JonFromVA wrote:madmaxmedia wrote:JonFromVA wrote:
I'm not sure what the G-League Excite or whatever they call the team for the Jalen Green's of the world have to offer, but I do believe the Cleveland Charge have access to the same facilities the Cavaliers use (and may even inherit the current training building all for themselves) all while being coached by a full staff led by Mike Gerrity who's on track to be an NBA head coach someday.
Meanwhile they are sharing systems between the Charge and the Cavs with the hope that players will be able to more seamlessly move from the G-League to the pros.
The more NBA teams have invested in the G-League, the better it's going to get and if the stigma ever goes away, maybe we'll see more first round picks playing in the g-league. Keep an eye on Emoni Bates, he'll be a great test of whether the G-League with the right structure can help a young/raw player develop the right habits.
NBA teams definitely have an incentive to work closely with their affiliated G-League teams and develop their players, but the Ignite is a different situation.
Which just means the Ignite is the problem. The obvious way to fix that is to remove restrictions on draft age, but there are other possibilities including investing more in making sure the Ignite is developing players more so than showcasing them.
Yeah, I'm not too familiar with the organization of the Ignite. At a surface level the general goal behind the team seems good. All the other G League teams are basically farm teams for their respective NBA franchises, which is a very good thing as teams can be directly involved in player development. I think the Ignite was formed to be a non-college option for players who weren't yet draft-eligible, but there can be some inherent conflicts between player development, maintaining or increasing a player's draft profile, etc. If a player is a great individual scorer but lacks in other areas, you want to help the player develop but also still want to showcase what he's good at to not sink his draft position. These guys aren't coming to the Ignite to sit on a bench and learn, they are there to hopefully earn some money and bide their time to when they are draft eligible.
I agree that removing restrictions on draft age is good idea. I'm sure they've studied the MLB farm system, a better player development system would help a lot. I don't know all the economics of MLB fam teams, how much revenue they are able to generate to offset costs, etc. I'm sure they run at a loss overall, but still pull in a decent chunk of revenue. Could that happen for NBA developmental teams? I don't know.