NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing

Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285

Does the NBA get the $75 billion TV money, not including streaming rights?

Yes and also additional $$$ for streaming
16
20%
Yes but WBD/TNT and Disney/ESPN get streaming rights
8
10%
No, but a multiple of the current $24 billion deal and a significant streaming deal
33
40%
No, about the same or a little bump
25
30%
 
Total votes: 82

wco81
RealGM
Posts: 22,207
And1: 9,291
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#121 » by wco81 » Sat Aug 5, 2023 12:20 am

Teams are signing stars to huge deals, such as the Jaylen Brown and now today, AD's extensions.

The numbers being reported are assuming 10% salary cap increases every year after the new TV deal is signed.

But now you have a big strike in Hollywood, with screenwriters and actors demanding more share of streaming profits while companies are reporting billions in losses from streaming, such as Disney (owns ESPN) and WBD (owns TNT).

As noted above, Disney is trying to determine how much they want to be in the linear TV business when ESPN is losing viewers and they're laying off a lot of their most expensive on-air talent.

So is Disney going to re-up with a huge deal for the rights to broadcast NBA games?

Same question for WBD and TNT's rights.

The assumption is that if these media companies won't pay the 3X money that NBA is looking for, then others, like NBC and tech companies like Amazon and Apple will pay t he asking price for those rights.

Recently Apple offered a deal for Pac 12 TV rights but the money was apparently paltry, conditional based on how many subscribers would actually pay to watch Pac 12 football and basketball games. So many of the Pac 12 schools have been joining other conferences.

Washington and Oregon just joined the Big 10, even though they will get less TV money than other Big 10 schools, putting them at a competitive disadvantage. But apparently it was still more than any deal the old husk of the Pac 12 could get.

So who knows, maybe the TV sports bubble is popping for every league other than the NFL and the English Premier League.


But sports are the only thing linear TV has which keeps millions of people paying hundreds a month for cable TV. NBA offers bulk of content, 4 times as many games as the NFL and programming for 8-9 months (through the Finals in June) versus 5 months of NFL games and not nearly as many games per week or hours of programming for the networks which have TV rights.

Hmm, maybe those $60 and $70 million a year salaries won't be hit as soon as people think.
Knightfall
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,260
And1: 1,052
Joined: Mar 23, 2021
         

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#122 » by Knightfall » Sat Aug 5, 2023 12:51 am

Isnt comcast still waiting to buy WBD in 2024. Which will then probably be merged to peacock.
User avatar
Lalouie
RealGM
Posts: 19,534
And1: 10,115
Joined: May 12, 2017

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#123 » by Lalouie » Sat Aug 5, 2023 1:40 am

if i'm network i'm gonna choke the nba on this load management stuff
Lockdown504090
RealGM
Posts: 10,939
And1: 12,111
Joined: Nov 24, 2015
         

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#124 » by Lockdown504090 » Sat Aug 5, 2023 2:47 am

Lalouie wrote:if i'm network i'm gonna choke the nba on this load management stuff

its interesting right? in the CBA negotiations, neither party was incentivized to combat stars not playing in games(injury, load management, personal or tanking) but tv deal negotiations would bring an interested party to the table. I personally dont care and have no issue watching terrance mann battle mo bamba next season, but tv companies could force the nba and PA to do something in order to get that huge deal they NEED at this point.
User avatar
Ito
General Manager
Posts: 9,100
And1: 804
Joined: Apr 13, 2002
Location: UPTOWN, NY

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#125 » by Ito » Sat Aug 5, 2023 3:14 am

They should get some NBA games on the local channels how they showed games back then on NBC.. they be showing some wnba games on the locals from time to time, I seen games on ION and UPN
Image
CelticsFTW
Junior
Posts: 474
And1: 401
Joined: Nov 20, 2013
 

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#126 » by CelticsFTW » Sat Aug 5, 2023 7:26 am

Revived wrote:
jefe wrote:
Revived wrote:It’s always interesting to me how these TV deals get done and the TV networks are obviously hoping to make the $$ off advertisements and commercials and such.

I can honestly say I’ve never ever in my life bought something because I saw it on a TV commercial. NBA loves to shove Hyundai/Kia/Genesis down our throat, I truly wonder if there is even one person in the world who bought a Kia or Hyundai at least in part because how NBA games always mention it for advertising.

Idk, maybe just me but I’m always surprised that these big companies pay so much $$ for advertising to these TV networks and sports leagues as if the average American is going to buy their product because of it.

Meh, it's more subtle than that. The primary goal of most advertising is to simply create brand awareness, not necessarily to spur a conscious direct choice to purchase immediately upon viewing.

