RealGM Top 100 List #40

Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063

penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,973
And1: 9,668
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#1 » by penbeast0 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:43 am

Criteria: Take into account both peak and career play, era dominance, impact on the game of basketball, and how well their style of play and skills would transcend onto different eras. To be more exact, how great they were at playing the game of basketball.

Voting Will End In 2 Days (Monday 9/12) at 10PM EST

Please vote and nominate

Newest addition:

Bob Cousy
Image
Hall of Fame 1971
MVP 1957
10x All-NBA 1st Team
2x All-NBA 2nd Team
6x NBA Champion
13x All-Star

Chris Paul
Image
1x1st Team All-NBA
1x2nd Team All-NBA
1x3rd Team All-NBA
1x1st Team All-Defense
2x2nd Team All-Defense
Rookie of the Year 2006
5xAll-Star


Reggie Miller
Image
3x3rd Team All-NBA
5xAll-Star

Willis Reed
Image
2x NBA Champion
Hall of Fame 1982
MVP (1970)
1x All-NBA 1st Team
4x All-NBA 2nd Team
1x All-Def 1st Team
7x All-Star
Rookie of the Year (1965)

Allen Iverson
Image
MVP (2001)
3x All-NBA 1st Team
3x All-NBA 2nd Team
1x All-NBA 3rd Team
11x All-Star
Rookie of the Year (1996)

Dave Cowens
Image
Hall of Fame 1991
2x NBA Champion
MVP 1973
3x All-NBA 2nd Team
1x All-Def 1st Team
2x All-Def 2nd Team
Rookie of the Year 1971
7x All-Star


Elvin Hayes
Image
Hall of Fame (1990)
NBA Champion (1978)
3× All-NBA First Team Selection
3× All-NBA Second Team Selection
2x All-Defense Second Team Selections
12× All-Star

Dominique Wilkins
Image
Hall of Fame (2006)
1x All-NBA 1st Team
4x All-NBA 2nd Team
2x All-NBA 3rd Team
9x All-Star

Kevin McHale
Image
Hall of Fame 1999
3 NBA Championship Teams
1 All NBA 1st Team
3 All-Defense 1st Team
3 All-Defense 2nd Team
2 Sixth Man of the Year Awards
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,973
And1: 9,668
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#2 » by penbeast0 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:46 am

For the nomination:

PG -- It is between Kevin Johnson who was a very solid player in all respects though often injured, the surprisingly efficient Chauncey Billups, and possibly Lenny Wilkens from the 60s or the purely offensive Nate Archibald or Pete Maravich from the 70s. I lean to KJ for his all around game.

Wings -- On the wings, there are still great scorers left . . . I like Alex English's consistency and Ray Allen's 3 point shooting over the more spectacular but less consistent Bernard King, Mark Aquirre, or David Thompson, or the statistically most efficient Adrian Dantley. Paul Arizin, Sam Jones, and Hal Greer also should come into play reasonably soon --

Defensively, I love Moncrief (and Dumars and Bobby Jones have a shot too but Moncrief was the most dominant at his peak) though the shortness of his peak (5 years then a major falloff) is a big issue.

Big Men -- The bigs left all have some issue with their games. Zo had health issues and was always a step behind the best like Shaq/Robinson/Duncan/etc. while Neil Johnston and Mel Daniels played against inferior competition during their primes and were more limited besides. Bob McAdoo while his 5 year peak is spectacular, didn't play big man defense and his teams didn't dominate; Bob Lanier and Walt Bellamy had nice numbers but their teams weren't that much either and Detroit with Lanier sucked defensively for 9 of Lanier's 10 prime years which I consider pretty bad. Finally there is Dikembe Mutombo who was a great shot blocker and consistent player for years. Finally, Bill Walton had one great year (not that much better than Wes Unseld's MVP year) but every other year he broke down and left the Portland and San Diego teams which had built around him destroyed until he made another 1 year comeback as a top reserve. I wouldn't choose a one in eight shot at catching lightning in a bottle at the expense of a virtually guaranteed team crash the other seven over most of the above named players. Of them I lean Unseld.

