Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls?

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

User avatar
alucryts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,085
And1: 1,169
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
     

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#136 » by alucryts » Thu Mar 1, 2012 7:51 am

Doctor MJ wrote:This is the kind of analysis I'd like to see more of, and in more detail. What's clear to me is that the rotation of bigs of the Bulls is really having some great success. We see the rebounding for example - can it really be that the heretofore non-celebrated Deng is carrying a DPOY load on a team that just happens to have rebounding as a major calling card, which isn't exactly an area where he's spearheading the movement? Seems pretty unlikely.

But yeah, if you have links to nuanced analyses of the individual Bulls bigs, or really anything on the defense, I'd love to read it.

My spring break is coming up the week after next; I'll write a thread on the Bulls defense then with embedded Youtube videos of individual plays I will make up (just like I did with my Miami vs Chicago 4th quarter thread).

The basic idea of the Bulls defense is sidelines, walls, and baselines. The middle of the lane is the no fly zone; any player that penetrates there is a breakdown. The Bulls defense will be so tough in the middle of the lane that they will force player to drive into the wings. Here's the basic scenarios:

A) The ball handler is at the top of the key. The Bulls big men coordinate and set up expecting the drive to be steered wide enough so that the player cannot get to the rim through the paint. This part I am a little fuzzy on and need to look at more film, but I believe that the perimeter player here will play the ball handler nearly straight up, but he will definitely have a certain direction he wants to stop. Generally the idea is to force an isolation drive to drive into Noah. This next part is where Noah is our defensive MVP. On a high pick and roll, in order to preserve the middle of the lane, Noah has to guard BOTH players on the pick and roll for a short period. Once the pick happens, Noah hedges the player out just far enough to either force a WIDE drive towards the hoop or force a pass to the big man. While Noah does this, he has to maintain enough spacing between himself and the roll man to recover and stop the roll man on any possible pass. He does this exceptionally well. He is so good at it that he hedges, forces the hedge wide, shuts down the passing lane to the roll man, and recovers to the roll man before they can drive as well as shouting out where the drive should go. He is SO good at this. What helps him is that Rose and Deng are exceptionally quick at recovering from screens to get in front of their man. This is where Deng and Rose show their defensive skill; while Noah is great at what he does, Rose and Deng limit the amount of time Noah has to hold that position that increases in difficulty the longer the recovery takes.

B) The play starts at the shoulder of the three point line. This is the famous part of Thibs defense. You'll often hear Noah (and now Boozer) screaming out ICE to the perimeter defender. What this means is that the paint defender is taking over full responsibility for both his defender and the ball handler. In order to ensure this, the perimeter ball handler defender jumps out into position so that the only possible drive is baseline directly into Noah. You can now draw an arc/wall connecting the perimeter defender and the big man down low. This line will run from a step outside the three point line all the way to the baseline. It will be directly between the ball handler and the lane. The two defenders involved in the ICE defense will at all costs prevent the ball handler from crossing this wall. The ball handler can go over the top of the wall or underneath the wall along the baseline, but it takes so much time and dribbling to do that the play is killed. The ball handler will almost always drive towards the baseline where the big man defender lets him go underneath the backboard. This defense is practically impossible to score on because you can't shoot with Rose/Deng surgically attached to your shooting arm and you can't drive because Noah is waiting for you. They force pick and roll ball handlers to reject the screen and drive baseline because of how ridiculous the pick and roll is played by the perimeter player. Any passing lanes are shut down by the perimeter defender EXCLUSIVELY playing the shot and pass. By the nature of a pick and roll, a screen rejected towards the baseline eliminates all possible roll opportunities but leaves a long contested 2 point shot to the big man (exactly what the defense wants). However, this pass requires the ball handler to pass "cross court backwards" for the screener leaving the pass extremely vulnerable to being stolen by the initial perimeter defender.

C) It always happens. The above two scenarios run teams into the iso-defense. The Bulls break down all team offense and the team reverts to one on one offense. It happens every single game. The Heat love to get baited into this. The Bulls don't change anything from above, and because the team is no longer trying to make passes they are easily contained.

All of this is orchestrated by the big men in the paint who use the perimeter defenders as pawns for the defense. Rose, Deng, and Brewer are extremely good at funneling players to the right spots. THe difference between Rose and Deng/Brewer is that Deng and Brewer are not only able to deny the middle of the lane, they are also able to slow and impede drives towards the big men. That is why they are better than Rose. Rose is the best defender we have at the top of the key though and in pick and rolls; his speed, strength, size, and agility is unmatched on our defense. Opposing guards have extreme difficulty even getting shots off against him in the paint between his overwhelming physical talent and his excellent ball funneling. While Deng and Brewer show plus ability in funneling and even making what the defense WANTS the ball handler to do difficult, they are not our defensive best. That title belongs to Noah.

I'll have video to show all of this in a few weeks.
User avatar
rrravenred
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,118
And1: 593
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Location: Pulling at the loose threads of arguments since 2006

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#137 » by rrravenred » Thu Mar 1, 2012 8:03 am

alucryts wrote:
rrravenred wrote:
Dr Mufasa wrote:Yes, I think Rose is clearly better than Carmelo, but in both cases I believe you can make the case that part of the value of their presence is that it helped create order and a pecking order in their rosters and allowed supporting players to be supporting players where they are most effective, if that makes sense.


