Whole Truth wrote:Pretty sure it's been said but I'm going to repeat it anyway.
Like any other rule, it's what the refs want it to be. Their level of subjectivity = control/manipulation.
Officials can't make a team win but they can control momentum in a big & subtle way.
VIP's like Giannis are allowed frequent flyer miles, while others ride coach. Flashy plays at the rim = entertainment, they would never affect that by calling the extra step or 2.
Catering to stars = catering to ratings = catering to revenue
It's more entertainment than true competition.
I disagree with you that non-enforcement of carry rules and the joke that is gathering makes basketball akin to entertainment rather than sports. I also think you exxagerate star calls. giannis doesn't get away with much more than other players.
But you're right the NBA rulebook is designed to give fans the plays they want.
American sports fans have made extremely clear they love watching super athletic players face up and attack the hoop. That is bar none the style of basketball that is most appealing to the median basketball fan. By and large Americans really don't watch basketball for intricate passing plays, complicated zone defenses. They want a 1-1 game with tons of dunks and layups.
And the NBA has designed the rulebooks to make that style of play work. The definition of gathering has been so expanded that the concept is basically meaningless beyond offensive player gets to screw around a bit with no risk of travel being called. Carrying is a non-violation.
As a result facing up and attacking the hoop works a lot. And really most of the people in this thread complaining about it would hate what basketball would look like if you'd actually enforced carrying and narrowed gathering. Offenses would be tons of little passes to set up jump shots. Most of the people on this forum would stop watching hoops
We, and I include myself, want pick and roll spam. We want crazy attacks of the hoop. We want absurd dunks.