RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,506
And1: 8,141
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#1 » by trex_8063 » Sun Jul 23, 2017 9:52 pm

1. Michael Jordan
2. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
3. Lebron James
4. Bill Russell
5. Tim Duncan
6. Wilt Chamberlain
7. Magic Johnson
8. Shaquille O'Neal
9. Hakeem Olajuwon
10. Larry Bird
11. Kobe Bryant
12. Kevin Garnett
13. Oscar Robertson
14. Karl Malone
15. Jerry West
16. Julius Erving
17. Dirk Nowitzki
18. ????

Get it on! (wish photobucket hadn't changed their 3rd-party hosting rules so I can't use fun pics anymore)

eminence wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

Colbinii wrote:.

Texas Chuck wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dr Spaceman wrote:.

fpliii wrote:.

Hornet Mania wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

SactoKingsFan wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

JordansBulls wrote:.

RSCS3_ wrote:.

BasketballFan7 wrote:.

micahclay wrote:.

ardee wrote:.

RCM88x wrote:.

Tesla wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

MyUniBroDavis wrote:.

kayess wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

MisterHibachi wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

mischievous wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

Bad Gatorade wrote:.

andrewww wrote:.

colts18 wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Cyrusman122000 wrote:.

Winsome Gerbil wrote:.

Narigo wrote:.

wojoaderge wrote:.

TrueLAfan wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.

Outside wrote:.

scabbarista wrote:.

janmagn wrote:.

lebron3-14-3 wrote:.

Arman_tanzarian wrote:.

oldschooled wrote:.

Pablo Novi wrote:.

john248 wrote:.

mdonnelly1989 wrote:.

Senior wrote:.

twolves97 wrote:.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
mischievous
General Manager
Posts: 7,675
And1: 3,485
Joined: Apr 18, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#2 » by mischievous » Sun Jul 23, 2017 10:42 pm

Not sure who i'm going with here. Was initially thinking Moses, but i'm not all that sure he was better than Robinson. He has the longevity, but Drob was better over a 5-7 year prime and that's pretty significant. I think Wade belongs in the mix too, worse longevity than the other 2, but i'd take him for peak over them, and he has a pretty strong resume and body of work overall. Between those 3 for me definitely. Barkley deserves a mention, but I don't see myself voting for him before the other 3.
JoeMalburg
Pro Prospect
Posts: 885
And1: 520
Joined: May 23, 2015
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#3 » by JoeMalburg » Sun Jul 23, 2017 11:06 pm

Seems like a three horse race here. Admiral, Round Mound and Fo Fo Foses.

So I want to think about Barkley vs. Robinson and the postseason.

K. Malone vs. Robinson H2H
http://bkref.com/tiny/DWHPn

K. Malone vs. Barkley H2H
http://bkref.com/tiny/c8njD

Barkley vs. Robinson
http://bkref.com/tiny/YGlUu

To me if you're going to look past Moses, that means you prefer a more traditional franchise guy to the Vagabond, monosyllabic Prep to pro.

In that case I think Robinson vs. Barkley comes down to whether or not you think that competitive furioscity Barkley brought to the table overshadows the more reluctant alpha Robinson and his far superior discipline and physical attributes.

So what say you Real GM?
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,599
And1: 24,920
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#4 » by 70sFan » Sun Jul 23, 2017 11:18 pm

I would like to see somebody knowledgeable enough to focus more on Moses and his impact. I believe he's underrated offensively but I also see that he's terribly inconsistent on defense. I also think his 1977 and 1978 seasons doesn't get enough credit. He has quite long prime.
mdonnelly1989
Head Coach
Posts: 6,351
And1: 1,744
Joined: Aug 11, 2014
       

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#5 » by mdonnelly1989 » Sun Jul 23, 2017 11:39 pm

70sFan wrote:I would like to see somebody knowledgeable enough to focus more on Moses and his impact. I believe he's underrated offensively but I also see that he's terribly inconsistent on defense. I also think his 1977 and 1978 seasons doesn't get enough credit. He has quite long prime.


VOTE: #1. Moses Malone

Moses Malone was a part of one of the greatest teams of all time, and may have at that time been more of a focal point of that team then Dr. J was. Also I heard Malone completely dominated Kareem in their head to head matchup.

VOTE #2. Admiral


One of the top 15 peaks of all time, better then Moses at their peak, but also needed the GOAT PF of all time and Coach Pop to get a ring.
mischievous
General Manager
Posts: 7,675
And1: 3,485
Joined: Apr 18, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#6 » by mischievous » Sun Jul 23, 2017 11:43 pm

mdonnelly1989 wrote:
70sFan wrote:I would like to see somebody knowledgeable enough to focus more on Moses and his impact. I believe he's underrated offensively but I also see that he's terribly inconsistent on defense. I also think his 1977 and 1978 seasons doesn't get enough credit. He has quite long prime.


VOTE: #1. Moses Malone

Moses Malone was a part of one of the greatest teams of all time, and may have at that time been more of a focal point of that team then Dr. J was. Also I heard Malone completely dominated Kareem in their head to head matchup.

VOTE #2. Admiral


One of the top 15 peaks of all time, better then Moses at their peak, but also needed the GOAT PF of all time and Coach Pop to get a ring.