Absolutely. Take a player into a role where they're not suited for it, don't have the skills for it, etc. and of course their performance in that role suffers.

Having said that, I don't necessarily agree with you about the "pecking order" argument. A good coach (and I think both Thibs and Karl are good coaches) drill their players about their roles, about what they should and should not do in a game. I personally think that's more important than having a titular leader, and the Nuggs recent slide has as much to do with the Injury list occupants as it does about not having a volume shot-taker.

Correct me if I am wrong, but are you essentially saying Rose has nearly no effect on the Bulls, or it is extremely easy to replace (I might be interpreting your posts incorrectly).


Not at all.

As I think I've said before in previous discussions, whilst Rose isn't a champion at anything in particular, but is very good at a wide array of skills. Not a liability on D and is reasonably good at running an offense, as well as being a pretty potent offensive force in his own right. One of the weaker MVPs (IMO), but I also think he'll have better seasons than last year's, and that his best is still ahead of him.

What I am saying is in response to Dr Mufasa's claim that you essentially have to have an alpha volume shooter to establish a hierarchy in a team so that everyone knows their role. I disagree with this, and believe that roles are established by coaches (good coaches, at least). I do believe that some of the aspects of Rose's role could be filled effectively (maybe not as effectively) by other players. I also believe that the roles which Rose DOES fill are not necessarily the most important roles for the Bulls (especially on the defensive end, which as discussed, is the key to the effectiveness of the Bulls as a team).
ElGee wrote:You, my friend, have shoved those words into my mouth, which is OK because I'm hungry.


Got fallacy?
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,882
And1: 22,820
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#138 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Mar 1, 2012 8:04 am

Rerisen wrote:RAPM thinks Thibs is the best coach too! Not sure how that gets figured, whether he gets credit for players playing better than in the past at a unit level, rather than the players themselves, or what. Maybe someone can enlighten.


It's my understanding that the coaches are not factored in with the featured RAPM player studies, however the players may indeed be factored in with the coach studies but please don't use that sentence to be anything to meaningful, I could be mistaken.

I always saw the coaching analysis as a fun gimmick, but to me it just doesn't really make that much sense. The idea behind modern +/- studies is that there is enough player rotation in the course of games that meaningful sample size is achievable. There is no in-game or even in-season coach rotation typically, so any +/- study for a coach is INCREDIBLY board strokes.

Rerisen wrote:IMO, the reason this didn't happen - I mean at ALL - is in big measure to the buy in of Rose to Thibs, and that filters down on through the team. Stats guys (and I get called a stats guy on the Bulls board, go figure) hate this talk, because they just can't see its value in numbers, but I believe it. Telling me Michael Jordan had no leadership or drive value to his team other than his PER? Un-uh.

If Luol Deng and Carlos Boozer are your team leaders, instead of Derrick Rose, suddenly Thibodeau's voice carries a lot less far. Burnout - at least to some degree, looms. I mean the Bulls are really going to play as hard on D if Carlos Boozer is your #1 option top PPG guy? Come on, scrub Keith Bogans was calling him out in practice last year. Not the team leader you want. That's why I just can't stake year long hypotheticals on Derrick Rose missing 10 games, when everyone knows as 'the Man' he will be back fairly shortly, and they only have to carry the burden for a little while.


In all honesty, this is the type of stuff that I have trouble taking too seriously. I'm a Laker fan, and I"m constantly rolling my eyes at how the manufactured Laker narrative sanctifies every little action Kobe takes as if it all has some deeper meaning which turns his teammates from cowards to warriores. Rose is a couple years removed from paying someone to take his SATs and eating nothing but candy if the stories are to be believed. I'm not saying I think he's a bad leader, and bad leaders certainly exist, but giving huge credit boosts to every leader because he's not locker room destroyer seems a bit much. Rose is doing what he's paid to do.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
alucryts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,085
And1: 1,169
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
     

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#139 » by alucryts » Thu Mar 1, 2012 8:07 am

rrravenred wrote:Not at all.

As I think I've said before in previous discussions, whilst Rose isn't a champion at anything in particular, but is very good at a wide array of skills. Not a liability on D and is reasonably good at running an offense, as well as being a pretty potent offensive force in his own right. One of the weaker MVPs (IMO), but I also think he'll have better seasons than last year's, and that his best is still ahead of him.

What I am saying is in response to Dr Mufasa's claim that you essentially have to have an alpha volume shooter to establish a hierarchy in a team so that everyone knows their role. I disagree with this, and believe that roles are established by coaches (good coaches, at least). I do believe that some of the aspects of Rose's role could be filled effectively (maybe not as effectively) by other players. I also believe that the roles which Rose DOES fill are not necessarily the most important roles for the Bulls (especially on the defensive end, which as discussed, is the key to the effectiveness of the Bulls as a team).

