Post#11 » by AdagioPace » Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:45 am
Those in the top 10 will be fine for decades and enjoy their status. Cracking the top 10 requires a combination of mvps,peak,prime,longevity,two way playing,RANGZ as the main guy (many >2) and finals mvps. Not even Curry and Durant would have a chance unless they win 4 rings in the next 4 years but even in that case the argument in favour of those above would still be strong enough.
Top 25 is more exciting!
There will be plenty of debate every year especially regarding those indistinguishable perimeter players like westbrook,harden,tmac,kobe,wade,jerry west,curry,oscar,cp3,durant,giannis?,kawhi?
I believe, as the players in that range with those features keep racking up, we'll see people giving increasingly more importance to rings and success in general as tiebreakers
Embiid,AD,KAt, (maybe!!) have the potential to get to the border of the top 10 (KG-like resume).
But how many of them will win,if any at all? how much? How many of them wil be able to be clutch and perform at the same level regardless of the style and SRS of the opponent and degree of pressure in the playoffs?
But the most important consideration of all: we're in the era of "superteams" and fans,analysts,commentators will have to face the challenge of evaluating a player's legacy that's been influenced by playing with another mvp caliber player. A tougher challenge than simply Kobe-Shaq (who indipendently proved themselves too) or KG-Pierce-Allen (KG clearly the most impactful player of the 3).
This is something new.
"La natura gode della natura; la natura trionfa sulla natura; la natura domina la natura" - Ostanes