Not immediately upon viewing but for example on the car ones, like I said NBA has shoved Hyundai down its fans throats for at least 10-12 years now. I’ve bought 3 cars in that span including one last year and never did I remotely consider Hyundai. It’s nothing against the company itself (they make solid vehicles) but it’s not something that interests me.

I can’t speak for everyone so I guess perhaps others do maybe think when it comes time to buy a car “Hey what was that one Hyundai SUV that we keeping seeing the ad for when watching basketball games? Let’s maybe go take a look at that one” or something.


Yeah, but someone is apparently buying Hyundai cars in the US:

„ Today, Hyundai is among the best selling car brands in the US. In 2018, Hyundai-branded vehicles holds 4% of the car market in the US. Their sales in 2010s has been much better than in 2000s. In 2016, the brand sold 768,057, a record for Hyundai.“

Scroll down on this link and you can see the sales for Hyundai in much more detail: https://www.goodcarbadcar.net/hyundai-us-sales-figures/
JN61
RealGM
Posts: 11,443
And1: 9,027
Joined: Jan 07, 2018
 

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#127 » by JN61 » Sat Aug 5, 2023 8:00 am

75 billion for this product? NBA is about to be bigger bubble to burst than any video game sports.

There is no way on earth there is anywhere near this kind of value for anyone outside of NBA in here.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 34,763
And1: 19,676
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#128 » by Revived » Sat Aug 5, 2023 10:38 am

CelticsFTW wrote:
Revived wrote:
jefe wrote:Meh, it's more subtle than that. The primary goal of most advertising is to simply create brand awareness, not necessarily to spur a conscious direct choice to purchase immediately upon viewing.

Not immediately upon viewing but for example on the car ones, like I said NBA has shoved Hyundai down its fans throats for at least 10-12 years now. I’ve bought 3 cars in that span including one last year and never did I remotely consider Hyundai. It’s nothing against the company itself (they make solid vehicles) but it’s not something that interests me.

I can’t speak for everyone so I guess perhaps others do maybe think when it comes time to buy a car “Hey what was that one Hyundai SUV that we keeping seeing the ad for when watching basketball games? Let’s maybe go take a look at that one” or something.


Yeah, but someone is apparently buying Hyundai cars in the US:

„ Today, Hyundai is among the best selling car brands in the US. In 2018, Hyundai-branded vehicles holds 4% of the car market in the US. Their sales in 2010s has been much better than in 2000s. In 2016, the brand sold 768,057, a record for Hyundai.“

Scroll down on this link and you can see the sales for Hyundai in much more detail: https://www.goodcarbadcar.net/hyundai-us-sales-figures/

I’m not saying nobody is buying their vehicles. But is it because of people seeing it on NBA game commercials?
User avatar
sashaturiaf
Veteran
Posts: 2,814
And1: 2,836
Joined: Jan 18, 2021
 

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#129 » by sashaturiaf » Sat Aug 5, 2023 2:28 pm

Revived wrote:It’s always interesting to me how these TV deals get done and the TV networks are obviously hoping to make the $$ off advertisements and commercials and such.

I can honestly say I’ve never ever in my life bought something because I saw it on a TV commercial. NBA loves to shove Hyundai/Kia/Genesis down our throat, I truly wonder if there is even one person in the world who bought a Kia or Hyundai at least in part because how NBA games always mention it for advertising.

Idk, maybe just me but I’m always surprised that these big companies pay so much $$ for advertising to these TV networks and sports leagues as if the average American is going to buy their product because of it.


TV ads definitely work. It buys the brand prestige getting associated with the best basketball players in the world, and also allows the brand to create and project their brand image which then directly equals sales.

realGM ads on the other other, I have my doubts over. I never look at that ****, barely notice it's there
User avatar
Flash4thewin
RealGM
Posts: 12,413
And1: 8,176
Joined: Jan 27, 2006

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#130 » by Flash4thewin » Sat Aug 5, 2023 2:47 pm

CelticsFTW wrote:
Revived wrote:
jefe wrote:Meh, it's more subtle than that. The primary goal of most advertising is to simply create brand awareness, not necessarily to spur a conscious direct choice to purchase immediately upon viewing.

Not immediately upon viewing but for example on the car ones, like I said NBA has shoved Hyundai down its fans throats for at least 10-12 years now. I’ve bought 3 cars in that span including one last year and never did I remotely consider Hyundai. It’s nothing against the company itself (they make solid vehicles) but it’s not something that interests me.

