"... was the most dominant big the league has ever seen."

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

Myth_Breaker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,122
And1: 77
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: Otwock, Poland
   

Re: "... was the most dominant big the league has ever seen." 

Post#21 » by Myth_Breaker » Sun Oct 12, 2008 5:16 pm

tsherkin wrote:
Myth_Breaker wrote:Had no idea that "clowning around in rap" completely relieves you of any responsibility for your words here (though why then Shaq apologized for his words towards Kobe recently?)


It was a foolish thing to do, but it's no different than making an off-hand comment about it to a friend in jest and having it taken out of context. Shaq apologized because he knew it'd make a stink and realized it after he'd already done it because the media has nothing better to do.

Shaq has the least respect towards his rivals out of ALL NBA greats and gave the corresponding evidence so many times. You may try to justify him due to being Shaq's fan, but it doesn't change the simple fact he's the biggest jerk (both figurally and literally) you may find around in this league.


I'm inclined to disagree, that's an overly harsh characterization. I'd say yeah, he's had his chemistry issues because he's been immature and selfish at times and had ego-burn, but with regards to respecting the NBA greats, there's a difference between not having a warm relationship with Kareem (who has never been a terrifically approachable person, even after he 'warmed up') and not having nice things to say about Bill Walton, and being extremely disrespectful.

Let's not forget, for example, that Kareem wasn't terribly supportive of Shaq. Anyone remember this quote from back in '95?

Kareem wrote:"Shaquille is certainly a force to be reckoned with. And he's going to be around for a long time. But I think Hakeem is clearly a better player. He can do more things on the court," Abdul-Jabbar observed.


I'm not necessarily disagreeing here, but it's not the kind of thing that would make Shaq want to cozy up to him and be best friends, especially at that time in his career and especially in February of a season he'd eventually make the Finals while winning a scoring title. He was averaging around 30/11 at the time, on about 59% FG. Not the greatest of times to receive criticism of that type, especially from an icon of the league.

Of course, later on in his career, Kareem would also say this:

“I’ve had nothing but respect for him the whole time I’ve known him. I’m surprised he took some sort of offense. I remember he was out there one game and he made a hook shot and he pointed to me in the crowd. I think he’s the best center of his generation.”


And the quote where he "took offense" was really quite mild:

"“I’ve probably only spoken two times to Mr. Kareem and once to Mr. Chamberlain,” said O’Neal, comparing them to former centers Bill Russell and Hakeem Olajuwon, who, according to O’Neal, continue to befriend him. “Coming in there, playing under [Abdul-Jabbar preceded by Chamberlain], I wanted at least to be on the same page… . It was vital that I had to make a name for myself in that organization. Why they don’t talk to me, I don’t know. I don’t have any hard feelings for them.”


This is not exactly "*BLEEP* Kareem and Wilt," you know?

So, there's some level of evolution in their relationship.

My point is this: Shaq has showed a similar amount of respect as to what has been shown him and that means his opinions and comments haven't always been flattering to the greats yes, but it's really only due fairness (though his relationship with Penny and Kobe was plainly inexcusable).

Kobe dropped his name in a police station to try and sully his name and the two had been bickering for years. Ewing was a rival and one that Shaq generally got the better of, someone who hadn't been especially nice to him either. Kareem had constantly voiced his opinion that others were better. Walton has taken every opportunity to trash Shaq. Russell? Shaq's endlessly respectful of Bill. Wilt and Shaq weren't that close, probably because of the direct comparisons and probably because Shaq spent nearly a half-decade in Orlando, which wasn't really anywhere near Wilt's territory.

I'm a Shaq fan, so I'm obviously biased, but looking at what's actually been said on both sides, I don't see a great deal of real disrespect between Wilt (RIP) and Shaq and Kareem, just an absence of friendship, very different from Shaq/Ewing and Shaq/Kobe. He's a problematic character, or has been during his career, certainly, but I think in this case (e.g. regarding the other great bigs), I think it's overblown.


