PandaKidd wrote:ATLHawksfan21 wrote:PandaKidd wrote:I dont think any rationale human being can say they wouldnt take Kyrie Irving over Teague. you gain 5 years of youth, and a better skillset to mold.
Im just saying Teague is making a case that a lot of us are taking notice.
Kyrie Irving would cost double the money, because he would be double the player. Hes that (potentially) good.
Teague will never be an All Star MVP
and he would play half the games that Teague would as well. Irving will never be an MVP either.
Teague will be an all-star next year if we stay healthy. Guarantee it
I truly hope so. Honestly.
Do you agree that Teague needs to develop a jumper? If he could add a pull up to his game, he would be virtually unguardable.
I would most certainly agree that Teague needs to work on his pull-up jumper. I don't see why you think it is impossible for him to do so though.
Teague's 3 pt shot improved greatly over the 2nd half of the season. He finished the last 3 months of the year with 3 pt %'s of 38.1%, 38.3% and 42.9%. That is a better 3 month span than any of the guys you listed earlier (Parker, Wall, Paul, Irving)
Teague also improved his FTA per game by 2 this season from last.
and this was with severe turnover throughout the roster and him being without his main pick and roll partner.
So why is it impossible for Teague to continue to improve again?