Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Moderators: dms269, Jamaaliver, HMFFL
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 50,137
- And1: 8,205
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
The Lakers’ best offer in any blockbuster trade looks somewhat similar, with the team able to offer their first-round pick in the year’s draft — No. 17 — in addition to first-round picks in 2029 and 2031. Their best young player, Austin Reaves, is still regarded highly within the organization on two fronts — as a prospect for their future and a player on a team-friendly contract. The team’s willingness to push all in on Mitchell or any other player is still unclear.
https://www.latimes.com/sports/lakers/story/2024-05-16/where-do-the-lakers-stand
Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM Forums mobile app
https://www.latimes.com/sports/lakers/story/2024-05-16/where-do-the-lakers-stand
Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 8,495
- And1: 1,572
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
One_and_Done wrote:So the Pels solve the problem of overpaying BI, who does fit their team, by overpaying Dejounte, who is a worse fit. Seems illogical.
How does DJM not fit their team? How is he an overpaid contract? He is going to average 27.5 Million for each of the next 3 seasons. It's gonna be hard to find an available point guard as good as he is for less.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- Jamaaliver
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 38,200
- And1: 14,694
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
- Contact:
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
dms269 wrote:BI is not more valuable than Murray right now. BI is on an expiring contract and wants a max or near max deal, which would be paying him almost double what Murray is schedule to make. I don't like the idea of BI on the Hawks (too much iso, lack of great defense, and worsening shooting), but teams that trade for him are either going to be overpaying him or gambling he will take less.
dms, the individual you're conversing with is not seeking serious debate or conversation.
Don't expect rational, well thought out responses.
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 50,137
- And1: 8,205
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
If we pursue a Mich smaller scale trade with New Orleans I would like for us to pursue Larry Nance Jr. Expiring after next season at $11m and change.
Early 30's and can be an excellent park off our bench if used properly.
Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM Forums mobile app
Early 30's and can be an excellent park off our bench if used properly.
Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM Forums mobile app
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,185
- And1: 12,013
- Joined: Mar 11, 2014
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 8,495
- And1: 1,572
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Only if he is super cheap or denver is adding assets. Injury risk, overpaid, crazy family.jayu70 wrote:
Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- Jamaaliver
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 38,200
- And1: 14,694
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
- Contact:
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Oooh boy.
We could only make this trade if Trae gives us some assurances that he's sticking around long term.
Fit wise: a Okongwu-Jalen-MPJ front court would cause serious mismatches...
I'm most resistant to give up Bogi. His impact is positive literally every time he's on the court.
Who would you guys then add at SG both starting and off the bench?
We could only make this trade if Trae gives us some assurances that he's sticking around long term.
Fit wise: a Okongwu-Jalen-MPJ front court would cause serious mismatches...
I'm most resistant to give up Bogi. His impact is positive literally every time he's on the court.
Who would you guys then add at SG both starting and off the bench?
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,483
- And1: 2,068
- Joined: May 23, 2015
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Jamaaliver wrote:Oooh boy.
We could only make this trade if Trae gives us some assurances that he's sticking around long term.
Fit wise: a Okongwu-Jalen-MPJ front court would cause serious mismatches...
I'm most resistant to give up Bogi. His impact is positive literally every time he's on the court.
Who would you guys then add at SG both starting and off the bench?
Like you said OOh boy. Too much risk for my blood. Rather look elsewhere
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- Jamaaliver
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 38,200
- And1: 14,694
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
- Contact:
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
tbhawksfan1 wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:Oooh boy.
We could only make this trade if Trae gives us some assurances that he's sticking around long term.
Fit wise: a Okongwu-Jalen-MPJ front court would cause serious mismatches...
Like you said OOh boy. Too much risk for my blood. Rather look elsewhere
Understandable. This is a move you make if you believe that MPJ has All Star scoring potential that Trae can unlock.
I will say that 3 years/$113 million in this new age of ridiculously high contracts isn't terrible if MPJ does hit.
I can definitely envision a Lauri Markkannen-type emergence with MPJ as a #2 option.
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,483
- And1: 2,068
- Joined: May 23, 2015
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Jamaaliver wrote:tbhawksfan1 wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:Oooh boy.
We could only make this trade if Trae gives us some assurances that he's sticking around long term.
Fit wise: a Okongwu-Jalen-MPJ front court would cause serious mismatches...
Like you said OOh boy. Too much risk for my blood. Rather look elsewhere
Understandable. This is a move you make if you believe that MPJ has All Star scoring potential that Trae can unlock.
I will say that 3 years/$113 million in this new age of ridiculously high contracts isn't terrible if MPJ does hit.
I can definitely envision a Lauri Markkannen-type emergence with MPJ as a #2 option.
