ThatClockWork wrote:lakerz12 wrote:infinite11285 wrote:
You said it right here:
In all fairness, name a single top 10-15 player under similar scrutiny at 39 years old and/or in season 21.
I appreciate your apology, but know that my stance only opposes your posts, and not you as a person. I don't know you as a person, so I couldn't care less. Obviously implying someone can't read isn't the best approach.
My post of "So you’re basically saying that LeBron is exempt from criticism because he’s 39? That is ridiculous." - -
was clearly in response to ThatClockWork...
Are you the same poster with 2 usernames?How can you expect me to keep track and have a reasonable discussion when you are taking my posts directed to another poster as directed personally to you?? Or is it well known that you have 2 usernames?
"name a single top 10-15 player under similar scrutiny at 39 years old and/or in season 21." - - name a single player who has posters using his age or something else as a reason to exempt him from criticism or lower criticism.
For saying you only oppose my posts, you sure do seem to keep a detailed record of me in your mind . . . saying that I've been hating on leBron since he was drafted lol. You do seem to think you know me.
You came at me personally before I made the reading comprehension comment. You accused me of being a lifelong LeBron hater and have some historical record of me. So for you to say you only oppose my posts here is a lie. You obviously have a problem with me.
Again, the only thing I said here was that LeBron should be held to the same standard as other top players.
For some reason that really triggered you.
Given your posts in this thread, its safe for me to say that I don't deal with the hysterics. You badly misinterpreted my post to fuel your own narrative (lol) so I won't be engaging you at all. All the best
So for the record this was my post to you:
"So you’re basically saying that LeBron is exempt from criticism because he’s 39?
That is ridiculous. He is clearly still physically able and if you asked him or his followers, they would say he is still one of the best players in the league.
So, we can analyze his play like all other top players.
If he doesn’t want his play judged, he can retire."
I could have left out of the word ridiculous, but how is this hysterics?
Infinite11285 came along and derailed the convo by accusing me of being a life long Lebron hater, etc.
If we just stuck to the substance of the argument itself, it's not that big of a deal.
You said "this is the only take that matters" in response to the post of "Lebron is 39 lol." - - so how am I misinterpreting you?
I didn't attack you personally. I simply said it's ridiculous to imply someone is exempt from criticism in the NBA.
They are being paid tens of millions of dollars. As long as they are on the court, they are open to their play being critiqued. Even they would admit that.