What's your reasoning for these guys over Barkley? Not that i disagree, but just curious.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,007
And1: 9,693
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#7 » by penbeast0 » Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:30 am

Doctor MJ wrote:...

I think that I, like most people, have been penalizing Robinson to some degree out of being "punked". By Hakeem, by Shaq, and really, by Duncan as well. Analyses of Robinson tend to focus a lot on those who topped him, and while that doesn't sound unreasonable, the reality is that Robinson's "un-Jordanian" attributes took place in high profile, memorable ways.

But no one we're discussing right now is up there with Hakeem, Shaq, or Duncan.

...


Actually, there is one more Hakeem, Shaq, Duncan level of dominance big left. George Mikan was the great two-way player of the early NBA. He put up Jordan level scoring numbers (relative to his peers), great rebounding, and from all reports, was the dominant defender of the early 50s as well. He dominated physically with his strength and athleticism (he wasn't appreciably taller than his peer, but he was built strong . . . like Shaq v. Shawn Bradley wasn't about height). He won consistently, almost every year during his prime. He is the only truly dominant player left.

I can see not voting for him, I can't see him not being at least in the discussion at this point. Everyone should at least weigh in on where/why they feel he should go.

Vote: George Mikan

Of the remaining players, I still have doubt about David Robinson's playoffs, though drza does point out that his impact is still impressive defensively even if not as impressive as the regular season. Moses was a deeply flawed player that transcended those flaws . . . not a rim defender, poor passer out of the post, not a great basketball IQ, but the hardest working man in the NBA who attacked every rebound and pounded the ball into the basket consistently. Bob Pettit also has claim to that title, consistently outworking bigger, heavier opponents to be the greatest player and scorer between Mikan and Russell/Wilt . . . and maintaining a level of play into the mid 60s that made him a top 5 player in the league, better than the more publicized Elgin Baylor. Like Robinson, his playoff performance, at least what we can measure, tended to slip badly but he made up for it with one of the greatest playoff games of all times to beat the Celtics dynasty, something only he and Wilt can say. [url];t=22s[/url] Kevin Durant is a better version of Dirk, adding the ability to play on the wing and slightly better at the things Dirk did so well, but for a shorter time

Those are my main candidates. Wade, Gervin, and Drexler are probably the main wing candidates now; Stockton, Frazier, and Paul (Curry?) the main PGs, probably in those orders, but I can't see them over most of the bigs I have discussed. Overall, I have to go with David Robinson. He carried weak Spurs teams a long way during his prime pre-Duncan. He is a great second banana if there is a prime scorer with his defense and all around game. His attitude is outstanding. The playoff drop is real and the reason I haven't supported him up to now but I don't see anyone other than Mikan who can do better either with a weak team or with a strong one. Maybe with a Iverson 2001 combination of outstanding defenders/weak scoring/great coaching you could win more easily with a Durant or Barkley but otherwise, I have to go with the Admiral.

Second Choice David Robinson
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,506
And1: 8,141
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#8 » by trex_8063 » Mon Jul 24, 2017 1:35 am

oldschooled wrote:
LA Bird wrote:1. Dirk Nowitzki
A top 5 offensive GOAT who is not a complete disaster on defense (see Barkley). Dirk has great longevity and ranks very highly in both box score based stats as well as plus minus stats. Consistently excellent team win % throughout his prime and performs well in the playoffs. To a certain extent, I think Dirk's offensive style was so diametrically different from how PFs were traditionally supposed to play that many were more intent on scrutinizing any potential shortcomings of him as a player rather than look at what he actually achieved throughout his career.

2. David Robinson
Weak longevity is the only reason why DRob is so low. I rank him very highly (#2 player in the 90s) and he would have been a lock for top 10 had he not started so late as a rookie and missed the 92/97 seasons.


Ok where did this come from since you're comparing him with Dirk regarding defense.




I’d been meaning to do some scouting wrt Barkley’s defense, as it’s an important part of the debate at this point. I just fully scouted the entire game vs the Bulls from ‘91 in this video:



…...Making notes for every single defensive possession to get an idea of what [presumably] is a typical defensive performance from prime Barkley.
I’ll be grading his performance on each and every play (with description of the play and time-log) mostly on a scale of:
“Neutral” - doesn't do anything overly wrong, but isn’t appreciably good in any way. You might think of this as adequate/barely adequate, or reasonable expectation from a mediocre/average defender.
“Good” - fairly self-explanatory (better than neutral, in which he exhibits some commendable effort or awareness, or both, which helps his team on that defensive possession)
“Poor” - again fairly self-explanatory wherein effort, awareness, or defensive decision-making (or any combination of the three) is lacking to the point that it visibly hurts (or could have hurt, as I’m not focusing on the result of the play) the team’s defensive possession.
Sometimes things are on the cusp of good or poor, where I might give a grade of “Neutral to poor” or “Neutral to good”. Very rarely I may award grades of “Excellent” or “Terrible” for plays that are rather special in one direction or the other.

My analysis probably doesn’t contain quite the insight someone like Blackmill or drza may be capable of, but you can review video for yourself.

General note: he splits his time primarily between Pippen or Grant in this game (I would say guarding Pippen perhaps 55-60% of the time, Grant ~40-45%). I included every single play in the following log, even the ones he basically wasn’t involved with (generally just grading them “neutral”) except for maybe 1-2 non-involved plays in the early going.


