Roscoe Sheed wrote:I don’t think he is better than Allan Houston, Sprewell, Melo, or Zach Randolph
Absolutely laughable. lol.
Moderators: Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285
Roscoe Sheed wrote:I don’t think he is better than Allan Houston, Sprewell, Melo, or Zach Randolph
Wolveswin wrote:bronxknicksfan1 wrote:Wolveswin wrote:Tallest midget (op).
47 shots to get 61 in OT loss. Stinks of a big market biased thread.
You think anyone can score 60 on that many shots? We just saw yesterday that just because a player gets 40 shots doesn’t mean they can score 60.
Not to mention, Brunson shot 53% from the field and 38% from 3.
I think your reading comprehension missed something. I didn’t say anything about capability…
Because a player can shoot 40 shots and score zero points.
What you should have read, was a player shot 47 shots and scored 61, in OT, in a loss. Not climbing Everest here, worth a ‘best of thread’.
Capn'O wrote:Wolveswin wrote:bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
You think anyone can score 60 on that many shots? We just saw yesterday that just because a player gets 40 shots doesn’t mean they can score 60.
Not to mention, Brunson shot 53% from the field and 38% from 3.
I think your reading comprehension missed something. I didn’t say anything about capability…
Because a player can shoot 40 shots and score zero points.
What you should have read, was a player shot 47 shots and scored 61, in OT, in a loss. Not climbing Everest here, worth a ‘best of thread’.
Did you watch the game.
Capn'O wrote:He might become the best Knick.
Yoshun wrote:It may be a low bar, but Brunson is a hell of a player. Any team in the league would love to have him.
Capn'O wrote:Wolveswin wrote:bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
You think anyone can score 60 on that many shots? We just saw yesterday that just because a player gets 40 shots doesn’t mean they can score 60.
Not to mention, Brunson shot 53% from the field and 38% from 3.
I think your reading comprehension missed something. I didn’t say anything about capability…
Because a player can shoot 40 shots and score zero points.
What you should have read, was a player shot 47 shots and scored 61, in OT, in a loss. Not climbing Everest here, worth a ‘best of thread’.
Did you watch the game.
bronxknicksfan1 wrote:Wolveswin wrote:bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
You think anyone can score 60 on that many shots? We just saw yesterday that just because a player gets 40 shots doesn’t mean they can score 60.
Not to mention, Brunson shot 53% from the field and 38% from 3.
I think your reading comprehension missed something. I didn’t say anything about capability…
Because a player can shoot 40 shots and score zero points.
What you should have read, was a player shot 47 shots and scored 61, in OT, in a loss. Not climbing Everest here, worth a ‘best of thread’.
The weak ass cop out of “reading comprehension” when people here make ridiculous statements is always hilarious
Roy T wrote:Man you need to put some respec on a few people names.
Brunson has not done **** in New York so far, he might as well be an empty stats guy at this point.
Sofia wrote:Capn'O wrote:Wolveswin wrote:I think your reading comprehension missed something. I didn’t say anything about capability…
Because a player can shoot 40 shots and score zero points.
What you should have read, was a player shot 47 shots and scored 61, in OT, in a loss. Not climbing Everest here, worth a ‘best of thread’.
Did you watch the game.
I actually think the Knicks lost because he was looking to distribute on the first few possessions of the overtime. He should have told everyone else to get the **** out of the way…. Especially ol’ brick hands Robinson
sisibilio wrote:Capn'O wrote:He might become the best Knick.
Sounds crazy but at this point i wouldn't rule that out.
Who's more highly regarded among Knicks fanbase? Ewing, Frazier or Reed?
Roy T wrote:Man you need to put some respec on a few people names.
Brunson has not done **** in New York so far, he might as well be an empty stats guy at this point.
Patches Perry wrote:This is basically saying he is better than Carmelo. I suppose it's debatable but Carmelo did average 28.7ppg on a Knicks team that won 54 games.
Brunson has overachieved and become more likable than Carmelo, but I'm not sure he has cleared that bar yet. He very well could though.
Roscoe Sheed wrote:I don’t think he is better than Allan Houston, Sprewell, Melo, or Zach Randolph
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
cgf wrote:Roscoe Sheed wrote:I don’t think he is better than Allan Houston, Sprewell, Melo, or Zach Randolph
Randle is much better than Randolph was.
Capn'O wrote:Roy T wrote:Man you need to put some respec on a few people names.
Brunson has not done **** in New York so far, he might as well be an empty stats guy at this point.
What on earth are you blathering about? We're about to win 50 games with an injured roster. Have you watched a Knick game in the last 25 years?
Roy T wrote:Capn'O wrote:Roy T wrote:Man you need to put some respec on a few people names.
Brunson has not done **** in New York so far, he might as well be an empty stats guy at this point.
What on earth are you blathering about? We're about to win 50 games with an injured roster. Have you watched a Knick game in the last 25 years?
So what? You won’t win anything with this team and to assume Brunson can become the greatest Knick of all time, is just completely idiotic and disrespectful to your all time greats.
He isn’t even remotely on the level of a player like Trae Young…
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Roy T wrote:
He isn’t even remotely on the level of a player like Trae Young…