Wile E. Coyote wrote:WentzerWuver wrote:Bulliever2020 wrote:
Yeah I'm sure he doesn't care at all that he's now banned from the highest level of the sport that he spent his whole life working on and is now known as the Pete Rose of the NBA. I'm sure he'll just go on with his daily life like nothing happened.
Pete NEVER bet on his own team to lose. And he is a nobody while Rose is the base hit king of baseball and HOF'mer.
Big difference!
The problem with Rose is that even though he bet on his team to win it affected the careers of his players by how he played them. Danny Jackson pitched way too much a couple of seasons and broke down early. In the NBA this would be similar to a coach playing a guy 46 minutes a game every night and they blow out an Achilles.
I understand the impact on his players usage which was a problem but that has happened even if betting wasn’t involves but it being used as an excuse more than not. Betting on their own team to WIN should not be illegal and punished by the league. It prevents TANKING for drafting purposes which is much worse for the fans who paid with their hard earn money to show up and watch a competitive game. Obviously betting on own team to lose is illegal and should be a bannable offense due to tanking motives which is the root of the problem.
I think the rules should be revised to allow anyone who is part of the team, are allowed to bet on own team only to win which includes employees, ball boys, moping crew but they have to use the team's official regulated on-line betting outlet. No prop bets, just straight win bets based on Vegas odds.
Officials are still not allowed because it's unethical.
Why? It prevents tanking games, and it allows players and employees to make some extra supplemental income for once.
https://youtu.be/mcfzDqnTgYQ?si=4hINzQ_0OMAZVeyHLet's make this happen and allow Pete into Canton, commissioner!