At PF, Bobby Jones and Dennis Rodman may be the greatest pair of defensive forwards but Jones, while extremely efficient, didn't score or rebound that much while Rodman had no offense and for 1/2 his career, left his man at times to pad his rebounding stats at the team's expense. On the offensive end, Amare Stoudamire and Chris Webber just have too many issues to rank above Jones or Rodman.

Let me explain why I am voting for Sidney Moncrief here. His peak is short, only 5 full years from 82-86 and those years coincided with the peak years of both the Bird/McHale/Parish/DJ Celtics and of the Moses/Erving/Toney/Cheeks Sixers (as well as the Showtime Lakers) so he never made it past the ECF but in those peak years he led Milwaukee, a Don Nelson coached team with no consistent center, to be one of the best defensive and an above average offensive team. Individually he was a consistent 20ppg scorer with excellent passing and rebounding skills who is widely considered the greatest man-up perimeter defender to ever play winning the first two ever awarded DPOY awards in this 5 year stretch.

Milwaukee's leaguewide ratings, even in those years of great dynastic teams, were

82 Moncrief 6.7reb/4.8ast/19.8pts on .601ts% incredible for a guard before wide use of the 3pt shot
9th in offense, 1st! in defense -- Marques Johnson was the second star only scoring 16ppg, center was good offense, mediocre defensive aging Bob Lanier, the other biggest minutes were PG Quinn Buckner (excellent defender) and Brian Winters (offense only pure jump shooter)

93 Moncrief 5.8reb/3.9ast/22.5pts on .602ts% 1st DPOY award (82 was actually better defense)
10th in offense, 6th in defense -- Marques Johnson had a great year, Alton Lister replaced Bob Lanier

94 Moncrief 6.7reb/4.5ast/20.9pts on .591ts% 2nd DPOY award
12th in offense, 2nd in defense -- Lanier came back to split time with Lister and Marques's last year

95 Moncrief 5.4reb/5.2ast/21.7pts on .594ts%
6th in offense, 2nd in defense -- Terry Cummings took over for Marques as the other star, Lister split time with Randy Breuer at center, 3pt specialist Craig Hodges split time with Paul Pressey and Junion Bridgeman

96 Moncrief 4.6reb/4.9ast/20.2pts on .604ts%
4th in offense, 2nd in defense -- Breuer became the starter still splitting time, Pressey as point forward

Moncrief was an incredible two way player. In a slightly weaker era, he might have led his team to one or two championships like a Chauncey Billups or Isiah Thomas but the one year they beat the Celtics (with great performance by Sid), they then ran into the "fo fo fo" Sixer team. But he was the clearly acknowledged leader of Milwaukee teams and led them to terrific defensive performances despite average defensive big men (Cummings doesn't have a good rep but is underrated but before him the starter was journeyman Mickey Johnson though Don Nelson liked to use Marques Johnson as PF and play 3 guards more than using Johnson).


NOMINATE: Sidney Moncrief
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,973
And1: 9,668
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#3 » by penbeast0 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:56 am

Voting Candidates
We have two PGs on the board. Chris Paul has only played 5 years in the NBA and only 2 really peak years but those two were as impressive as any small guard who has ever played in the NBA. Bob Cousy, on the other hand, has 6 rings, 10 1st team All-NBA awards, an MVP, and was the games first great playmaker (Bob Davies possibly excepted). Paul's peak is so short it is hard to pick him over one of the all-time greats like Cousy but he's better offensively, defensively, and doesn't have his efficiency fall off a cliff in the playoffs as Cousy did in so many championship seasons.

Allen Iverson and Reggie Miller couldn't be more unalike as scorers. Iverson the super high volume, inefficient, undersized, bad practice, streetball superstar with accolades and endorsements everywhere; Miller the superefficient, come off of screens, playoff assassin with only 5 All-Star games in his long career and never better than 3rd team All-NBA. Neither were much defensively nor was Dominique Wilkins who is sort of Iverson-lite with a good attitude (not terribly efficient or versatile and a poor defender but a great scorer for a long time). I lean to Reggie for efficiency and playoff power.

