Warspite wrote: 1. There is no NBA HoF
Yeah, but the Naismith HOF and NBA are tied at the hilt.
Does the growth of basketball around the world mean there should be more Naismith HOFers, or that it should be less hard to get in, or that the NBA should have its own HOF separate from the Naismith one?
Should something beyond scoring be considered?? TMac putting up great scoring numbers on never-made-the-Finals teams for many years would have been a shoo-in for the HOF during the 70s. That stopped being good enough with Dantley. <sigh>
Look up Artis Gilmore and if you can make a case that Rodman was better than him I ll buy but you cant.
That's the argument that Artis should be in the HOF.
The Naismith HOF never much cared for the ABA, where Artis was at his absolute best.