8:45 - Fairly good rotation to cover Grant on the baseline. Neutral to Good.

10:50 - Not really involved in the play. Neutral.

11:29 - Sagging somewhat far off Pippen, fwiw, but probably wise as Pippen is not an effective distance shooter in ‘91. Decent position for DReb, but otherwise not really involved in this play. Neutral.

12:05 - Lackadaisical in chasing Pippen, bumps into a Cartwright screen and makes NO effort to fight thru and recover his man. Pippen gets WIDE open 17-footer (makes it). Poor.

13:16 - Good aggressive low-post defense on Pippen around start of the play, denies deep post-up and also denies the entry pass. But then doesn’t show/help at all on Grant when Pippen sets a back-pick on Gilliam (Barkley seems completely oblivious of what was happening); Grant then gets an uncontested lay-up underneath. Neutral to Poor (honestly I feel I’m being generous with that grade; giving it the “Neutral to…” grade simply because he does start out the possession with some decent defense on his man.

13:40 - Good hustle back in semi-transition (from baseline in-bound, though). Otherwise uninvolved in the play. Neutral.

14:20 - Obtains the DReb, though hadn’t really boxed out well. Neutral.

15:10 - Somewhat slow coming back in semi-transition, but a decent box-out this time. Neutral.

17:10 - Picks up Paxson on a switch, but *stays backed way off, leaving Pax way too much room (so he shoots); weak/minimal contest on the 19-20 foot jumper (though luckily Paxson misses). *Note: Barkley looks “engaged” on this play (i.e. doesn’t appear to be a lack of effort); so the fact that he still so misplays it (as though Paxson is a threat on the drive and not a threat from the midrange and outside) potentially demonstrates a low defensive IQ (it’s certainly a mental error, at any rate). Poor.

17:35 - Barkley gets stripped on O, then gives up the uncontested dunk in transition by Jordan. Barkley was essentially running right next to him the whole way down; had every opportunity to foul (even BEFORE it would be a shooting foul, as there’s no “clear path” rule in ‘91). Now I understand that Barkley may be generally advised to avoid foul trouble (because they need him on offense), and maybe he had that in mind, which is why I won’t give this an outright grade of “poor”.....but it’s otherwise a pretty bad play. Neutral to poor.

18:05 - Fair/decent chasing Pippen off-ball. Somewhat weak box-out, though does get the DReb (it practically hits him in the mouth). Neutral.

18:28 - This play starts out really good for Barkley. Initially hustles back well in semi-transition, moves his feet well to cut off Pippen’s initial penetration attempt, then denies the entry pass to Grant. But then he doesn’t move his feet well on the 2nd penetration attempt by Pippen and gets beat; the defense collapses and breaks down as a result, with teammates rotating to pick up Pippen, allowing a kick-out to a wide open Paxson for a 3PA (made). Neutral to Poor (not giving it an outright “poor” grade because he does some things very well at first; however, it ultimately was his defensive failing that results in the complete collapse of the team D).

20:20 - Somewhat weak box-out on Pippen; ALMOST gives up the OReb. Neutral (being a pinch generous there, as I may have been a pinch harsh on the previous grade).

20:50 - Did get the DReb, but not hard-fought, and generally not involved in the play. Neutral.

21:18 - Loses track of Pippen, who slips inside to get the OReb. Poor.


Side-note: Awesome transition dunk by Jordan at 22:00 (replay at 22:45). Happens so fast you don’t appreciate how good it is).


23:28: Decent off ball, though mostly uninvolved; gets in position for rebound, though. Neutral.

25:40 - Kinda loses King on the back-cut (if Cartwright were a better high-post passer, he might have burned Barkley for that). Barkley does then box-out nicely and get the DReb, though. Neutral (perhaps a pinch generous there).


**Side-note: Hand checking foul at 28:00, just to show that they did get called even before more recent rule changes.**


28:30 - Almost some really good help-D at the rim on the Jordan penetration. I think if he’d had BOTH hands up, there maybe wouldn’t have been a call (but his right hand was down, brushing on Jordan’s shoulder area, and thus gets called for foul). Decent box-out on the FTA. Neutral.

30:30 - Is in OK position for rebounding, but Stacey King still comes away with OReb for Bulls to reboot. Subsequently shows decent help off-ball on King. The mistake was by Bol, imo, who sort of left Barkley to defend BOTH King and Grant; so the bad result (an And1 for Jordan) was not Barkley’s fault. Neutral.

31:40 - Barkley fails to box-out (again), allowing King to get the OReb. Luckily Bol defends the rim really well on this play. Poor.

33:28 - Shades Armstrong nicely on the pnp, recovers to Grant adequately, then moves his feet well to cut off penetration by Grant; then shows just a little at Pippen on the subsequent kick-out and penetration attempt, forcing a pull-up jumper by Pippen (misses, Barkley gets the DReb, but then loses the inbound as he was falling out of bounds). Good.

34:30 - Nothing bad comes of it, but he almost completely fails to get a body on Grant, who slips inside for the OReb position. Neutral to Poor.

36:55 - Drifts way too far into the middle when (and I don’t see a good reason why), leaving Grant a WIDE open 13-footer on the baseline (made). Poor.

37:45 - Decent to good show initially on the cutting Pippen, though you can see he then loses his man (Grant) toward the end of the play (luckily nothing comes of it because Pippen travels). Neutral to Poor.