Then you have the bigs. Cowens and Reed were early 70s stars with reasonably short careers and not great stats but who were recognized as MVP's for their leadership and hard nosed play. Elvin Hayes is stronger statistically and also a 70s champion but was known as a whiner rather than a leader. I am a big efficiency booster though and despite his weak rebounding, Kevin McHale is the only really efficient post scorer here and his defense is in the same ballpark as the other 3.

VOTE: tentatively Kevin McHale

I am very open to ElGee or one of the other guys who understands a lot more about advanced stats convincing me as I haven't yet solidified into one of these guys. I do appreciate good posts that disagree with me; even if I don't always buy into them.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#4 » by Fencer reregistered » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:03 am

I'm trying to figure out how good McHale REALLY was at guarding SFs.

Head-to-head is tricky, as those guys might have been guarded by McHale part of the game and Wedman another part, but it's what we have. Also, the head-to-head logs at Basketball Reference start with 1985-6, so we wouldn't want to use guys whose career started before McHale's. And the whole thing is hard to eyeball since the years never match up cleanly.

Anyhow, the Celtics didn't do anything in the McHale era to slow down 'Nique:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... =mchalke01

although they were pretty good at scoring on him too. (E.g., in that 54 point 'Nique game linked in the Pierce/Wilkins thread, McHale went for 12-16/12-16/36 points himself, and everybody knows about the Bird/'Nique playoff shootout.)

James Worthy, however, they held down more effectively.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... =mchalke01

Ditto Scottie Pippen:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... esc01.html

The stats for post-injury Bernard King are hard to eyeball, but it doesn't look like the Celtics had any special success defending him:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... =mchalke01

On the PF side, it looks like they had some minor success in slowing down a young Charles Barkley:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... lch01.html
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#5 » by Fencer reregistered » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:24 am

I'm going to vote Kevin McHale here.

To the eye test, McHale was one of the great post scorers ever. He shot over guys more and went around or through them less than some of the other greats, which may be why he didn't get to the FT line as much. But when he did, he sank his FTs like few other bigs. If he wasn't the first to go 60-80 in a season, he was close, and I'd guess few if any have done it since.

That McHale didn't pass much from the post doesn't bother me, as there's no evidence his failing to do so hurt the team. His FG% was high; his TOV wasn't.

If you compared McHale to a few other post scorers I thought to include -- Kareem, Hakeem, Shaq, and Duncan -- his numbers don't quite match theirs: http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 01&y5=2010 (Since McHale only went for 13 seasons, I restricted them to 13 seasons also.) He does beat them all in TS%, however, regular season and postseason alike. And his numbers are pretty good on their own merits, especially per-36.

As I've noted before, McHale played a lot of SF on defense (and in transition) and so his defensive rebounding numbers suffered accordingly. On the other hand, his offensive rebounding numbers were good, even if behind 3 of the 4 guys I compared him to above -- but they, after all, are all in the top 9 on our list.

I also think that position versatility on defense is a good thing for your team -- it allows a steadier rotation. E.g., the Celtics had former all-star Scott Wedman backing up two forward positions, because Bird & McHale could each defend whichever one (PF in modern terms) Wedman didn't.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,417
And1: 15,984
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#6 » by therealbig3 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:31 am

Vote: McHale

I'm pretty sure of this vote, but I can be persuaded. I just don't see how other guys have a bigger impact than him. He has a big impact on both sides of the ball. Great defender, a solid, if unspectacular rebounder, and one of the best post scorers ever. He wasn't a great passer from the post, but neither is Howard, and McHale is a poor man's Howard to me. Not even that much poorer, because he was a better scorer. Having a guy like McHale who you can always dump the ball to in the post, and count on him generating highly efficient offense is a huge asset to any team, and it certainly was for the Celtics. I just don't see any of the other nominees providing the two-way impact that McHale did.