Ok, I didn't think you were saying that, and I figured I was interpreting your posts completely wrong. I can agree with a lot of that.
User avatar
alucryts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,085
And1: 1,169
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
     

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#140 » by alucryts » Thu Mar 1, 2012 8:15 am

Adding on to my post about the Bull's defense in detail, the spot where Deng is so important is the type of players he can play in ICE. He is the only player on our team that can actively guard the pass and shot of someone like Lebron, Danny Granger, Paul Pierce, etc. No one else on our team has the combination of length and understanding of how to play ICE like Deng. In terms of mental ability to play ICE, Rose and Brewer could replace Deng. In terms of physical length to go along with it, no one on our team can replace Deng. In this way, Deng, Brewer, and Rose serve a niche role on defense. Deng has what I just discussed while Brewer is the only guy we have that can guard a Wade type with strength, speed, and decent SG length. Rose can fill in for Brewer here, but Brewer makes life on these players much more difficult than Rose can at this point. Rose is the only player on our team that can physically remove a point guard from a team at will and match the extreme speed of point guards. Watson does a decent job at playing the defense, but he doesn't approach Rose in how dominating he can be against any point guard. On any given night, Rose will be stronger, faster, and bigger/longer than the other point guard. Only a few point guards in the NBA can even claim to match him in one of those.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,882
And1: 22,820
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#141 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Mar 1, 2012 8:21 am

Great stuff alucryts, and worth noting that what you describe makes more sense with how I've traditionally though of basketball than a defense where Deng is more of a focal point.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
alucryts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,085
And1: 1,169
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
     

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#142 » by alucryts » Thu Mar 1, 2012 8:27 am

Yeah, it doesn't make much sense for someone like that to be a focal point. I could plan an offense that completely removes a SF if they were the backbone of a team. You cannot remove a power forward or center from the focal point of a great defense unless you have some exotic ass talent. A reason why Deng gets a bulk of the credit is that he primarily plays the big scorers on the other team in this dominating defense and plays them well. Rose's role on defense is more about shutting down team offense than explicitly stopping scoring. If he diverts ball handlers out of passing/driving lanes, 90% of plays are broken and the other team reverts to an isolation. Our defense now has a heavily reduced shot clock with an offense playing into our strength in isolation defense.
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#143 » by lorak » Thu Mar 1, 2012 8:56 am

Rerisen wrote:
Well but also Deng didn't look that great for three years previous to 2010 either. And most Bulls fans think he is essentially the same player (outside a bit of confidence and the threeball I mentioned). His base production really hasn't changed at all, but for up here, down there. His offense in specific has been kind of dreadful this year.

So I'm trying to get at what Deng is doing so amazingly different that he would become so much more valuable than he was in 08, 09, 10.


He plays better defense, because probably Thibo corrected his flaws.
Confidence level also is important and I think Eurobasket helped him a lot. He really looked like LeBron on that Great Britian team.
User avatar
alucryts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,085
And1: 1,169
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
     

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#144 » by alucryts » Thu Mar 1, 2012 9:11 am

DavidStern wrote:
Rerisen wrote:
Well but also Deng didn't look that great for three years previous to 2010 either. And most Bulls fans think he is essentially the same player (outside a bit of confidence and the threeball I mentioned). His base production really hasn't changed at all, but for up here, down there. His offense in specific has been kind of dreadful this year.

So I'm trying to get at what Deng is doing so amazingly different that he would become so much more valuable than he was in 08, 09, 10.


He plays better defense, because probably Thibo corrected his flaws.
Confidence level also is important and I think Eurobasket helped him a lot. He really looked like LeBron on that Great Britian team.

Thibs didn't correct his flaws as much as he put his talents into a system that makes them SHINE. Imagine Deng with no big man help. He has to guard the pass, shot, and drive. In Thibs system, he can DOMINATE the pass and shot while bothering the drive. His expertise is magnified by the system.
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#145 » by lorak » Thu Mar 1, 2012 9:19 am

alucryts wrote:
DavidStern wrote:
Rerisen wrote:
Well but also Deng didn't look that great for three years previous to 2010 either. And most Bulls fans think he is essentially the same player (outside a bit of confidence and the threeball I mentioned). His base production really hasn't changed at all, but for up here, down there. His offense in specific has been kind of dreadful this year.

So I'm trying to get at what Deng is doing so amazingly different that he would become so much more valuable than he was in 08, 09, 10.


He plays better defense, because probably Thibo corrected his flaws.
Confidence level also is important and I think Eurobasket helped him a lot. He really looked like LeBron on that Great Britian team.

Thibs didn't correct his flaws as much as he put his talents into a system that makes them SHINE.


Whatever ;] Thibs helped Deng and that's why he looks better this and last season. But that doesn't change the fact that Deng is more valuable for Bulls than Rose, beacuse of his huge role in Thibs defensive system.
mysticbb
Banned User
Posts: 8,205
And1: 713
Joined: May 28, 2007
Contact:
   

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#146 » by mysticbb » Thu Mar 1, 2012 10:39 am

Rerisen wrote:Everyone's is a 'personal' belief, your personal belief is just in the infallibility of RAPM as a predictor, at least relative to anything else, while I prefer a more wholesome approach using all metrics we have to evaluate players, including firsthand observations, and understanding that players do not have static values.


You are talking a strawman here. I know that is typical in order to make yourself feel superior in some way, but the reality is, that you are not superior at all. RAPM is a better predictor than any other statistical tool at hands. And no, I don't base my statement alone on that. As I pointed out within the given data set we can see consistent results which are in agreement with RAPM, the reality is not in agreement with your argumentation.