38:25 - Mostly uninvolved in the play. Neutral.

39:15 - Not much involved in play. Generally adequate, though again a little weak on the box-out. Neutral.

47:15 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.

49:10 - Loses Pippen on a back-pick that he didn’t see coming (a little of the blame could be on the guy guarding the back-picker), Pippen then gets good OReb position. Neutral to Poor.

50:15 - Slow getting back in semi-transition. Neutral to Poor.

52:00 - Mostly uninvolved again, though on the shot he again sort of wanders toward the rim without boxing out (which I’m noting is a trend). Neutral (could give this more of a “neutral to poor” tbh).

52:30 - Good getting back in semi-transition, adequate though uninvolved thereafter. Neutral.

53:21 - Mostly uninvolved; perhaps could have made a little more effort/attempt to help on the MJ drive, but it’s a bit of a gray area. Neutral.

56:05 - Sagged off Pippen, goes under a very distant (far from Pippen) screen and allows a wide open 18-footer (misses, Barkley does get the rebound). Neutral to Poor.

57:00 - Uninvolved. Neutral.

57:38 - Loses track of Pippen on the baseline in the middle of the play (luckily nothing comes of it). Does make a nice tip to Bol on the ping-ponging DReb. Neutral to Poor.

59:00 - Not too involved in this play. However, it was again a sort of weak box-out and he also made no attempt to help on a cutting Jordan (though nothing came of it). Neutral to Poor.

59:35 - Good hustle back on D. Adequate thereafter. Neutral.

59:58 - Looks a touch lost at times, but mostly OK, and does get the DReb. Neutral.

1:01:00 - Again misplays Paxson: he appears more concerned with Paxson driving on the sideline pnp, and leaves him a open 20-footer (made). It all happens kinda fast, so I don’t want to fault him too badly. Neutral to Poor.

1:02:05 - Sort of weird on this play: he kinda takes off for the other end (cherry picking a fast-break opportunity??) before the shot even goes up, allowing his man (Pippen) to cut toward the rim unguarded. Poor.

1:02:30 - Kinda mediocre hustle back in transition, but otherwise OK. Neutral.

1:03:55 - Tracks Pippen pretty well off-ball, and good help to cut off the Jordan drive. But is then quite lackadaisical in recovering to Pippen on the kick-out 16-footer, doesn’t contest the shot at all (made). Neutral to Poor.

1:05:05 - Again gets trapped behind a screen, makes little effort to fight thru. Gilliam is subsequently a little late switching off. I’m not sure who’s more at fault here. Fwiw, I hadn’t noticed a consistent trend of switching on screens (so Gilliam is perhaps absolved from that standpoint, imo); could have been better communication on both their parts. Pippen gets another open jumper which he makes. Neutral to Poor.

1:06:10 - Smooth switch (w/ Gilliam) from Pippen to Grant early in play. Comes out and makes a nice contest on the 20-footer by Paxson. Good.

1:07:05 - Doing reasonably well early in this possession, but then just goes rogue out on the wing late in the play. Bol then has to rotate down to cover Barkley’s man (Grant) on the strongside block, leaving Cartwright a WIDE open 13-footer on the opposite baseline (he misses, but Grant gets the offensive rebound). Poor.

1:07:35 - Almost loses track of Pippen under the hoop again. Makes up for it by fighting hard for DReb tip. Neutral.

1:08:20 - Decent help on Jordan on PnR defense, and nearly pokes away the dribble). Good.

1:08:50 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.

1:09:50 - Good rotation out on Paxson, and forces him to put it on the floor. Could have moved his feet a little better, but gambles on a strip attempt. Neutral to Good (probably being overly generous here).

1:11:15 - Mostly uninvolved, though does appear to box-out reasonably well this time. Neutral.

1:12:10 - Uninvolved. Neutral.

1:12:30 - Uninvolved. Neutral.

1:16:50 - Great block on the help D. Excellent.

1:17:51 - Miscommunication between Barkley and Williams on switch, allows Cartwright an easy post-up and entry pass. Barkley defends OK on the post shot. Not sure who’s more at fault. Neutral to Poor.

1:18:30 - Good contest on the Hopson drive (though it does leave Grant un-boxed out). Neutral to Good.

1:19:33 - Another good help-D block attempt on Jordan drive (unfortunately Williams fouls MJ). Good.

1:22:20 - King scores, but Barkley did rotate to help fairly quickly and contested the shot fairly hard. Neutral to Good.

1:23:00 - Shows a little at the penetrator, though loses inside position to Grant in doing so. Neutral.

1:23:18 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.

1:27:35 - Reasonably decent help on the pnp, shading the ball-handler. Neutral to Good.

1:28:20 - OK help on a cutting Hopson when Hawkins lost him. Neutral to Good.

1:28:45 - Terrible hustle: barely comes back on defense at all, leaving a 5-on-4 for most of the possession. Poor.

1:29:46 - Mostly uninvolved in what actually happened, though he sort of loses track of Pippen on the baseline again (though no consequence). He also didn’t really contest the inbound pass at all. Neutral to Poor.

1:30:50 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.

1:31:40 - Good job staying in front of Pippen, cutting off the penetration, and harrying the dribble. Good.

1:33:05 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.

1:33:40 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.
1:34:10 - Mostly uninvolved, though decent hustle back on D. Neutral.