Nominate: KJ

A little surprised that he hasn't gotten much noise. Didn't really have a weakness to his game, and he always ran a highly efficient offense. IMO, a prime KJ can stand next to all-time great PGs like Magic, Nash, Oscar, and Paul and could hold his own. Unfortunately, he didn't have the longevity that other all-time greats have, but at this point, peak seems to matter more than longevity anyway, since we've voted in Howard and nominated Paul. KJ has 6 20/10ish seasons...that's awesome.
ThaRegul8r
Head Coach
Posts: 6,448
And1: 3,034
Joined: Jan 12, 2006
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#7 » by ThaRegul8r » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:25 am

Fencer reregistered wrote:If he wasn't the first to go 60-80 in a season, he was close, and I'd guess few if any have done it since.


No one ever did it before or since, so he actually was the first to go 60-80.
I remember your posts from the RPOY project, you consistently brought it. Please continue to do so, sir. This board needs guys like you to counteract ... worthless posters


Retirement isn’t the end of the road, but just a turn in the road. – Unknown
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 52,766
And1: 21,701
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#8 » by Doctor MJ » Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:02 am

Vote: Reggie Miller

Ah. I've let ElGee take the brunt of the pro-Miller campaign lately. Let's see if I can add to the persuasion.

I think that people need to really think about the comparison with John Stockton. I think people expected Stockton to go about where he did, but expected Miller to go far lower. I ask the question: Why? Why is Stockton drastically ahead of Miller? I mean, if you really think Stockton should have been a strong MVP candidate all those years, okay, but if are rewarding him for being a top 10-ish level guys with a knack fitting well with other talent, I think you need to consider how that differs from Miller.

We've talked about Win Share leaders. Stockton is 5th all-time in the regular season, and this certainly relates to how he gets boosted up. Miller is 14th, and has arguably the most shocking ability to raise his game come playoff time of any player in history.

ElGee added in that Miller's teams consistently had huge offensive improvement come playoff time. Which is completely insane, and basically shows that this is a player that no matter the competition Miller could be a very effective volume scorer that lifted his team up. This is something that many, many volume scorers have a huge issue with. Par for the course is for them to lift a team only to the middle of the pack, but Reggie didn't have these issues at all.

What's that, he missed the all-star game half his prime? Well, yes, but the guys he was competing with aren't exactly mysteries to us. I'll do the obligatory mention that off-ball players accumulate less volume stats and are thus undervalued compared to on ball players who rack up numbers in categories they aren't particularly skilled in without creating the spacing a great off ball scorer can.

But really, do I even need to do that? I mean, WTF is any of us doing holding it against Miller that BJ Armstrong got an all-star nod over him? Obviously, that was just wrong. Don't give me "Well, he couldn't have been that much better than BJ if they confused the two." To use that level of incompetence in the all-star committee against Miller is a crime. Bottom line is that Miller's stats meant that he was always seen at a certain level which other hot names putting up gaudy numbers or playing on whiz bang teams would get the narrative over. And that love of narrative was always a bad thing.

Last: i want to point out the Miller vs Nique comparison again. I get the feeling people just aren't willing to look at this comparison. I tell you again: Go compare there playoff numbers. If you didn't know who these players were and just looked at their scoring volume in the playoffs, you'd assume they were comparable scoring stars. If you then looked at efficiency, you'd conclude that Miller had pretty dang huge scoring edge. If you were then told about Miller's tendency for the legendary come playoff time, his team's better playoff success, and the fact that his team's offense kept rising as he escalated his attack, it's hard for me to imagine you even taking the non-scoring stat differences seriously at all while siding with Miller.

If you took all that, and then learned that Indiana still loved Miller at age 39, and wanted him to stay even after that, while the Hawks washed their hands of Nique in his early 30s, it becomes a bit of a blow out.