As I said, you are trying to rationalize your personal belief, but I already pointed out a lot of flaws in your idea (like Watson was just hot, Keith Bogans was responsible for the lower +/- numbers, etc.). None of that was refuted by you in any meaningful way. The data also does not show that Deng's performance level depends on Rose much more than vice versa. So, in essence, Deng makes it possible for Rose to play like he does is as true as the other way around.

Rerisen wrote:You say the Bonner example isn’t congruous because of his minutes. And I’m saying that it is similar because you are telling me snippets of Deng playing a few minutes without Rose per game, are going to tell us how the team does at large for 48 minutes every game without him, including closing every tight game the team gets into. It’s not remotely the same circumstances to draw from. That the team choose to purposely rest Rose probably longer than they needed to because they knew they could run over about 5-7 poor teams isn’t really proving much here.


How can you even believe that the situation for Bonner is in any way similar? Bonner is used in specific matchups, in which he provides an advantage. Thus, it is expected that he will have better +/- numbers. Bonner is not used much when the situation is not there. Bonner has a higher standard deviation of his minutes than Luol deng despite the fact that he plays 18 minutes less. Deng is used in any situation, not just in specific situations in which he clearly has an advantage. Deng is much more versatile and showed that he can impact the game in bigger minutes at a high level, Bonner on the other side did NOT show that all. Ignoring that aspect is either trolling or completely not understanding the context.

The Bulls without Rose performed at the expected level based on statistical analysis. The Bulls without Deng also performed at that expected level. And I'm talking about scoring margin adjusted for the strength of schedule. And again, that does show that Rose has a high impact, just that Deng has a higher impact.

Rerisen wrote:You mentioned Vegas, that’s interesting, be curious to see the source.


http://scores.goldsheet.com/merge/tsnfo ... slist.aspx

I took the spreads, ran a ridge regression only on the games with Rose and Deng included, then with Rose and without Deng in the sample and then with Deng and without Rose. The intercept was 3, which is the HCA.

Rerisen wrote:Last I read about this, none of the stat based models are beating Vegas yet.


In this season so far I have model that has beaten the spread in 57% of the games. A model based on ridge regression of the results + ridge regression of the Vegas spreads is at about 60%. So, Vegas can be beaten by statistical models. The issue is that Vegas is much closer in terms of knowing which player will be in or out, the most people using stats models aren't including adjustments for injuries for specific games. Thus, they have a serious disadvantage.

Rerisen wrote:But historically, simply using the last season records of most teams, and repeating them as a prediction, ends up beating most stat based predictions for team wins.


That is false. The previous season scoring margin used as a predictor gives a RMSE (root mean square error) of 6.32 for the last 11 seasons. Using my boxscore based model for the same test gives 2.75 as the RMSE. Metrics like ASPM or RAPM are in the same region as my model and clearly better than a prediction based on the scoring margin from the previous season.

So, the rest of your post is based on the false idea.
User avatar
Rerisen
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 105,369
And1: 25,052
Joined: Nov 23, 2003

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#147 » by Rerisen » Thu Mar 1, 2012 12:06 pm

mysticbb wrote:As I said, you are trying to rationalize your personal belief, but I already pointed out a lot of flaws in your idea (like Watson was just hot, Keith Bogans was responsible for the lower +/- numbers, etc.). None of that was refuted by you in any meaningful way.


I don't have a big problem with your Bogans adjustment, even though I still distrust his rating based on his ridiculous high minutes last year with the same few players. Watson... the problem there is more the sample size.

However, none of what I wrote about clutch time play (where Deng has faded historically - and that we have no strong data for him without Rose) and the inability of our sample data to actually consist of enough of the the circumstances that we need to know; what the Bulls look like in full games over a long period without Rose, and against more than poor teams, was refuted by you. It can't be. Because it's true, we really don't have minutes from those circumstances in any meaningful amount.

We have a bunch of small minute instances of Deng playing without Rose, with backups against other backups. And then 10 games this year. 10 games which is a laughably small sample size for any serious +/- endeavor.

Your personal belief is that RAPM can nonetheless and regardless of these differing circumstances, predict the future better in any specific case, than any other informed opinion. That's fine, and I don't begrudge you your faith in these numbers, but if that is all you have to espouse over and over, then why even bother engaging in a discussion? You are just telling me what these specific numbers say would happen, but you have to know that is not really what would happen down to the exact point.

You had no counter to my example of LeBron's impact falling greatly in Miami, other than to agree with what I already know, that his circumstances changed greatly.

But that only reinforces my point. Without Derrick Rose on the Bulls for a full year – not 10 minutes a game when he rests vs backups, and Deng plays a couple of those – a similar massive transformation would happen to the Bulls - and to Deng's own individual role. I think very likely creating an opposite of effect of what happened to LeBron. Instead of redundancy of skills, such as in Miami, the Bulls would have a dire drought of skills, of ball handling and shot creation, such that everyone’s impact would reduce on bad fit, especially against stiff competition.

Why you think Luol Deng's impact would remain the same in this vastly different circumstance is baffling. Deng has only played at this level even by RAPM for *2 years*, while the 3 years prior to that he was rated significantly worse, while being virtually the same player in every other way commonly measured! It's not like he is a 10 year superstar with flatline mega impact throughout his career. We've already seen great variation just in his last 4 years.

Your response to why I don't buy this data as a good predictor (in this specific example, not RAPM in general; we are hardly talking swapping bit player around) is to accuse me of trolling.... because someone doesn't share your opinion! Nice.