1:34:40 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.

1:35:20 - Mostly uninvolved, though attention on Pippen in the post is a little lacking. Ball ends up going out of bounds (off Philly), leaving Chicago with a short shotclock in-bound situation, and Barkley does contest the inbound well. Neutral overall.

1:36:50 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.

1:37:30 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.

1:38:36 - Fairly basic, but did show decent help to cut off Jordan penetration, and is in position for rebounding. Neutral to Good.

1:42:00 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.

1:42:40 - Mostly uninvolved. Neutral.


SUMMARY (for those who don't want all the nitty gritty)
Few general observations….
*Barkley’s attention/awareness is sometimes lacking, especially the longer the possession lasts if he’s been involved (i.e. multiple times in which he starts out doing pretty well, but then seems to lose focus late in the play, essentially erasing the good defense he’d played to that point).
**Handful of clear mental errors, which imo potentially indicate a less than admirable defensive IQ.
***Somewhat consistently is NOT boxing out for defensive rebounds. He tends to more just drift toward the rim, rather relying on his athleticism to garner him the rebounds (but were multiple instances where Pippen or Grant slipped inside him because he wasn’t seeking to put a body on anyone).

Total side-note: one commentator was really effusive in his praise of Stacey King, making comments along the lines of “really hard worker”, “can run the floor”, and “is like a slim Wayman Tisdale”......comments that seems really surprising knowing how King’s career (and physique) ultimately turned out.

TOTALS:
Excellent Plays - 1 (1.3%)
Good Plays - 5 (6.6%)
Neutral-to-Good Plays - 7 (9.2%)
Neutral Plays (adding 1, since I know there was at least one neutral play early on that I disregarded because he was largely uninvolved in what transpired) - 40 (52.6%)
Neutral-to-Poor Plays - 15 (19.7%)
Poor Plays - 8 (10.5%)

So overall, I rated 17.1% of his defensive possessions as at least slightly above average, while 30.3% were at least slightly below average, with the rest being basically average. NOTE: that’s including all uninvolved plays (which inflates the number of “neutral” or average plays). If I remove all neutral plays in which basically there’s nothing to note (uninvolved), that eliminates 17 of those plays (making 22.0% of those remaining “above average/neutral”, and 39.0% “below average/neutral”).

==>Also note that there were a handful of grades where I felt I was being marginally generous.


Man! This kind of scouting (and report) does take awhile to put together. I can see why people so rarely do it. Fwiw, I did also watch part of game 7 of the ‘86 ECSF between Sixers/Bucks. My impression from that (wrt Barkley’s defense) was similar.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
User avatar
RCM88x
RealGM
Posts: 15,170
And1: 19,116
Joined: May 31, 2015
Location: Lebron Ball
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#9 » by RCM88x » Mon Jul 24, 2017 2:04 am

I actually made a mistake in the #16 vote including Moses as my #2, it should have been Dirk. So...

1st Vote: Admiral

2nd Vote: Moses Malone

I will try to edit this soon an include my argument.
Image

LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.
User avatar
Narigo
Veteran
Posts: 2,775
And1: 869
Joined: Sep 20, 2010
     

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#10 » by Narigo » Mon Jul 24, 2017 3:20 am

Vote: David Robinson
Second Vote: Charles Barkley


Robinson had a top 10 peak and a great prime. Arguably the best player on the 99 Spurs. Looks great in almost every advanced statistic including RAPM. Excellent two way player. Arguably the best defender since Russell
Narigo's Fantasy Team

PG: Damian Lillard
SG: Sidney Moncrief
SF:
PF: James Worthy
C: Tim Duncan

BE: Robert Horry
BE:
BE:
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,398
And1: 16,278
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#11 » by Dr Positivity » Mon Jul 24, 2017 3:22 am

Thank you trex for doing all that work!

Case for David Robinson: All time great defensive player at the most defensive position C, gives him a high baseline before even getting to offense where he's good enough to win scoring title, spaces floor and passes. Stellar advanced stats after his injury help lengthen his quantity of star level years. Great intangibles. Amazing portability. Case against: Longevity even when taking into account the post prime seasons, still isn't the best on board especially after docking him for 92 playoff miss. Drop-off in playoff stats could reflect his regular season offensive statistics aren't quite reflective of his offensive weaknesses compared to other options available here.

Case for Charles Barkley: Astounding offensive resume for a big between his scoring/volume efficiency combo, offensive rebounding and bigs who handle, pass and floor space tend to do well beyond their boxscore in +/-. Houston Barkley rates as best offensive player in the league level in ORAPM which is a sign the Sixers and Suns version is likely what he appears to be in offensive impact. Offensive game translated well to playoffs including some mega performances. Quality longevity with an 11 year prime and then is still a meaningful player afterwards. Case against: Defensively lacking as at a big man position, with horrible DRAPM in Houston as a worrying sign for the rest of his career. Offensive game may not have been the easiest to build a defense around, with possibility of him being trailing behind play after scoring on fastbreak or going for offensive rebound. Injuries hurt his value in Houston. Overall weak leadership compared to the standards of other players here.

