Karl Malone or Charles Barkley

Moderators: Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier, penbeast0, trex_8063, PaulieWal

Who was better?

a) Karl Malone
23
64%
b) Charles Barkley
13
36%
 
Total votes: 36

User avatar
superBlazerFan
Junior
Posts: 380
And1: 32
Joined: May 24, 2007
Location: oregon

 

Post#21 » by superBlazerFan » Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:10 am

Hard2dhole wrote:Malone Easy

your talking against a guy who was the mvp of the original dream team.. think who was on that team..
User avatar
candy for lunch
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,583
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 20, 2007

 

Post#22 » by candy for lunch » Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:17 am

Barkley didn't go out of his way to injure people (on the court, at least), so I'll go with him.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 28,495
And1: 8,715
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#23 » by penbeast0 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:14 pm

bballcool34 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I see Garnett or DeBusschere competing for a spot on that list after McHale.


Oooh, I forgot Garnett! He would rank 4th for me I think, moving to 3rd or even 2nd if he wins a championship. DeBusschere should definitely be on the top 10 but below McHale and in the mix with several others for the next spots.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
carrottop12
RealGM
Posts: 21,602
And1: 30
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: why you take out my sig for?

 

Post#24 » by carrottop12 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:39 pm

Malone was a more prolific scorer then Sir Charles. Also a better defender and he rarely hurt the team with his on the floor antics. The same cannot be said for Barkley.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 93,350
And1: 24,580
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#25 » by hermes » Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:51 pm

karl

Return to Player Comparisons