That is false. The previous season scoring margin used as a predictor gives a RMSE (root mean square error) of 6.32 for the last 11 seasons. Using my boxscore based model for the same test gives 2.75 as the RMSE. Metrics like ASPM or RAPM are in the same region as my model and clearly better than a prediction based on the scoring margin from the previous season.


That's great if you have a system that can make money, I hope you are using it. But my comment was based on ESPN's blog last year which tracked dozens of predictions and systems, and only Hollinger and a hybrid formula beat Vegas.

http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_ ... beat-vegas

....

We can go on repeating the same things, but I think the main points have been made for why we see things the way we do. And actually this reminds me of our last discussion, I think about Hinrich's value. He's since fallen off a cliff, that RAPM probably also didn't see coming, but well....

I would rather move in a productive direction, and ask you the question posted at the top of the page. Do you have Luol Deng as a top 10 player in the NBA? He has been by RAPM the last two years. I would be afraid/fascinated to see your top 20, but won't ask for that. I suspect based on what you have espoused in this thread it would have to be pretty much RAPM by order, with perhaps some lower minute guys kicked out.

The MVP and SPM ratings in your sig link respect Derrick quite a bit more. :wink: You must put some merit in other metrics if you are pointing people at those numbers.
mysticbb
Banned User
Posts: 8,205
And1: 713
Joined: May 28, 2007
Contact:
   

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#148 » by mysticbb » Thu Mar 1, 2012 4:34 pm

Rerisen wrote:I don't have a big problem with your Bogans adjustment, even though I still distrust his rating based on his ridiculous high minutes last year with the same few players.


For the adjustment I used -15.3 per 36 minutes, that is really low. And it should be clear, if you think Rose is effected negatively so is Deng.

Rerisen wrote:However, none of what I wrote about clutch time play (where Deng has faded historically - and that we have no strong data for him without Rose) and the inability of our sample data to actually consist of enough of the the circumstances that we need to know; what the Bulls look like in full games over a long period without Rose, and against more than poor teams, was refuted by you. It can't be. Because it's true, we really don't have minutes from those circumstances in any meaningful amount.


I agreed with that view. ;)

The worst teams in terms of closing out close games are still winning about 20% of those close games. That makes around 4 wins less than expected. It is not that much of a deal. The majority of the games is decided earlier and not in crunch time anyway.

Rerisen wrote:Your personal belief is that RAPM can nonetheless and regardless of these differing circumstances, predict the future better in any specific case, than any other informed opinion.


You are talking nonsense here, because that is not what I said. RAPM is just in agreement with the data set we have; it is in agreement with the reality, and thus it can give us a pretty good impression about that. And that is NOT completely independent of the circumstances, in fact I had a big discussion with Wayne Winston about that as he declared Deng the MVP of the league based on his WinVal rating (APM derivate). I told him that the numbers are influenced by the circumstances and I would NEVER say that this is not true. So, don't make up stuff. The context is important.
The issue I have with your explantion is that the contextual changes should have been seen in the data. But all we see is the predicted drop in the performance level of the Bulls. And the drop is big, the Bulls are going from a contender (being pretty much the best team in the league with about 67 wins) to just being an expected 50 win team (add the 4 less wins due to bad performance in close games, if you like) without Rose. How is that not a big enough drop? What do you expect? Explain, what kind of performance level drop would be justified by your personal belief here?
With Rose and without Deng it would be 46 wins expected. So, if we add those expectations for clutch I introduced, we pretty much end up with a tie. So, please, how far are we apart here?

Rerisen wrote:You had no counter to my example of LeBron's impact falling greatly in Miami, other than to agree with what I already know, that his circumstances changed greatly.


Yeah, and instead of taking the next logical step and assume that I don't look at that without context, you proceded and claimed I would ignore context. ;)

Rerisen wrote:But that only reinforces my point. Without Derrick Rose on the Bulls for a full year – not 10 minutes a game when he rests vs backups, and Deng plays a couple of those – a similar massive transformation would happen to the Bulls - and to Deng's own individual role. I think very likely creating an opposite of effect of what happened to LeBron. Instead of redundancy of skills, such as in Miami, the Bulls would have a dire drought of skills, of ball handling and shot creation, such that everyone’s impact would reduce on bad fit, especially against stiff competition.


The thing is, it didn't happen in those 10 games without Rose. What do you expect? That the Bulls will just play against better than average teams all of the sudden without Rose? It makes no sense. The Bulls will play the majority of their games against worse than average teams, the same like they are doing with Rose. The Bulls will still play the great teams as often and will very likely lose the most of those games without Rose. That's what the results are telling us, that is what RAPM is telling us and that is what your personal belief is telling you too. So, where exactly is the problem? Do you expect the Bulls to play a much stronger schedule just because Rose isn't there?

Rerisen wrote:Why you think Luol Deng's impact would remain the same in this vastly different circumstance is baffling. Deng has only played at this level even by RAPM for *2 years*, while the 3 years prior to that he was rated significantly worse, while being virtually the same player in every other way commonly measured! It's not like he is a 10 year superstar with flatline mega impact throughout his career. We've already seen great variation just in his last 4 years.