I hear he's a very low IQ player and I know he's a big injury risk. Also the fact that he just stunk it up in the playoffs
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- Jamaaliver
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 38,200
- And1: 14,694
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
- Contact:
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
tbhawksfan1 wrote:I hear he's a very low IQ player and I know he's a big injury risk. Also the fact that he just stunk it up in the playoffs
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,185
- And1: 12,013
- Joined: Mar 11, 2014
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Jamaaliver wrote:tbhawksfan1 wrote:I hear he's a very low IQ player and I know he's a big injury risk. Also the fact that he just stunk it up in the playoffs
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- Geaux_Hawks
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,229
- And1: 1,014
- Joined: Feb 18, 2011
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Jamaaliver wrote:Oooh boy.
We could only make this trade if Trae gives us some assurances that he's sticking around long term.
Fit wise: a Okongwu-Jalen-MPJ front court would cause serious mismatches...
I'm most resistant to give up Bogi. His impact is positive literally every time he's on the court.
Who would you guys then add at SG both starting and off the bench?
Hear me out for a second or two. Trae, MPJ, JJ, Sarr, OO..... ... ... ....
A 6'10 SG?! Talk about size and versatility throughout the lineup around Trae.
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 8,495
- And1: 1,572
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Jamaaliver wrote:Oooh boy.
We could only make this trade if Trae gives us some assurances that he's sticking around long term.
Fit wise: a Okongwu-Jalen-MPJ front court would cause serious mismatches...
I'm most resistant to give up Bogi. His impact is positive literally every time he's on the court.
Who would you guys then add at SG both starting and off the bench?
No thanks. An overpaid major injury risk with a crazy family doesn't bode well.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 50,137
- And1: 8,205
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
MPJ is one player that Denver would possibly like to move because he's not consistent. He makes between 35 and 40 million per season and I don't believe he makes the impact to justify his contract. Imagine paying a guy that amount of money that is a teams third option. He's not a superstar.
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 50,137
- And1: 8,205
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
People should look at MPJ's salary and ask themselves is he going to be a champion without Jokic?
How things look he would need to be our second option.
How things look he would need to be our second option.
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 50,137
- And1: 8,205
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Geaux_Hawks wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:Oooh boy.
We could only make this trade if Trae gives us some assurances that he's sticking around long term.
Fit wise: a Okongwu-Jalen-MPJ front court would cause serious mismatches...
I'm most resistant to give up Bogi. His impact is positive literally every time he's on the court.
Who would you guys then add at SG both starting and off the bench?
Hear me out for a second or two. Trae, MPJ, JJ, Sarr, OO..... ... ... ....
A 6'10 SG?! Talk about size and versatility throughout the lineup around Trae.
Bog is undervalued. Put him on Denver and his value will be noticed. The guy is a winner ans his contract is good.
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- Jamaaliver
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 38,200
- And1: 14,694
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
- Contact:
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
HMFFL wrote:Bog is undervalued. Put him on Denver and his value will be noticed. The guy is a winner ans his contract is good.
For all of the flaws on this roster, we really do have some above average pieces on great contracts. (Bogdan and Okongwu especially)
I'd hate to see us throw those assets away on a gamble like MPJ or otherwise.
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
- Geaux_Hawks
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,229
- And1: 1,014
- Joined: Feb 18, 2011
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
HMFFL wrote:Geaux_Hawks wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:Oooh boy.
We could only make this trade if Trae gives us some assurances that he's sticking around long term.
Fit wise: a Okongwu-Jalen-MPJ front court would cause serious mismatches...
I'm most resistant to give up Bogi. His impact is positive literally every time he's on the court.
Who would you guys then add at SG both starting and off the bench?
Hear me out for a second or two. Trae, MPJ, JJ, Sarr, OO..... ... ... ....
A 6'10 SG?! Talk about size and versatility throughout the lineup around Trae.
Bog is undervalued. Put him on Denver and his value will be noticed. The guy is a winner ans his contract is good.
I think he's valuable as well. I do think a healthy MPJ would be more dynamic as a scorer. So maybe finding a different route to add MPJ?
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,621
- And1: 5,397
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
Re: Atlanta Hawks Trade Proposal Thread -- Part IV
Jamaaliver wrote:HMFFL wrote:Bog is undervalued. Put him on Denver and his value will be noticed. The guy is a winner ans his contract is good.
For all of the flaws on this roster, we really do have some above average pieces on great contracts. (Bogdan and Okongwu especially)
I'd hate to see us throw those assets away on a gamble like MPJ or otherwise.
Bogi is better than MPJ. Such a crap trade.
We aren't that far. I wish our fans would realize that