1. Nope, saying something to friend in jest is completely different because you have to realize then your words aren't supposed to get through to mass-media, unlikely when you talk to journalists.
2. Suggesting that Shaq had every right to feel offended by Kareem claiming that Olajuwon>Diesel is both weak and inexcusable; if KAJ said the other way around, would you also excuse Hakeem talking crap about Jabbar? While Kobe being under heavy stress when being questioned by police had much better excuses to say what he said than Shaquille.
3. And anyway, no matter what you posted, even you, despite being a Shaq's fan, didn't really deny that O'Neal was the least respectful out of all NBA greats. What is quite understandable considering he was so ignorant during all his career, Mister I-Didn't-Know-Lenny Wilkens-Was-Once-a Player and AI-Was-a Top-5-Player-Ever. BTW, what's your excuse about Diesel insulting Barry only because Rick dared to offer to learn Shaq about better FT technique?
http://wiltfan.tripod.com
Read: Edward Lucas "The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West".
"So what, son, did your Poles help you?" YES, WE DID!
***** *** Kukiza i Konfederację!
XuDa
Junior
Posts: 270
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 15, 2008

Re: "... was the most dominant big the league has ever seen." 

Post#22 » by XuDa » Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:23 pm

Prime Wilt would only be fit to shine Shaq's shoes. He wouldn't last long on the basketball court faced with the immeasurably superior size/strength/bulk/athleticism/skill that Orlando/LA Shaq possessed IMO.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,783
And1: 9,698
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: "... was the most dominant big the league has ever seen." 

Post#23 » by youngcrev » Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:16 am

Shaq, in his prime, is clearly the most dominant big man I've ever seen play (too young for Wilt and prime Kareem). He was an unstoppable force during those championship runs.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,334
And1: 31,913
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: "... was the most dominant big the league has ever seen." 

Post#24 » by tsherkin » Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:43 am

Myth_Breaker wrote:
1. Nope, saying something to friend in jest is completely different because you have to realize then your words aren't supposed to get through to mass-media, unlikely when you talk to journalists.


It wasn't the wisest of things to do, no, but it's still nothing serious to really moan about, no. Shaq's media savvy isn't always top-drawer but that's hardly a crime.

2. Suggesting that Shaq had every right to feel offended by Kareem claiming that Olajuwon>Diesel is both weak and inexcusable; if KAJ said the other way around, would you also excuse Hakeem talking crap about Jabbar? While Kobe being under heavy stress when being questioned by police had much better excuses to say what he said than Shaquille.


You're misunderstanding the point; Shaq hasn't ever really said anything that's terribly negative or derogatory about Kareem; his line in his rap is a minimal thing and not actually an insult but a characterization of his own career versus Cap's, which is VERY much a different story.

And tbh, I WOULD tolerate Hakeem talking crap about Jabbar because Dream always played very WELL against Kareem.

3. And anyway, no matter what you posted, even you, despite being a Shaq's fan, didn't really deny that O'Neal was the least respectful out of all NBA greats. What is quite understandable considering he was so ignorant during all his career, Mister I-Didn't-Know-Lenny Wilkens-Was-Once-a Player and AI-Was-a Top-5-Player-Ever.


*shrugs*

It's not his responsibility to know everything about every NBA player and Lenny Wilkens wasn't exactly an NBA great, he's not even a top-30 player. A fine player and a Hall of Famer but that's very different./

BTW, what's your excuse about Diesel insulting Barry only because Rick dared to offer to learn Shaq about better FT technique?


Nothing, that was totally inexcusable and massively detrimental to Shaq's career, a point of pride that cost him dearly and has everything to do with being overly image-conscious.
TrueLAfan
Senior Mod - Clippers
Senior Mod - Clippers
Posts: 8,263
And1: 1,792
Joined: Apr 11, 2001

Re: "... was the most dominant big the league has ever seen." 

Post#25 » by TrueLAfan » Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:53 pm

Well, let’s start with this. David Thorpe is a f****** moron, the type of moron who clearly throws things out there just to see if people are listening (and, unfortunately, they are). Shaq was as dominant relative to the league as any C in history from 2000-2002. But the C position was at an all-time low in terms of quality. "Most dominant" requires a level of context; a group of players at your position to dominate. It’s unfortunate for Shaq, but that’s the way it is. We’ll never really know how he’d have fared if the league had a significant number of good Cs, or quality depth. Earlier in his career, when the league did have more quality at C, Shaq was *not* the most dominant C in the league…it was more or less evenly split between DRob, Hakeem, and Shaq…and I don’t think Shaq was number one.

Compare that to 1967 and 1968. Bill Russell, Walt Bellamy, Zelmo Beaty and Nate Thurmond were starting in a 10 team league. Zelmo Beaty was the fifth best C…close to the league average. Adjusted for modern stats, Zelmo was a 17-8.5 guy. ..and he was a good to very good defender just entering his prime; a guy who isn’t far from a HOF career. He was barely average in 1967 and 1968. How much would Shaq’s numbers have suffered if he’d had that sort of quality and depth to go against?

