Post#223 » by lessthanjake » Sun Mar 24, 2024 10:49 pm
I think the argument about LeBron’s record in the Finals is a bit silly by itself. Like, exalting one’s record specifically in the Finals logically leads to some dumb conclusions, like that it’s better to lose in the conference finals than to lose in the finals. If LeBron were 4-0 in the Finals and had instead lost in the conference finals (or earlier) in the six years he lost in the Finals in reality, then that would be unambiguously worse than being 4-6 in the Finals.
That said, where I think his Finals record is worth talking about is that there were some years where he was in such a weak conference that the opponent in the Finals was the only really good team he played. I wouldn’t say this makes losing in the Finals bad, but I think it makes those Finals appearances less impressive—there are basically years where he beat pretty mediocre teams and then lost easily the first time he faced a good team, which is less impressive than getting through difficult teams and then losing in the Finals. LeBron lost in the Finals in 2007, 2011, 2014, 2015, 2017, and 2018. IMO, his teams did not face a good opponent before the Finals in 2014 or 2017. In 2015 and 2018, they didn’t face any good team except maybe one team that was a pretty good regular season team that year but was a pretty quintessential and obvious playoff-paper-tiger due to having an ensemble cast and no real star. So I don’t really think they faced a good team in those years either. The 2007 run is arguably similar to 2015 and 2017, but feels a bit harder to me because, even though the Pistons had a down year that year and didn’t have a major star, their core proved they weren’t a playoff paper tiger. And I think LeBron clearly did face good opponents prior to the Finals in 2011. Overall, when combined with the fact that LeBron’s teams in these years generally also lost pretty easily in the Finals, I think we can probably infer that he likely wouldn’t have made the Finals most of those years if he’d been in a conference that wasn’t bad. To me, that’s a legitimate point to make about his career, which does put the significance of the 10 Finals appearances into perspective. But the irony is that people who focus on the idea that LeBron has a losing record in the Finals would actually apparently think more highly of LeBron if he’d been in a tough conference and simply not made the Finals in the vast majority of those years, because his “Finals record” would be better. To me, making 10 Finals is really impressive and definitely a good thing even if he lost 6 of them, but it’s just less impressive than it would be if his conference wasn’t frequently a cakewalk followed by his team losing easily in the Finals.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.