azuresou1 wrote:I think Levinson brought up some legitimate points in his e-mail about what drives revenues for NBA teams.
I agree. The e-mail is poorly worded, but contains basic points, questions, demographic info that is pretty common in market research. The issue is Levenson's recent condemning of Sterling, the NBA's new zero tolerance policy. If this had come to light in 2012, Bruce gets a fine, the story doesn't leave GA. It's forgotten in a few months. But in light of the Sterling drama in LA, the team absolutely had to distance itself. I commend Levenson for at least making the right decision and walking away willingly without making things worse. (Assuming it was his call.)
azuresou1 wrote:I don't think Ferry is getting fired based on the statements that have been made by the team. They mentioned an in-house private punishment, and Ferry's mentioned that he appreciates the support of the organization.
The concern here is that new ownership generally comes in with their own leadership team in mind. Considering Ferry's tenure here hasn't bore much fruit in terms of wins, fan excitement, or talent acquisition (plus his role in this whole racially tinged fiasco) I can't see a new owner wanting to keep him in the same post.
This doesn't even touch on the fact that black players will have a difficult time answering to DF knowing what type of sentiments he has said when they aren't around.
SideNOTE: You guys mind if we keep the Levenson talk in the other thread OK started? I intended this one to focus more on what the effects of new ownership might mean for the franchise in terms of personnel, draft strategy, player movement, etc.