Well, and I'm really surprised that you as a Bulls fans aren't able to remember those specific seasons in which Deng's numbers aren't good. Can you imagine that Deng's performance level might be effected by injury problems? I would assume that the performance level is not independent and is effected by injuries. And yeah, Deng in 2007, a year without injuries is basically as good as the last 1.5 seasons. Funny thing is that Deng's RAPM correlates greatly with the amount of games played by him. ;)

Rerisen wrote:That's great if you have a system that can make money, I hope you are using it.


Actually, I haven't bet on anything. It is the first season in which I tested that at all. But maybe I should start. You need a system being able to beat Vegas in at least 54% of the games in order to make money. So, it is pretty hard overall.

Rerisen wrote:But my comment was based on ESPN's blog last year which tracked dozens of predictions and systems, and only Hollinger and a hybrid formula beat Vegas.

http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_ ... beat-vegas


Those are seasons based predictions and the biggest issue for most is predicting the minutes distribution. Also, Hollinger is better than most at predicting the playing level of the rookies, because he can use the ESPN database for the college stats. Most other people don't have the luxury of that.

This season so far Hollinger again beats Vegas, but so does RAPM and 4 other predictions (listed on APBR board after half the season was played out). Vegas is pretty good at that, but I also doubt that there are just using the "eye test". ;)

Rerisen wrote:We can go on repeating the same things, but I think the main points have been made for why we see things the way we do. And actually this reminds me of our last discussion, I think about Hinrich's value. He's since fallen off a cliff, that RAPM probably also didn't see coming, but well....


Hinrich fall off the cliff after his latest injuries. So, if you want to say that RAPM can't predict injuries, I'm with you on this one.

Rerisen wrote:The MVP and SPM ratings in your sig link respect Derrick quite a bit more. :wink: You must put some merit in other metrics if you are pointing people at those numbers.


Those are boxscore based numbers, it should be clear who is winning the boxscore battle between Rose and Deng. Deng's strength is not captured well by the boxscore numbers, but better by non-boxscore based models. Overall the best rating would be the combination of both. A regression based combination (offense comes out as equally weighted, defense by RAPM is weighted twice as much as by SPM) would give the following Top20 per 100 possessions:

Code: Select all

Name                 Team  Min   Off   Def   Off+Def
LeBron James         MIA     1138   5.4   2.1   7.5
Chris Paul           LAC      902   4.7   0.8   5.5
Dirk Nowitzki        DAL      944   2.9   2.4   5.2
Dwight Howard        ORL     1266   1.7   3.0   4.8
Kevin Durant         OKC     1211   4.1   0.3   4.5
Steve Nash           PHO      960   4.5  -0.2   4.4
Luol Deng            CHI     1036   1.2   3.2   4.3
Dwyane Wade          MIA      740   4.0   0.3   4.3
Kevin Garnett        BOS      855   1.3   2.9   4.3
LaMarcus Aldridge    POR     1122   2.1   2.1   4.2
Tim Duncan           SAS      871   1.4   2.7   4.1
Derrick Rose         CHI      852   3.1   0.9   4.0
Kyle Lowry           HOU     1098   2.0   1.8   3.7
Paul Millsap         UTA      962   2.8   0.9   3.7
Kobe Bryant          LAL     1221   3.8  -0.1   3.7
Kevin Love           MIN     1241   3.2   0.3   3.6
Vince Carter         DAL      679   1.4   2.1   3.5
Ryan Anderson        ORL     1002   2.4   1.0   3.4
Josh Smith           ATL     1126   0.8   2.5   3.3
Chris Bosh           MIA     1129   1.7   1.5   3.2


I would use the minutes played in order to assign an overall value to each player. So, I would place Deng slightly over Rose here. But as I said, for Deng the predictions with RAPM are better than with SPM, while for others it is the other way around.
The retrodiction test with that combination for the last 4 years gave a lower error than for either metric alone. Thus it should be better at predicting overall.
BradPiff
Banned User
Posts: 100
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 27, 2012

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#149 » by BradPiff » Thu Mar 1, 2012 4:39 pm

No it's

1. Their defense and Rebounding
2. Rose
3. Deng
User avatar
alucryts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,085
And1: 1,169
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
     

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#150 » by alucryts » Thu Mar 1, 2012 5:33 pm

DavidStern wrote:Whatever ;] Thibs helped Deng and that's why he looks better this and last season. But that doesn't change the fact that Deng is more valuable for Bulls than Rose, beacuse of his huge role in Thibs defensive system.

I agree that Thibs helped him, but if you read my posts Deng does not have a huge role. His role is on par with Brewer's and Rose's in our defense. If you are willing to say that Deng is more valuable because of his defense, you should also have Deng as you DPOY. In order to affect a defense to a magnitude that makes Deng more valuable than Rose from his position, he would have to be an absolute monster on defense. Also, simply based on our system, you would also have to place Noah over Deng and Rose. The notion that Deng is more valuable than Rose is not correct. I believe the reason that RAPM or whichever stat says it is so is because of a flaw in separating out credit/blame on the defensive end. Deng may be the one contesting the shot, but Noah is the reason he can play in the guys face in the first place.
mysticbb
Banned User
Posts: 8,205
And1: 713
Joined: May 28, 2007
Contact:
   

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#151 » by mysticbb » Thu Mar 1, 2012 6:09 pm

alucryts, if Deng is not so important and can easily be replaced by other players, why do you think Deng plays the most minutes? And why is the Bulls defense with Deng and without Noah better than vice versa (much better)?
I think even with you looking closely at that, you aren't able to really make out the difference for the Bulls defense. When Deng is on the court overall the defensive mistakes are lower, because Deng is helping out much more timely than anybody else on the Bulls. Deng is the guy with least amount of defensive mistakes, and the rate of the mistake is basically as important as scoring efficiency for the team on the other end of the court. A difference, which might be not that obvious, can make a big difference for the overall team result. We are talking about a difference of 0.15 points per possession between the best and the worst defense in the league. To see that kind of difference, you need to look at every second really closely and look at all 5 players at the same time.