Case for Moses Malone: Respect in his time as 3x MVP. Voted best player on a team with Erving on it.Great playoff performer including dragging a limited team to the Finals, winning the title the next year and beating up on Kareem multiple times. Makes all-defensive teams at the most key defensive position, even if good not great on D, this gives him more value on D than many great perimeter defenders. Good longevity as all-star level player making ASG from 78-89. Case against: Non facilitating big man which makes it difficult to run offense through compared to other offense first superstars. Only average floor spacing. Anchored poor defenses in Houston possibly reflective of difficulty of having the energy to play at all-D level when he had to carry the offense. Longevity as a megastar player instead of just an all-star, not quite as long as other options available. Value of offensive rebounding may not be as valuable as voters thought at the time, if it comes at the cost of transition D.

Case for Dwyane Wade: Stellar RAPM peak reaching the top of the league and close several other times. Playing highly valuable role as playmaking guard combined with his production allowed him to have a truly elite offensive value at his peak. High level playoff credibility by carrying Heat to 06 title and other performances like 11 Finals and 10 1st round. Great defender by SG standards. Case against: Limited longevity with only about 5 healthy prime seasons and several other very good ones, but not at the level of say post prime Robinson. Average portability as a non 3pt shooting SG. Defensive value lowered by playing an offensive position.

Case for George Mikan: Achieved true dominance, especially on defense which is highly valuable at center while being best in the league offensively for a time. Did all you could ask him to do. Case against: Did it in shotclock era without black players and his most dominant years 49-51 most likely even worse comp than the later shotclock. Poor longevity with 6 years of real value.

Case for Bob Pettit: Great playoff performer who proved it against the hardest of competition in the Celtics, infamously dropped 50 on them in a close out game. Has floor spacing value. Toughness/intangibles helps set stage. Continued to put up great stats into early 60s even at an older age, showing he likely wasn't less suited to his era than peers like West, Oscar, Baylor. Quality prime longevity as he comes in productive and keeps it up for a decade plus. Case against: Average defensive value at a big man position. Lacks virtually any post prime years to pad his longevity. His TS is good but more like +.3-.4 above average than the truly elite numbers players like West and Oscar posted compared to their eras. Scoring volume not as high as the raw stats say when you take into account pace. Overall Pettit scoring volume+efficiency combo is good, but more like prime Love than Barkley. Competition level is overall less impressive to dominate than other eras.

Overall I have been swayed towards picking Robinson here based on valuing his post injury seasons. Even if he doesn't come up as big in the playoffs offensively, less of his game is reliant on offense than players like Barkley and Moses anyways. Just by being there and playing defense, floor spacing, passing, etc. he's already making a high baseline of value.

Vote David Robinson

2nd: Charles Barkley
Liberate The Zoomers
User avatar
oldschooled
Veteran
Posts: 2,800
And1: 2,710
Joined: Nov 17, 2012
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#12 » by oldschooled » Mon Jul 24, 2017 3:31 am

As explained in previous thread, I'll take Sir Charles's elite offensive anchoring over David's elite defensive anchoring. Charles proved to anchor his team consistently regular season through post season. Too close too call.

Vote: Sir Charles
Alt: Admiral
Frank Dux wrote:
LeChosen One wrote:Doc is right. The Warriors shouldn't get any respect unless they repeat to be honest.


According to your logic, Tim Duncan doesn't deserve any respect.
andrewww
General Manager
Posts: 7,989
And1: 2,687
Joined: Jul 26, 2006

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#13 » by andrewww » Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:06 am

Vote: David Robinson
Alternate: Charles Barkley


I think Admiral's offense (the "weaker" side of his game in terms of offense vs defense) compared to Chuck's is much less than Chuck's defense compared to one of the GOAT defenders.
User avatar
Joao Saraiva
RealGM
Posts: 13,340
And1: 6,141
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
   

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#14 » by Joao Saraiva » Mon Jul 24, 2017 8:27 am

I haven't voted for him and I've been waiting for him to get more traction but...

How long is Mikan going to be ignored? He dominated his era. Even if it was weaker, it's not his fault he played in that era.

I've also seen people who say they don't care much about portability (myself included) but then Mikan is almost out of the top 20? It doesn't make a lot of sense.

Dude won everything he should in his own era, has the stats to back him up...

I don't feel really confident with voting for him, but I feel he should be getting in. Anyone want to make a case for him?

I'll vote a few hours later...

Looking into Sir Charles, David Robinson, Moses Malone and Mikan.

Haven't got 2 of them yet with my formula (Moses and Mikan) but I don't feel it's a good way to measure Mikan. I'm interested, however, in seeing where Moses gets on it, so that's what I'll be working on.
“These guys have been criticized the last few years for not getting to where we’re going, but I’ve always said that the most important thing in sports is to keep trying. Let this be an example of what it means to say it’s never over.” - Jerry Sloan
User avatar
Senior
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,821
And1: 3,673
Joined: Jan 29, 2013

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#15 » by Senior » Mon Jul 24, 2017 8:47 am

At some point we're going to need to have the Mikan/era discussion (penbeast has been the only guy supporting Mikan to this point and we've all kinda just been dodging the question). Relative to his era his dominance should've put him in already, but...well, you know. Problem is, the arguments for/against are kinda nebulous so Mikan's place in an all-time list could be literally anywhere. He should be recognized at SOME point...maybe not right now, but somewhere in this list before it ends. I don't really know where to start, to be honest.

