Bynum vs. Shaq
Moderators: Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier, penbeast0, trex_8063, PaulieWal
-
Lakers05
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,098
- And1: 3
- Joined: Oct 31, 2005
For some reasons, people think points are everything, even though in order to gain the advantage in the point differential category, you've gotta dominate in the other categories first. I guess people think that if you replaced Bynum with Shaq, this team will somehow average 110 points whilst averaging only 37 rebounds per game.
-
Lakers05
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,098
- And1: 3
- Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Wade2k6 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Well if Bynum is clearly at Duncans level like you say he is, there should be NO reasons/excuses for Kobe to not win a title this year.
A Duncan/Kobe duo is clearly better then a Bynum/Kobe duo. You can't be serious. I'm hoping he's one of the few laker fans that thinks that.
Anyway, back to the question. Considering Bynum has stayed healthy and Shaq can't seem too, I'd probably go with Bynum.
Even though Bynum is injured right now, I'm willing to take that bet(hey, Bynum is not out for the season yet and it could work both ways). How about $100?