ImageImageImageImage

Gammons: Sox decline Clay for V.Martinez

User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,087
And1: 14,099
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

Gammons: Sox decline Clay for V.Martinez 

Post#1 » by greenbeans » Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:42 pm

On the Adam LaRoche deal: The Red Sox have been searching for ways to upgrade their sliding offense for weeks. This deal has been on the table for three weeks, and after losing their fourth straight game on Tuesday and declining to trade Clay Buchholz for Victor Martinez, Theo Epstein took LaRoche.

http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/in ... mons_peter

That's a tough call right there.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,546
And1: 7,971
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: Gammons: Sox decline Clay for V.Martinez 

Post#2 » by Celtics_Champs » Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:30 am

Smart move. The only player on the market I want to trade Clay for is Doc.
JCizzle
Rookie
Posts: 1,088
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

Re: Gammons: Sox decline Clay for V.Martinez 

Post#3 » by JCizzle » Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:51 am

Whoa... very tough decision.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,744
And1: 228
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

Re: Gammons: Sox decline Clay for V.Martinez 

Post#4 » by sunshinekids99 » Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:12 am

Unless you have him in a package for Halladay (doubtful in that it's been reported that Riccardi is not high on Clay), I think you have to make this move. This allows you to get a huge bat you need and he would fit in with the Sox.

Martinez plays 3 games at catcher and 3 games at first a week. That allows Tek and Lowell to save their legs a bit and they bring in a better bat anyways.
Image

Return to Boston Red Sox