Keep in mind that if Ainge trades #1 for #3, possibly LA Laker pick or Kings pick and teams that up with 2018 Brooklyn pick that's a huge offer for a big time player.
A Davis?
No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
- Celts17Pride
- RealGM
- Posts: 63,896
- And1: 62,965
- Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,937
- And1: 25,716
- Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
Some thoughts.
-- Red obviously did something like this. So it's not forbidden.
-- It could save a fire sale on some asset to clear max cap room.
-- None of us likes the idea of deconsolidation.
-- "What if the guy we want isn't there at 3?" isn't a concern. The trade doesn't have to be consummated until after that is known.
-- Trading down to get a guy who wouldn't work out for us sounds really odd.
-- I don't have any good reconsolidation ideas that would make this make sense -- just wild guesses that each are of very low individual probability.
-- Red obviously did something like this. So it's not forbidden.
-- It could save a fire sale on some asset to clear max cap room.
-- None of us likes the idea of deconsolidation.
-- "What if the guy we want isn't there at 3?" isn't a concern. The trade doesn't have to be consummated until after that is known.
-- Trading down to get a guy who wouldn't work out for us sounds really odd.
-- I don't have any good reconsolidation ideas that would make this make sense -- just wild guesses that each are of very low individual probability.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,355
- And1: 10,114
- Joined: Jun 12, 2009
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
CrowderKeg wrote:ParticleMan wrote:CrowderKeg wrote:
Can someone explain this to me??
where the hell are you going to play jackson, brown, crowder, and hayward? 3 for 2 spots is ok, but 4?
Maybe he's suggesting Cs are going after Griffin instead? Woike is an LA beat writer.
That's it exactly.
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,095
- And1: 22,438
- Joined: Jan 21, 2012
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
BigTrade92 wrote:zronv7 wrote:BigTrade92 wrote:
If it's his knee you draft him and let him rehab.
You didn't see Philly pass up Simmons because of a potential ding.
yea and look how Philly is as a team, Simmons hasn't even played a game yet
The status of the team has zero to do with the talent of the player.
And what if you can't rehab it? What if it's not fixable? You still want them to draft a guy who could Greg Oden us?
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 166
- And1: 119
- Joined: Jul 18, 2016
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
Leprechaun18 wrote:Danny has done stupid trade proposals before. We need to thank MJ for declining the wacko offer for Kaminsky. Danny is not smart and is over his head. He is just a jock from byu.
So all of the good moves (KG Trade, BKN Trade, IT Trade, etc.) don't count?
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
- Bar Fight
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,725
- And1: 15,886
- Joined: Sep 30, 2013
Re: No Longer Just Fultz-am and Jetsom: Celtics Hit the Big Time in the Draft. 2017 Draft thread 4.0.
A trade has not been made. I don't know why people are going at Ainge. If he makes one, we will unquestionably win it and make the Sixers look bad in the process. If not, we're taking Fultz.
One things for sure, people can't pretend that there is another as prospect valued/highly touted as Fultz. We have the number 2 and 3 teams in a bidding war for our pick.
One things for sure, people can't pretend that there is another as prospect valued/highly touted as Fultz. We have the number 2 and 3 teams in a bidding war for our pick.