I think people are starting with the regular season accolades, and then just giving Miller a little boost, and that's the wrong way to look at things. When a player consistently plays differently in the playoffs than in the regular season, you don't give him a playoff boost, you re-calibrate your analysis of the player based on how he appears when it truly matters. And when you do that, Miller comes out on top over Nique, and a whole slew of shot jacking volume scorers who chucked their way to all-star nods and fanboy acclaim throughout the years.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#9 » by Fencer reregistered » Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:47 am

Kevin McHale was a better player than Reggie Miller.

Again just comparing their first 13 seasons, they have comparable stats:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 01&y2=2000

But McHale was regarded as an excellent defender in his day, WITHOUT racking up big defensive stats. So it's safe to say the stats well undervalue him, while the same would not be true of Miller.

Just as I gave Howard the vote over McHale for being better defensively, despite being inferior in longevity, I'm going to give the nod to McHale over Miller in exactly the same way.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#10 » by Fencer reregistered » Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:55 am

Nominate: Paul Arizin :)
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
ronnymac2
RealGM
Posts: 11,003
And1: 5,070
Joined: Apr 11, 2008
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#11 » by ronnymac2 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:04 am

That's an awesome picture of Cousy. lol

I like McHale over Hayes. Defensively, both are co-anchor types more than anything. I prefer Hayes since he's a better shot-blocker and could play more minutes, but McHale closes the gap a bit with his versatility and ability to guard perimeter-oriented forwards. Offensively, it's McHale no question. The only value Hayes gives you is he shoulders your volume-scoring load at decent efficiency. However, I was pretty disappointed with his playoff production during the RPOY project. McHale was the better playoff performer, and although I adjust for McHale not being the first option like Hayes was most of the time, I don't see Hayes allowing himself to benefit from that type of help like McHale. McHale's efficiency advantage is too much too ignore.

Hayes has value, and his longevity is useful, but McHale's the higher peak player.

Paul is the best peak player here, but he's got longevity issues. I see CP3 having essentially three great seasons (top-5ish). Does he have the tiebreakers to vault him past guys with completed careers?

Reed is better than Cowens to me. Cowens may have been just as, if not more valuable than Reed to his own team, but Reed was the better player. Reed played outside a lot, too, and his efficiency was just fine.

RE: Miller
That Stockton comparison doesn't work for me, mainly because I'm not sure if I'd be voting for Stockton right now. He was voted at 31, but I personally might not even have him at 41.

Reggie gets underrated...really underrated first step, drew fouls at the rim, pesky defender, and he passed well (especially with post-entry passes). He wasn't a one-trick pony like some claim. But...I don't know. He didn't take on the role- the valuable role- that Nique and A.I. did for their teams. Being an on-ball player- an effective one- is hard to do, and you can't replace it easily.

I'll have to think about this. It's Paul/Iverson/Nique/Reed/McHale/Reggie for me, in no order yet.



As for the Nomination, it'll be between whoever has more support, Squid or McAdoo. Add Zo to this list as well.



Questions: Where is Nate Thurmond? Why the hell did Jerry Lucas get mentioned above Nate? Nate was clearly superior.

What about Penny Hardaway and Grant Hill? Were they that far below CP3?

James Worthy? He's been hotly debated in the past.

Is Kevin Durant top-100 yet?

If Bobby Jones and Dennis Rodman are being brought up, Dave DeBusschere should be as well. I'd personally take Rodman out of all three, but DeBusschere was a great, great two-way player. Smart. A prototype for the tall, shooting forward today. I would have taken Dave over Rashard Lewis on the 2009 and 2010 Magic. Perfect fit next to Dwight Howard- at least in this era.

Chauncey Billups, Marques Johnson, Alex English, and Adrian Dantley are coming up for me as well. Sam Jones. Hal Greer shouldn't be forgotten. Ben Wallace and Deke were great as well. Bob Lanier was a monster with some big-time playoffs. Ray-Ray, Manu, Vince, K.J....

I love his dunks and attitude, and criticize his game a lot, but what about Shawn Kemp? Dude actually doesn't have bad longevity.