Barkley's defense is really holding him back. He's kind of like James Harden where his awareness/defensive IQ is bad and he's constantly causing breakdowns/forcing his team to cover for him...except he's in the FC where he hurts his team even more. He has some nice defensive traits - good rebounding, could pull the chair on people, decent steals/blocks amount (and as with J he was a transition killer) but bad defense will sink almost any contender. As with Malone, people want to point to MJ in the Finals as an excuse for why Barkley never won...and it ignores the fact that Chuck lost plenty of other years and his lackluster defense was a big part of that. MJ and Hakeem tore his teams apart, and even guys without all-time offense like D-Rob, Malone, Pippen, and Shawn Kemp saw their offense go through the roof in a playoff series against Barkley. Barkley's conditioning/health was also pretty suspect and it's well-known that his discipline was lacking, so that could have hampered his effort. Even more similar to Malone, he had his chance to win with MJ gone in 94-95 but the Suns blew 2-0 and 3-1 leads to the Rockets.

Still, his offense is amazing and has him above Moses for the moment. Almost guaranteed double team, great ballhandling, offensive rebounding, could hit FTs, great passer, decent jumper (took too many threes though in the mid 90s due to his health), almost guaranteed finisher (iirc his finishing rate at his peak was like 80%, always went up with 2 hands). His offense against the 90 Bulls vs MJ/Pip/Grant is insane and iirc that team was pretty weak spacing-wise. I'd rather have Barkley than Moses any day on offense even if Moses scores more. Moses wasn't the passer Barkley was and that's a huge issue for any offensive anchor.

I do think Moses is a smidge underrated though - his offense was a bit more varied than typically characterized and despite coming onto a stacked team in the 82 Sixers to win the title he fit with that team perfectly. His rebounding numbers are a tiny bit overrated though - in addition to the statpadding (overstated imo, that sequence of intentionally missing for the OREB didn't happen a majority of the time) his teams weren't great rebounding-wise for some reason. It's possible the Rockets around him just stunk at rebounding but a guy who dominates offensive rebounding to that degree should be doing something similar on the other end as well, no? I'm not really sure what happened after 83 - the Celtics kind of just barged in and maybe the 83 Sixers got the title at the right time because their core was getting old; Erving was 32, Jones 31. They were finished after 1985 (nice 58 win season though, ended by Boston) with Toney's feet betraying him and trading away Moses.

Interestingly, the contender-level Sixers consistently had expected W-L records drastically under (like 5-6 wins under on average) their actual W-L record...that usually means they won a lot of close games or got blown out more than they should've. Whatever reason, it's possible those W-Ls overstated their actual ability. The poster Outside in previous threads mentioned that the Sixers didn't really have much of a system and that could play a factor - the stacked talent on those teams would allow them to get away with that kind of thing during the RS. It's the same with the 90s Sonics (although their offense was better, they had the same tendency to break down in the playoffs) Thanks for the info btw, Outside. pretty interesting perspective on that team. one of the most compelling teams in history and a huge part of the 80s.

Not sure where I stand on D-Rob vs Chuck, huge flaws both ways...D-Rob's seem easier to deal with from a team perspective at first.
User avatar
Winsome Gerbil
RealGM
Posts: 15,021
And1: 13,091
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#16 » by Winsome Gerbil » Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:40 am

18) Chuck
19) Admiral

For the same reasons I have mentioned the last two threads. These guys were both virtuosos at their own areas, and actually I have them very close, closer to each other than I think either were to more limited guys like Dirk and Moses, who I would have after them.

But their portfolios were distinct and unique, and in the end the factors leading me to go Barkley > Admiral are 1) a factor I do care about, which is that Charles was not soft. He never backed down from a challenge. He was a "give me the damn ball and get the hell out of my way" goto guy par excellence; and 2) Charles had a longer prime as a #1 guy. Admiral only 7 years before he officially became a beta on his own teams; and 3) a factor that I normally use only late in an analysis: Charles was the much better playoff performer, for some of the reasons in 1), and some of the reasons in 2)...i.e. Admiral had a lot of his playoff success after receding to be Duncan's wingman.

Counterbalancing those factors of course is Admiral's defense, which belongs right up there with anybody's. It makes it close for me. But I just have a hard time putting a guy above Barkley who had the perception of softness about him, who maybe was TOO good at becoming somebody's else's wingman, maybe too happy to give up the franchise responsibility to another and just help out. In the end i want my great players to be great, to know they're great, and to want to inflict that greatness on their opponents' faces at every opportunity. These two guys are both marvelous talents, but it's the intangibles of toughness, gotoguyness, coming up big on the biggest stages, that provides just enough separation for me to go Chuck > Admiral.
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,101
And1: 17,744
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#17 » by scrabbarista » Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:54 am

18. Moses Malone

19. David Robinson


I. Malone and Robinson are the only two players remaining who have over 50,000 career pts, rebs, asts, stls, and blks in the regular season.

II. In my "Stats" category, which adds up the number of times a player was Top 5 in 18 or 19 differently weighted categories, Malone is 5th among remaining players. The players ahead of him - Gilmore, Stockton, Pettit, and Paul - clearly did not match his dominance (only Pettit even has an argument).

