infinite11285 wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:infinite11285 wrote:
The Lakers were number #1 in the West prior to the shutdown. Also, under the same logic, wouldn't a team like the Clippers, with an injury-prone Kawhi & PG, or Philly, with Embiid, benefit just as much if not more? What about teams like the Bucks, Rockets, or Celtics?
It favored players who picked up a basketball over that break and kept in shape which was a mixed bag all throughout the league.
All players had the option to decline the NBA's invitation. In fact, the Lakers starting PG opted out. Why make the poor decision to opt in despite being out of shape? Discrediting guys who remained professional and ready doesn't appear to make sense.
The rules and laws in each city the players lived in were different which played a huge factor in this. Staying or not staying in shape under this context shouldn't be linked to professionalism what so ever! Even just practicing as a team could have been wildly different in terms of it's legality. Meanwhile, I think most of us assumed, and reasonably so, that much like the NCAA the NBA playoffs weren't going to happen.
This isn't about if it was fair or not btw. It's a matter of it was a product we as the fans should accept as a legit playoffs. We're all welcome to decide that, but I for one thought the whole process from the start was horribly done. And the product on the court was wildly inconsistent and below the league's normal standards.