Horace Grant is probably making my top-100 as well. Perfect role player type. Yeah buddy!!
Pay no mind to the battles you've won
It'll take a lot more than rage and muscle
Open your heart and hands, my son
Or you'll never make it over the river
User avatar
ronnymac2
RealGM
Posts: 11,003
And1: 5,070
Joined: Apr 11, 2008
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#12 » by ronnymac2 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:09 am

BTW, great post by PenBeast in the last thread regarding Unseld. I'm going to go look through the '69 RPOY thread soon, but I'm going on record as saying Unseld's MVP is legitimate and reasonable.
Pay no mind to the battles you've won
It'll take a lot more than rage and muscle
Open your heart and hands, my son
Or you'll never make it over the river
User avatar
ronnymac2
RealGM
Posts: 11,003
And1: 5,070
Joined: Apr 11, 2008
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#13 » by ronnymac2 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:15 am

ALso, Robert Parish is coming up for me. Peak is overlooked because of the staggering longevity.

Gus Williams, Jack Sikma, David Thompson, Spencer Haywood, Walt Bellamy, Connie Hawkins, Chris Webber, Mark Aguirre, George McGinnis, Paul Westphal, Billy Cunningham...
Pay no mind to the battles you've won
It'll take a lot more than rage and muscle
Open your heart and hands, my son
Or you'll never make it over the river
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#14 » by Fencer reregistered » Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:53 am

Guys I'd like to see come up at some point include but are hardly limited to:

KJ, DJ, Billups, Mo Cheeks

Squid, Jesus Shuttleworth, Sam Jones

Paul Arizin, James Worthy, Marques Johnson, Billy Cunningham, Grant Hill

Worm, Dolph Schayes

Chief, Zo, Big Ben, Walton, Unseld
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
Doormatt
RealGM
Posts: 17,438
And1: 2,013
Joined: Mar 07, 2011
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#15 » by Doormatt » Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:54 am

Pau Gasol anyone?
#doorgek
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#16 » by Fencer reregistered » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:29 am

Doormatt wrote:Pau Gasol anyone?


McHale's a little better by the numbers first 10 seasons, has a little more longevity, and is better on defense.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 01&y2=1990

Still, that wouldn't rule out Gasol making the top 60. Doesn't mean I really think he'll go there, but when I put it that way he feels very likely to make the list at some point.

Gasol looks better on the numbers than 'Nique, against whom he doesn't have a defensive disadvantage.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... 01&y2=1992

Gasol certainly has solid intangibles, on a couple of different kinds of teams. (As I've said many times, I give anybody a mulligan for shooting his way out of town once, as long as he plays hard while he's still there.)

Hmm ...
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,436
And1: 17,629
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#17 » by Snakebites » Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:06 pm

Vote: Wilkins
Nominate: Moncrief
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,859
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#18 » by drza » Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:48 pm

Gasol is definitely on my horizon, along with Rodman, Ginobili, Moncrief, Walton, McAdoo, Ray, and KJ. But it's past time that Mourning got nominated.

As for the vote, it's likely between Mchale, Nique and Iverson. On paper Mchale is more my kind of player, and I could shift to him, but for now I'll vote Nique. At the moment I can't escape that I felt that Nique was a better player at the time, and as yet I haven't been fully convinced to go Mchale here. Iverson's a dark horse here. Still intrigued by Hayes and Reed. The others could get into the mix, but they'd need some really good arguments.

Not sure what my access will be for the next 2 days, as I'll be traveling, so I'll put in a tentative vote that can be modified if I get access and a change of heart.

Vote: Dominique Wilkins
Nominate: Alonzo Mourning
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
User avatar
FJS
Senior Mod - Jazz
Senior Mod - Jazz
Posts: 18,789
And1: 2,157
Joined: Sep 19, 2002
Location: Barcelona, Spain
   

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#19 » by FJS » Sat Sep 17, 2011 2:50 pm

Vote Iverson
nominate Mourning
Image
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #40 

Post#20 » by Fencer reregistered » Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:50 pm

drza wrote: I felt that Nique was a better player at the time,


I felt the opposite, which informs how I'm voting too.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".

Return to Player Comparisons