Jermaine Dye vs Lance Berkman
Jermaine Dye vs Lance Berkman
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,977
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Jermaine Dye vs Lance Berkman
Who's having the worse season and who has the most potential to pick it up later on in the season?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,588
- And1: 327
- Joined: Mar 16, 2006
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,406
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 02, 2007
kobeSTOPkobeDONT wrote:Berkman is a far better player.
Dye is a better fielder with one of the best arms in the game. Berkman can play 4 positions. At the plate, I always liked Dye when healthy, but Berkman really hasn't had injury concerns
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
- bigboy1234
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,116
- And1: 7
- Joined: May 29, 2006
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,588
- And1: 327
- Joined: Mar 16, 2006
Actually, Berkman has had trouble staying healthy as well. I'm taking him because he is a far better hitter when healthy and far more consistent (.970 career OPS compared to Dye's .820). Dye had a huge year last year but it was kind of a fluke (only 1 other season in his career comes anywhere near that; 2000). He is still usually a pretty good hitter, but Berkman is a great hitter.34Celtic wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Dye is a better fielder with one of the best arms in the game. Berkman can play 4 positions. At the plate, I always liked Dye when healthy, but Berkman really hasn't had injury concerns
It really isn't close, Berkman >>>>>> Dye.
- sideshowking24
- Junior
- Posts: 396
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 06, 2007
- Location: Stillville
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,454
- And1: 5,326
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,588
- And1: 327
- Joined: Mar 16, 2006
Honestly, how can anyone argue that Dye is even remotely close to Berkman as a hitter (and player overall since the gap in hitting is so massive)? Dye is a pretty good hitter but far from a special or great hitter. He has a career .820 OPS, a .700 OPS this year and prior to last year he hadn't posted an OPS above .850 since he played half a season in Oakland.
Berkman on the other hand has a career .971 OPS, hasn't had an OPS under .927 in his entire career (it is at .842 this year, but he has been on fire and it'll get above .900) and is just a machine.
It isn't close. Dye is closer to Julio Lugo as a hitter than he is to Lance Berkman.
Yeah Jermaine Dye fans....I just went there.
Berkman on the other hand has a career .971 OPS, hasn't had an OPS under .927 in his entire career (it is at .842 this year, but he has been on fire and it'll get above .900) and is just a machine.
It isn't close. Dye is closer to Julio Lugo as a hitter than he is to Lance Berkman.
Yeah Jermaine Dye fans....I just went there.
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 52,226
- And1: 6,100
- Joined: Oct 31, 2004
- Location: Getting hit in the head
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,406
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 02, 2007
kobeSTOPkobeDONT wrote:Yeah Jermaine Dye fans....I just went there.
Now you're bordering on insane. Look at Dye's numbers when healthy and he's a legit stud. Lugo is throwup.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,588
- And1: 327
- Joined: Mar 16, 2006
I just went through his numbers and they clearly showed he isn't close to Berkman and that you are tossing the word "stud" out there far too easily. He has a career OPS is .820 and he hasn't been all that great aside from last year's huge season. A season in which he is making look more and more like a fluke each game.34Celtic wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Now you're bordering on insane. Look at Dye's numbers when healthy and he's a legit stud. Lugo is throwup.
I was never claiming that Dye and Lugo are close as hitters, but that comparison is about as valid as Dye/Berkman (i.e. not close). It was half joking, half serious.
Berkman>>>>>Dye>>>>Lugo.