I can’t speak for everyone so I guess perhaps others do maybe think when it comes time to buy a car “Hey what was that one Hyundai SUV that we keeping seeing the ad for when watching basketball games? Let’s maybe go take a look at that one” or something.


Yeah, but someone is apparently buying Hyundai cars in the US:

„ Today, Hyundai is among the best selling car brands in the US. In 2018, Hyundai-branded vehicles holds 4% of the car market in the US. Their sales in 2010s has been much better than in 2000s. In 2016, the brand sold 768,057, a record for Hyundai.“

Scroll down on this link and you can see the sales for Hyundai in much more detail: https://www.goodcarbadcar.net/hyundai-us-sales-figures/


If one is in the market for an suv, those Hyundai are such a good value and are ranked pretty high. I would personally never get a Toyota or Ford suv over a Hyundai. Just spec out comparable cars and one can see a big difference in what your money gets you.
Tim Reynolds
Senior
Posts: 696
And1: 970
Joined: Jul 04, 2013

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#131 » by Tim Reynolds » Mon Aug 7, 2023 1:56 am

sashaturiaf wrote:
Revived wrote:It’s always interesting to me how these TV deals get done and the TV networks are obviously hoping to make the $$ off advertisements and commercials and such.

I can honestly say I’ve never ever in my life bought something because I saw it on a TV commercial. NBA loves to shove Hyundai/Kia/Genesis down our throat, I truly wonder if there is even one person in the world who bought a Kia or Hyundai at least in part because how NBA games always mention it for advertising.

Idk, maybe just me but I’m always surprised that these big companies pay so much $$ for advertising to these TV networks and sports leagues as if the average American is going to buy their product because of it.


TV ads definitely work. It buys the brand prestige getting associated with the best basketball players in the world, and also allows the brand to create and project their brand image which then directly equals sales.

realGM ads on the other other, I have my doubts over. I never look at that ****, barely notice it's there


....wait, there are ads here? That's crazy, I guess Brave browser really does work :lol:
ATTL wrote:Honestly you people laugh at toilet paper hoarders, but you really dont have enough toilet paper yourselves. The average person uses 1 roll per day. If you have a family of 4, that's 28 rolls a week. Over 100 a month.
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 15,846
And1: 13,772
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#132 » by scrabbarista » Mon Aug 7, 2023 2:47 am

Tim Reynolds wrote:
sashaturiaf wrote:
Revived wrote:It’s always interesting to me how these TV deals get done and the TV networks are obviously hoping to make the $$ off advertisements and commercials and such.

I can honestly say I’ve never ever in my life bought something because I saw it on a TV commercial. NBA loves to shove Hyundai/Kia/Genesis down our throat, I truly wonder if there is even one person in the world who bought a Kia or Hyundai at least in part because how NBA games always mention it for advertising.

Idk, maybe just me but I’m always surprised that these big companies pay so much $$ for advertising to these TV networks and sports leagues as if the average American is going to buy their product because of it.


TV ads definitely work. It buys the brand prestige getting associated with the best basketball players in the world, and also allows the brand to create and project their brand image which then directly equals sales.

realGM ads on the other other, I have my doubts over. I never look at that ****, barely notice it's there


....wait, there are ads here? That's crazy, I guess Brave browser really does work :lol:


1 roll per day?!?
Mamba81p
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,415
And1: 1,221
Joined: Mar 20, 2020

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#133 » by Mamba81p » Mon Aug 7, 2023 5:41 am

wco81 wrote:Teams are signing stars to huge deals, such as the Jaylen Brown and now today, AD's extensions.

The numbers being reported are assuming 10% salary cap increases every year after the new TV deal is signed.

But now you have a big strike in Hollywood, with screenwriters and actors demanding more share of streaming profits while companies are reporting billions in losses from streaming, such as Disney (owns ESPN) and WBD (owns TNT).

As noted above, Disney is trying to determine how much they want to be in the linear TV business when ESPN is losing viewers and they're laying off a lot of their most expensive on-air talent.

So is Disney going to re-up with a huge deal for the rights to broadcast NBA games?

Same question for WBD and TNT's rights.

The assumption is that if these media companies won't pay the 3X money that NBA is looking for, then others, like NBC and tech companies like Amazon and Apple will pay t he asking price for those rights.

Recently Apple offered a deal for Pac 12 TV rights but the money was apparently paltry, conditional based on how many subscribers would actually pay to watch Pac 12 football and basketball games. So many of the Pac 12 schools have been joining other conferences.

Washington and Oregon just joined the Big 10, even though they will get less TV money than other Big 10 schools, putting them at a competitive disadvantage. But apparently it was still more than any deal the old husk of the Pac 12 could get.

