Method to avoid tanking

Moderators: infinite11285, Domejandro, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, zimpy27, bwgood77, cupcakesnake

silverhill27
Pro Prospect
Posts: 948
And1: 234
Joined: Jan 10, 2008

Method to avoid tanking 

Post#1 » by silverhill27 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:45 am

My friend and I were discussing about some possibilities. One that arose was a march madness style tournament to determine the first pick and second while the others would be determined by the lottery. I'm kinda fifty fifty on this but I wanna hear some thoughts
Cevap
Banned User
Posts: 2,594
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 11, 2007

 

Post#2 » by Cevap » Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:57 am

i think it sucks and that no one will watch garbage teams play it.


besides, the teams that barely missed the playoffs would most likely get the first and second seeds
User avatar
CB4MiamiHeat
General Manager
Posts: 8,694
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 13, 2004

 

Post#3 » by CB4MiamiHeat » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:01 am

Dont be surprised to see this lineup tomorrow with Haslem getting injured and Wade having the flu.

Jason Williams
Ricky Davis
Dorrel Wright
Alexander Johnson
Mark Blount
Seattlesun
Head Coach
Posts: 6,041
And1: 359
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: A Sun in Seattle

 

Post#4 » by Seattlesun » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:08 am

intriguing idea. and i guarantee people would watch a game to determine who gets the #1 pick. would get better ratings than any spurs finals game would ever get.

of course, me picking my nose on PBS would get better ratings than a spurs finals game...
User avatar
edfmx86
Club Captain- MLS Soccer
Posts: 5,586
And1: 199
Joined: May 14, 2007
Location: Provo, Baby!
   

 

Post#5 » by edfmx86 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:10 am

wow i thought i was the only who found Spurs finals too repetitive
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

 

Post#6 » by NetsForce » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:18 am

A team that just barely misses the playoffs would probably whoop on a team in full rebuilding mode like Seattle, so is it really fair to reward that team that just missed the playoffs and didn't suck as bad as Seattle with a top pick when Seattle legitimately sucked all year long (I'm just using Seattle as an example ;=D)?
Seattlesun
Head Coach
Posts: 6,041
And1: 359
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: A Sun in Seattle

 

Post#7 » by Seattlesun » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:21 am

NetsForce wrote:A team that just barely misses the playoffs would probably whoop on a team in full rebuilding mode like Seattle, so is it really fair to reward that team that just missed the playoffs and didn't suck as bad as Seattle with a top pick when Seattle legitimately sucked all year long (I'm just using Seattle as an example ;=D)?


this is true, but isnt the lottery equally arbitrary?
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

 

Post#8 » by farzi » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:25 am

I think that all teams who miss the playoffs should get an equal chance.

Hey, that 7.1% chance is bigger than Portland had to get the number 1.
Thank you for all the memories BRoy. You were a class act and brought hope to an entire region for 5 years. You will be missed.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

 

Post#9 » by NetsForce » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:30 am

Seattlesun wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



this is true, but isnt the lottery equally arbitrary?


Eh but the way the lottery is weighted in such a way that a team that barely misses the playoff has such a small chance of getting the 1st overall pick, just look at the "Process" section:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_Draft_Lottery
HarlemHeat37
Banned User
Posts: 6,570
And1: 6
Joined: Sep 14, 2006

 

Post#10 » by HarlemHeat37 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:49 am

Seattlesun wrote:intriguing idea. and i guarantee people would watch a game to determine who gets the #1 pick. would get better ratings than any spurs finals game would ever get.

of course, me picking my nose on PBS would get better ratings than a spurs finals game...


you mad?..
MrCheerios
Analyst
Posts: 3,009
And1: 887
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: New York

 

Post#11 » by MrCheerios » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:56 am

Give the 4th, 5th, and 6th worst teams the most balls followed by 1-3. The worst teams still get great picks, but you gotta try at least a little to have the best shot. Give teams an incentive to avoid being the worst team and they'll win games.
Seattlesun
Head Coach
Posts: 6,041
And1: 359
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: A Sun in Seattle

 

Post#12 » by Seattlesun » Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:00 am

HarlemHeat37 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



you mad?..


you know my opinions bro, dont be offended.
User avatar
lukeridenour
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,263
And1: 1
Joined: May 19, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#13 » by lukeridenour » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:47 am

no the draft is definitely not equally arbiturary, anyone who thinks so obviously has not watched a draft before.
Manu Ginobili:

* Italian League Championship: 2001
* Italian Cup: 2001, 2002
* Euroleague: 2001
* Americas Championship: 2001
* NBA Championship: 2003, 2005, 2007
* Summer Olympic Games gold medal: 2004
tha_rock220
General Manager
Posts: 8,174
And1: 564
Joined: May 31, 2005
Location: Austin, TX

 

Post#14 » by tha_rock220 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:05 am

Have an additional playoffs. The 4 worst teams in the leauge have a playoff for who gets the 1st pick, and the team with the best record gets HCA. Break the next group off into another bracket. Give the picks out that way because I feel bad for teams that are actually trying to get into the playoffs and just fail, but are punished for trying by not really having any chance at improving through the draft.

I remember a couple years ago the Texans and 49ers were playing horribly, and if both teams had identically horrible records they would play and the loser would get the 1st pick. I don't think they had to do that, but I thought the NFL should have given the pick to the winner if the game had been played.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,064
And1: 18,181
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#15 » by NO-KG-AI » Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:35 am

Who cares, let the bottom 5 teams try and fight for the worst spot. I don't think it's gonna make a whole lot of difference in watchability if they don't tank.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
benultimate
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,351
And1: 858
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
 

 

Post#16 » by benultimate » Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:14 am

Well for starters they should use the lottery to determine the entire first 14 picks, not just 1-3. Would increase the chances of the worst teams (those that tank) of getting a bad pick and increase the chances of the teams that actually tried (just missed the playoffs) of getting a better pick.
User avatar
endemicBull
Pro Prospect
Posts: 862
And1: 10
Joined: Mar 23, 2004
Location: University of Chicago

 

Post#17 » by endemicBull » Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:45 am

Not much, if anything, that the NBA can do. The worst teams need the best talent, if they tank, so be it. It 'aint ethical, but ethics don't seem to have a place in the NBA...
triplet1984
General Manager
Posts: 8,356
And1: 177
Joined: Jan 18, 2006

 

Post#18 » by triplet1984 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:47 pm

Give the worst 6 teams an equal number of ping pong balls. That doesn't eliminate tanking completely, as #7 and #8 will probably tank a bit to fall into the bottom 6, but it stops hardcore tanking to have "the best shot" at the #1 pick.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 30,937
And1: 8,142
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

 

Post#19 » by bstein14 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:03 pm

This is a terrible idea. YOu would get teams tanking to miss the playoffs.

You think Orlando would have rather got swept by Detroit last year or missed the playoffs to play for the #1 pick to add Oden next to Dwight?

The best thing to do would be to change it back to the way it was.

From worst to best record, start with 14 balls and go to 1. Then pick all 14 spots using the lottery system.
jefe
General Manager
Posts: 8,182
And1: 646
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Location: memphis

 

Post#20 » by jefe » Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:11 pm

As a Memphis fan, I can say the only way to stop tanking is to tank and then get burned by the current system - you'll never want to tank again.

Return to The General Board