious wrote:Just unreal
I just don't understand how you can get to this shooting level, and where was it when he entered the league? It's like he sold his soul or something.
2Irving2 wrote:chefy12 wrote:Man this board hype ish up like crazy. Starting to look like Twitter/facebook now
Keep in mind these reactions are coming in the same week that he's had three 40+ point games and a 50+ point game and a dramatic finish against a championship contending team. He's on a crazy hot streak at the moment, eventually it will die down (I think), depends on what happens in the playoffs really.Captain_Obvious wrote:Just unreal
I just don't understand how you can get to this shooting level, and where was it when he entered the league? It's like he sold his soul or something.
Okay, here's my take on this because I've been seeing this asked a lot. Curry has more or less always been the player we're seeing now for much of his career, except right now it is amplified by his confidence and his team's confidence and the way they are playing as a group. But Curry has always been a terrific shooter. Look at his numbers, even in his rookie season he averaged over 40% from threes. This season, he's only converting 1% more of his three point attempts as he did in 2011-12 season. The difference is he's attempting 6.3 more threes a game now.
So why was he only attempting 4.7 threes in 2011-12 compared to the 11.0 he's attempting this season if he could knock them down even then? Well, I think it's because now he has a great team around him and is pretty much in the perfect situation and system this season that allows him to do it at such a prolific rate. And don't get me twisted, I'm not trying to knock on his ability but I don't think he's transformed himself into something totally different than what he's always been. The numbers back that up. (Granted, Curry has added some things to his game like his dribbling, passing and ability to drive to the rim) But people need to realize the luxury of playing with a sharp shooter like Thompson who's probably the second best long range shooter in the league after Curry. Then there is Barnes who can also knock down three-pointers and has a very dangerous mid range game. And then if that wasn't enough, Green is also just under 50% from the field and just under 40% from threes, but the point is you give him an open look too and he can knock it down. Then you have guys like Igoudala, Livingston, Rush, Barbosa off the bench that can also score. This is an unprecedentedly talented offensive team. Kerr's system allows for each of these players to play to their strengths.
Again, I don't mean no disrespect to Curry because even LeBron and Kobe played with Wade/Bosh and Shaq respectively, which helped them too. But I think this is why some of the "detractors" in this thread are hesitant to give Curry this "all-time great" praise just yet. I think he's a bit reminiscent of Steve Nash when he played for the Suns and in an offensive system that made a lot of players look really good and where Nash won his two MVPs. (Coincidentally, that Suns team was managed by Steve Kerr) Obviously, Golden State is a better version of those Suns in that they're also a great defensive team and have now proven to win a championship.
But the point still stands, a guy like LeBron has dominated the league while playing on average teams and carried those teams to the playoffs and NBA finals. His numbers have always been consistently great, whereas Curry has only really come into fruition once the Warriors have surrounded him with arguably one of the best offensive teams in the history of the NBA. Not saying that he's a fluke, but I don't see Curry being able to sustain this kind of level for his whole career. Unless he plays on historically great teams for his entire career, but I don't think he could ever carry an average team like LeBron did and that's why some (myself included) still can't put Curry over him until he's more proven.
Also, I'm not a Cavs fan I made this account a long time ago I just liked Kyrie.
ninjamilk23 wrote:I see a lot of people saying steph curry is the best player in the league right now by a wide margin and I totally agree. But even know he's the best player right now I would still rather start a franchise with Kevin Durant. Anyone else feel this way?
OsuCavsfan103 wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/BCUP-rIwLF4/?r=782049461
rizkid92 wrote:OsuCavsfan103 wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/BCUP-rIwLF4/?r=782049461
Would you like some pepper to go with that salt?
OsuCavsfan103 wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/BCUP-rIwLF4/?r=782049461
michaelm wrote:I agree much of this (other than him being anointed as likely the GOAT shooter) is premature and evaporates if GSW don't seal the deal and win the title again with an historic or near historic record.
mtron929 wrote:How about this strategy to stop/contain Curry?
This comes from the idea that I had on another thread, which is that refs will not call fouls on every single play even if you foul on every single play. So do what Chris Paul does to Curry. Basically, be very physical (grab/hold) him on every single play, but make it very subtle. The worst thing that can happen is that you get called on most of them, but by doing this from the beginning til the end of the game, you shift the baseline on what constitutes a foul (that is you make the refs more amenable to physical plays).
One downside to this is that your PG might foul out in the 1st half. And if you have someone like Chris Paul, that might be bad. So my idea is this. Against the Warriors, you start a backup as a point guard and have him be physical all throughout the 1st quarter. If he fouls out in the 1st quarter, so be it. If not, then you exploit this weakness of the ref and keep on doing this all game long even when you bring the starter in the game.
Thoughts?
michaelm wrote:mtron929 wrote:How about this strategy to stop/contain Curry?
This comes from the idea that I had on another thread, which is that refs will not call fouls on every single play even if you foul on every single play. So do what Chris Paul does to Curry. Basically, be very physical (grab/hold) him on every single play, but make it very subtle. The worst thing that can happen is that you get called on most of them, but by doing this from the beginning til the end of the game, you shift the baseline on what constitutes a foul (that is you make the refs more amenable to physical plays).
One downside to this is that your PG might foul out in the 1st half. And if you have someone like Chris Paul, that might be bad. So my idea is this. Against the Warriors, you start a backup as a point guard and have him be physical all throughout the 1st quarter. If he fouls out in the 1st quarter, so be it. If not, then you exploit this weakness of the ref and keep on doing this all game long even when you bring the starter in the game.
Thoughts?
Chris Paul as an acknowledged great PG himself would be more likely to get away with it; putting a scrub on him to specifically employ this tactic would be fairly obvious and likely rapidly clamped down on.
kaiballz wrote:if anyone can make this comeback (3-1), we can.
I believe in this team.
ninjamilk23 wrote:I see a lot of people saying steph curry is the best player in the league right now by a wide margin and I totally agree. But even know he's the best player right now I would still rather start a franchise with Kevin Durant. Anyone else feel this way?