So, no, Noah is NOT the most important player to the Bulls defense. With Asik or Gibson at C the Bulls are better defensively than with Noah at C. The results are showing that the Bulls in the 7 games without Deng played 2.8 points worse defensively than average (based on the offensive strength of the opponents), in the games with Deng the Bulls played them 6.3 points better than average. And I know that people like to throw in "sample size" here, but in order to come up with the same defensive strength without Deng, the Bulls would need to play 75 games with 7.1 points better defensively than average in addition to those 7 games. How likely do you think is that? And your defensive MVP played 33 minutes during those 7 games in average. How can you think that Noah is so important, when he does not make that difference, while the absence of Deng had a big effect on the defensive strength? Don't you think Thibodeau plays Deng so many minutes, because he knows that Deng is the catalyst for the defensive strength?
User avatar
alucryts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,085
And1: 1,169
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
     

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#152 » by alucryts » Thu Mar 1, 2012 6:25 pm

mysticbb wrote:alucryts, if Deng is not so important and can easily be replaced by other players, why do you think Deng plays the most minutes? And why is the Bulls defense with Deng and without Noah better than vice versa (much better)?
I think even with you looking closely at that, you aren't able to really make out the difference for the Bulls defense. When Deng is on the court overall the defensive mistakes are lower, because Deng is helping out much more timely than anybody else on the Bulls. Deng is the guy with least amount of defensive mistakes, and the rate of the mistake is basically as important as scoring efficiency for the team on the other end of the court. A difference, which might be not that obvious, can make a big difference for the overall team result. We are talking about a difference of 0.15 points per possession between the best and the worst defense in the league. To see that kind of difference, you need to look at every second really closely and look at all 5 players at the same time.

So, no, Noah is NOT the most important player to the Bulls defense. With Asik or Gibson at C the Bulls are better defensively than with Noah at C. The results are showing that the Bulls in the 7 games without Deng played 2.8 points worse defensively than average (based on the offensive strength of the opponents), in the games with Deng the Bulls played them 6.3 points better than average. And I know that people like to throw in "sample size" here, but in order to come up with the same defensive strength without Deng, the Bulls would need to play 75 games with 7.1 points better defensively than average in addition to those 7 games. How likely do you think is that? And your defensive MVP played 33 minutes during those 7 games in average. How can you think that Noah is so important, when he does not make that difference, while the absence of Deng had a big effect on the defensive strength? Don't you think Thibodeau plays Deng so many minutes, because he knows that Deng is the catalyst for the defensive strength?

I already answered your first question in one of my posts. I never said he was easily replaced; that is what you are assuming.
alucryts wrote:Adding on to my post about the Bull's defense in detail, the spot where Deng is so important is the type of players he can play in ICE. He is the only player on our team that can actively guard the pass and shot of someone like Lebron, Danny Granger, Paul Pierce, etc. No one else on our team has the combination of length and understanding of how to play ICE like Deng.


Our defense is better without Noah and with Deng because of the bench mob. Taj and Omer together do as good a job on defense as Noah does. I think that penetration against the Bulls is more difficult with Noah in the game, but Taj/Omer are better at doing something about the penetration when it happens. On the Bulls, removing Noah/Boozer for the backups is a defensive upgrade because teams are no longer able to move Noah to the weak side and attack Boozer in ICE. While he is improving his play, Boozer still does not match Noah, Taj, or Omer in ICE defense.

Where is Deng helping exactly within the Bull's defensive scheme? His job for most of the time is not to help but to make the job of those who help HIM easier. To say that Deng is the defensive MVP is only something you can get with burying your opinion in stats because within the system he is not the defensive MVP. Noah is the best defensive player on the Bulls roster. Next to Noah is the combination of Taj/Asik. After that comes Deng then Brewer and Rose.
User avatar
Concept Coop
Analyst
Posts: 3,040
And1: 608
Joined: Jul 21, 2008

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#153 » by Concept Coop » Thu Mar 1, 2012 6:33 pm

mysticbb wrote:alucryts, if Deng is not so important and can easily be replaced by other players, why do you think Deng plays the most minutes? And why is the Bulls defense with Deng and without Noah better than vice versa (much better)?


Surely you know the answer to this question. Omer is one of the best defensive centers in the NBA - not exactly a fair baseline to establish value over replacement.

And yes, Omer has an argument for being the better defensive player. But, he is such a liablity in other aspects, that he can't stay on the floor for extended minutes. If you're not on the floor, you're not being valuable.

Noah can be - and is - the most important defensive player on the Bulls, while his backup is better, per minute played. Over the span of a game, on a greater scale, the season, Noah has a bigger impact on the Bulls' defensive unit than Asik and Gibson, because he justifies being on the court.