Or look at Kareem. My God, it’s terrifying. Between 1971 and 1974, here’s what top level Cs had great seasons and how many they had.

Lanier (4)
Cowens (4)
Unseld (4)
Wilt (3)
Bellamy (3)
Thurmond (3)
Hayes (2)
Reed (1)
McAdoo (1)

This is leaving out really good second tier guys and one hit wonders. That’s in a 16 team league; basically you ran into a HOF C in almost 2 out of every 5 games. Kareem’s MVP voting went like this

1971 1st
1972 1st
1973 2nd
1974 1st

I want to tell you right now that Kareem was the best player in the league in 1973. This is when MVP voting was a little screwy; Cowens got the award. It was a travesty. Still, Kareem’s MVP shares in those three winning years were .912, .709, and .583. (McAdoo and Lanier made a good run at him in 1974). To be that dominant over that level of quality—it’s light years ahead of Shaq.

Look at it this way. From 2000 to 2002—generally thought of as Shaq’s best three years—here’s how many seasons that centers had in the top 15 of MVP voting.

Three. (Alonzo Mourning, 3rd in 2000; David Robinson, 10th in 2001; Ben Wallace, 10th in 2002)

Here’s the Cs that were in the top 15 of MVP voting between 1971 and 1974

Wilt (3rd in 1972, 4th in 1973)
Cowens (1st in 1973, 4th in 1974)
McAdoo (2nd in 1974)
Lanier (14th in 1973, 3rd in 1974)
Thurmond (9th in 1973, 8th in 1974)
Reed (4th in 1971)
Unseld (14th in 1973)

And we don’t even have voting totals beyond #5 for 1971 and 1972. Lanier would be on more; so would Cowens and Thurmond. But as it is, the quality difference is staggering…and it’s compounded by being in a league literally half the size of now.

To talk about Shaq as being “the most dominant ever” is to ignore the reality of the C position in the NBA at the time of his peak. Would he have been as dominant if he’d had to go against, say, Bob Lanier, Nate Thurmond, and Dave Cowens 15 times a year? Unseld for 5 more? Wilt for 3 or 4 more? Sure, it’s speculative, but you have to think “probably not.” But Kareem was that dominant against that competition; Wilt was that dominant against much competition than shaq faced from 2000-2002.

Does Shaq use comments by current and former players to psych himself up? Of course. Does he probably exaggerate or take quotes out of context? Sure. Do his teams care? Hey, as long as the Big Fella is angry and ready to play, they don’t care at all. Tsherkin’s got it right. I’ve seen Shaq be completely respectful to Wilt and Kareem and Mikan when interviewed. My beef with Shaq is primarily one of motivation—if the guy had seriously tried to stay in shape and not wanted to be a rapper/movie star/whatever, he’d be a lot closer to having a claim on Most Dominant Big Man ever. He didn’t. He took toe vacations instead.

But I agree that Shaq’s personality and attitude towards past greats is hardly a black mark. I don’t think he was honestly offended by Kareem saying in 1994 that Hakeem was better than Shaq. Since Shaq said pretty much the same thing shortly thereafter. Shaq’s hardly the most disrespectful of all NBA greats. Oscar was/is worse; Cousy is a hundred times worse than that. Moses seemed indifferent (at best) toward current and past superstars. Rick Barry had (and has) a unique ability to piss almost everyone around him off, great player or not. I’m not a huge Shaq fan or anything, but I just don’t buy this idea at all.
Image
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,334
And1: 31,913
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: "... was the most dominant big the league has ever seen." 

Post#26 » by tsherkin » Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:06 pm

TrueLAfan wrote:. Earlier in his career, when the league did have more quality at C, Shaq was *not* the most dominant C in the league…it was more or less evenly split between DRob, Hakeem, and Shaq…and I don’t think Shaq was number one.


Not the most dominant overall but he was definitely the most dominant offensive force of the group. The big separation was that D-Rob and Hakeem and Ewing were all considerably better and more dedicated defensive forces than Shaq was at ANY point in his career. Shaq "accidentally" blocked three shots a game a couple of times in his career because he was so big and athletic but the other guys were canny and motivated defenders who really put the hurt on you bringing the help D and Shaq was never committed enough to do that.

I just wanted to put that distinction out there.

Return to Player Comparisons