So who knows, maybe the TV sports bubble is popping for every league other than the NFL and the English Premier League.


But sports are the only thing linear TV has which keeps millions of people paying hundreds a month for cable TV. NBA offers bulk of content, 4 times as many games as the NFL and programming for 8-9 months (through the Finals in June) versus 5 months of NFL games and not nearly as many games per week or hours of programming for the networks which have TV rights.

Hmm, maybe those $60 and $70 million a year salaries won't be hit as soon as people think.


The English Premier League and soccer in general in Europe peaked a long time ago(2015 for Premier League) when it comes to domestic tv rights, and that is the biggest source of tv revenue. I am not saying the bubble popped, but they are not growing like NFL, or what NBA is projecting. I am pretty sure NBA can do better than the Premier League. I don't know if it will be 3x of the current deal, but they will not stay put.
Tim Reynolds
Senior
Posts: 696
And1: 970
Joined: Jul 04, 2013

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#134 » by Tim Reynolds » Mon Aug 7, 2023 2:11 pm

scrabbarista wrote:
Tim Reynolds wrote:
sashaturiaf wrote:
TV ads definitely work. It buys the brand prestige getting associated with the best basketball players in the world, and also allows the brand to create and project their brand image which then directly equals sales.

realGM ads on the other other, I have my doubts over. I never look at that ****, barely notice it's there


....wait, there are ads here? That's crazy, I guess Brave browser really does work :lol:


1 roll per day?!?


You see why I had to quote it :lol: :lol: :lol:
ATTL wrote:Honestly you people laugh at toilet paper hoarders, but you really dont have enough toilet paper yourselves. The average person uses 1 roll per day. If you have a family of 4, that's 28 rolls a week. Over 100 a month.
CP3nthusiast
Junior
Posts: 300
And1: 202
Joined: May 21, 2023
         

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#135 » by CP3nthusiast » Mon Aug 7, 2023 8:48 pm

It's gonna be so funny to see players get paid a million dollars to sit out games
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 22,207
And1: 9,291
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#136 » by wco81 » Tue Aug 22, 2023 5:24 am

Now there's talk that Apple may buy ESPN.

Of course the talk had been that Apple would buy all of Disney.

But it could be mostly analyst types just tossing out ideas.
Buckeye-NBAFan
General Manager
Posts: 7,981
And1: 4,538
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#137 » by Buckeye-NBAFan » Tue Aug 22, 2023 8:23 am

wco81 wrote:Now there's talk that Apple may buy ESPN.

Of course the talk had been that Apple would buy all of Disney.

But it could be mostly analyst types just tossing out ideas.


Apple doesn't make large acquisitions. It's definitely people throwing out ideas to generate clicks and attention.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 22,207
And1: 9,291
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#138 » by wco81 » Mon Aug 28, 2023 4:53 pm

Now Amazon is supposedly negotiating to make a streaming version of ESPN.

Someone is floating the idea of $20-35 a month just for that.

What are they smoking?

Well ESPN will have the Super Bowl, for the first time in 2027. Also in 2031.

But when NFL and NBA are not playing, there's nothing to watch. They can yak about NFL on First Take and other talk shows during the offseason but nobody is paying $20 or more a month for that and Little League World Series.

Any company investing in ESPN is probably going to pay whatever it takes to secure the NBA deal, because it provides bulk in filling up live sports programming. Probably means they seek to recover their investment by raising revenues, meaning higher prices.

But they're going to have the most expensive streaming service?
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 24,907
And1: 22,127
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#139 » by ItsDanger » Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:06 pm

The model needs to steer towards pay per view/subscription. For past 30+ years, consumers have been subsidizing all kinds of crappy product on cable/satellite indirectly. Technology has permitted consumers to bypass the traditional business structure. Now its on them to adjust. Today, its much easier to execute a product sale to the end user directly. The resistance is because they got addicted to ripping people off for so long.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 18,652
And1: 13,297
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: NBA's new TV deal, maybe not smooth sailing 

Post#140 » by kodo » Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:03 pm

Buckeye-NBAFan wrote:
wco81 wrote:Now there's talk that Apple may buy ESPN.

Of course the talk had been that Apple would buy all of Disney.

But it could be mostly analyst types just tossing out ideas.


Apple doesn't make large acquisitions. It's definitely people throwing out ideas to generate clicks and attention.


Yeah throw that in the bin along with Apple buying Kia for the Apple Car. Apple buying LG for the Apple TV. Apple buying Spotify.

Return to The General Board