III. In my "MVP" metric, Robinson is second among remaining players to Bob Pettit. Malone is fourth, after Durant.

IV. Finally, in the category that, for me, epitomizes/defines greatness, Malone has one "Best on Champ" in his career.

Overall, I have Malone at 14th and Robinson at 17th.
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
User avatar
THKNKG
Pro Prospect
Posts: 994
And1: 368
Joined: Sep 11, 2016
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#18 » by THKNKG » Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:32 pm

Winsome Gerbil wrote:18) Chuck
19) Admiral

For the same reasons I have mentioned the last two threads. These guys were both virtuosos at their own areas, and actually I have them very close, closer to each other than I think either were to more limited guys like Dirk and Moses, who I would have after them.

But their portfolios were distinct and unique, and in the end the factors leading me to go Barkley > Admiral are 1) a factor I do care about, which is that Charles was not soft. He never backed down from a challenge. He was a "give me the damn ball and get the hell out of my way" goto guy par excellence; and 2) Charles had a longer prime as a #1 guy. Admiral only 7 years before he officially became a beta on his own teams; and 3) a factor that I normally use only late in an analysis: Charles was the much better playoff performer, for some of the reasons in 1), and some of the reasons in 2)...i.e. Admiral had a lot of his playoff success after receding to be Duncan's wingman.

Counterbalancing those factors of course is Admiral's defense, which belongs right up there with anybody's. It makes it close for me. But I just have a hard time putting a guy above Barkley who had the perception of softness about him, who maybe was TOO good at becoming somebody's else's wingman, maybe too happy to give up the franchise responsibility to another and just help out. In the end i want my great players to be great, to know they're great, and to want to inflict that greatness on their opponents' faces at every opportunity. These two guys are both marvelous talents, but it's the intangibles of toughness, gotoguyness, coming up big on the biggest stages, that provides just enough separation for me to go Chuck > Admiral.


How do Chuck's aloofness/motivation issues, and his partying/team issue stuff factor in to your analysis? In my mind, that kinda takes away some of the sheen of his being so "alpha."
All-Time Fantasy Draft Team (90 FGA)

PG: Maurice Cheeks / Giannis
SG: Reggie Miller / Jordan
SF: Michael Jordan / Bruce Bowen
PF: Giannis / Marvin Williams
C: Artis Gilmore / Chris Anderson
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,007
And1: 9,693
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#19 » by penbeast0 » Mon Jul 24, 2017 1:06 pm

Dr Positivity wrote:...

Case for Bob Pettit: Great playoff performer who proved it against the hardest of competition in the Celtics, infamously dropped 50 on them in a close out game. Has floor spacing value. Toughness/intangibles helps set stage. Continued to put up great stats into early 60s even at an older age, showing he likely wasn't less suited to his era than peers like West, Oscar, Baylor. Quality prime longevity as he comes in productive and keeps it up for a decade plus. Case against: Average defensive value at a big man position. Lacks virtually any post prime years to pad his longevity. His TS is good but more like +.3-.4 above average than the truly elite numbers players like West and Oscar posted compared to their eras. Scoring volume not as high as the raw stats say when you take into account pace. Overall Pettit scoring volume+efficiency combo is good, but more like prime Love than Barkley. Competition level is overall less impressive to dominate than other eras.
...

Vote David Robinson

2nd: Charles Barkley


Three things on Pettit. (1) Cant really mention the great playoff closeout to beat the Celtics without acknowledging that over the years of STL in the playoffs, Pettit had a dropoff most years while it was Cliff Hagan that generally picked up his playoff averages. Maybe due to more defensive focus, maybe just not a playoff stud generally, the great clutch effort in 58 does make a difference. (2) From what I have heard, his defense was good rather than average, "relentless" was the word used for his rebounding and defensive effort out there. On the flip side, asked his team to get a center so he could play forward because he felt he was getting too beat up playing the 5. (3) Pettit's efficiency in his prime years in the 50s was Oscar/West caliber. It was the 60s, when the league had changed that while his efficiency improved over the 50s, the NBA changed so fast that he was only slightly above average, around the Elgin Baylor level rather than the West/Robinson level, but if you look at his numbers from before 59, he and Neil Johnston were pretty dominant in efficiency.

Relative to Barkley. Pettit is comparable as a rebounder and volume scorer, not as efficient and in weaker era (50s . . . I believe the 60s were stronger era than the 80s due to concentration of talent), but Pettit brings consistent defensive effort and great leadership rather than poor defensive effort and party boy/locker room troublemaker so I have him above Barkley all-time. Not as high as Mikan who dominated the league to a much greater degree than either but next on the PF list. I would rather have Patrick Ewing or Kevin Durant than Barkley too in terms of bigs.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,599
And1: 24,920
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: RealGM 2017 Top 100 List: #18 

Post#20 » by 70sFan » Mon Jul 24, 2017 1:28 pm

Pettit had his second best rTS season in 1964. He wasn't really less efficient than in 1950s compared to league average. He always gave you over +4% rTS regadless of the season. I'd say he had his best seasons in 1960s. In my opinion 1963 season might be his peak. All 1959-61 seasons were amazing too.

I also don't think he's bad playoffs performer. He regressed slightly compared to RS but was still almost as efficient with similar volume. Given how many times he faced Celtics, I'd give him props for his overall production in playoffs. It's not a shame for being worse in some seasons than Cliff Hagan - Cliff is an all time great playoffs performer.

I agree with penbeast0 though. He was much better leader and defender than Barkley and I also have him higher than Chuck overall.

Return to Player Comparisons