Alucryts' points were accurate: Noah is the most important player in Thibs' defensive system.
Real GM Bulls Board: Step 2 - Anger
mysticbb
Banned User
Posts: 8,205
And1: 713
Joined: May 28, 2007
Contact:
   

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#154 » by mysticbb » Thu Mar 1, 2012 6:54 pm

alucryts wrote:I already answered your first question in one of my posts. I never said he was easily replaced; that is what you are assuming.


So, what you are saying is that in a specific defensive situation Deng can't be replaced and thus the Bulls defense suffers greatly?

alucryts wrote:Our defense is better without Noah and with Deng because of the bench mob. Taj and Omer together do as good a job on defense as Noah does. I think that penetration against the Bulls is more difficult with Noah in the game, but Taj/Omer are better at doing something about the penetration when it happens. On the Bulls, removing Noah/Boozer for the backups is a defensive upgrade because teams are no longer able to move Noah to the weak side and attack Boozer in ICE. While he is improving his play, Boozer still does not match Noah, Taj, or Omer in ICE defense.


Indeed, Boozer is the weak link here. Well, we can adjust for that by assuming Noah's worse OnCourt rating is completely caused by the higher minutes he has to play with Boozer in comparison to Deng. After such an adjustment (assuming -10.3 for Boozer on defense alone!) the difference is still 3.5 points (defensive RAPM has 4.1 difference between Noah and Deng). Honestly, even with the biggest possible negative influenced assumed for Boozer, the Bulls with Noah on the court are still 3.5 points per 100 possessions worse than with Deng, while that does not take away the fact that the Bulls defense without Deng is much worse than the defense without Noah.

alucryts wrote:Where is Deng helping exactly within the Bull's defensive scheme?


Not in a scheme, but in a sense to cover up for defensive mistake by his teammates. That is not so suprising giving his length and footwork while being closer to the ball in many cases. Deng is just in better position, but also seems to recognize those things faster than other players while reacting in a better way.
In addition his lower mistake rate will make it easier for his teammates to play within the defensive scheme, that is also a reason Thibodeau let him play more with different players on the court. It is just easier for most player to play with Deng on the defensive end.

alucryts wrote:His job for most of the time is not to help but to make the job of those who help HIM easier.


Yes, but that hardly covers all plays. ;)

alucryts wrote:To say that Deng is the defensive MVP is only something you can get with burying your opinion in stats because within the system he is not the defensive MVP. Noah is the best defensive player on the Bulls roster. Next to Noah is the combination of Taj/Asik. After that comes Deng then Brewer and Rose.


Sorry, alucryts, at one point we have to take the results into account, otherwise we are making them meaningless. You are trying to completely ignore the facts here while trying to rely entirely on your belief that you can completely accurate evaluate defensive value of each player. Don't you think when the results are speaking against you, something might be wrong here with your assessment? Assuming the real results are completely off is a rather weird view.
At one point you have to test your hypothesis in a real environment and predict the real outcome. So, what would be your predictions in terms of value for Noah and Deng for the defense? And why does your value and the reality do not agree with each other?

Btw, you might want to check last season when Noah missed 34 games. How much did the Bulls defense suffer? ;)

Concept Coop, your post is covered by my answer to alucryts already.
User avatar
alucryts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,085
And1: 1,169
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
     

Re: Talk Me Down: How is Deng not MVP of the Bulls? 

Post#155 » by alucryts » Thu Mar 1, 2012 7:01 pm

mysticbb wrote:Sorry, alucryts, at one point we have to take the results into account, otherwise we are making them meaningless. You are trying to completely ignore the facts here while trying to rely entirely on your belief that you can completely accurate evaluate defensive value of each player. Don't you think when the results are speaking against you, something might be wrong here with your assessment? Assuming the real results are completely off is a rather weird view.
At one point you have to test your hypothesis in a real environment and predict the real outcome. So, what would be your predictions in terms of value for Noah and Deng for the defense? And why does your value and the reality do not agree with each other?

Btw, you might want to check last season when Noah missed 34 games. How much did the Bulls defense suffer? ;)

Concept Coop, your post is covered by my answer to alucryts already.

This exact same argument can be said from my point of view to you. Also, the Bull's defense will suffer, but it won't suffer greatly. You seem to have an issue with the fact that when a player is removed like Noah, Deng, Asik, Rose, etc that the backup cannot in any magnitude fill in. Kurt Thomas did a great job in our system. He was no Noah, but he was good.

Before this gets lost, what is the standard deviation in the numbers you are posting, and if available, what is the error involved in these stats when put to a prediction test? I don't know how many times I've asked for this in this thread.

Your problem is one of "correlation does not imply causation". These stats can just as easily be saying that Deng is simply a part of great defensive lineups as much as he is causing great defensive lineups. Are you implying that he is causing the great defense, and that he should be DPOY up their with Dwight Howard? I find that most every argument in plus minus is centered around the idea that correlation is causation. This is a huge misuse and abuse of the stat. How do you separate correlation and causation for these stats? You have to take into account other factors besides plus minus. When ANY of these factors are considered, the logic swings to correlation and not causation. Plus minus is the only stat out there that points to causation for Deng.

Return to Player Comparisons