Official trade thread 2012-13
Moderators: Kilroy, TyCobb, Danny Darko
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Doormatt
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,438
- And1: 2,013
- Joined: Mar 07, 2011
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
didnt we have to go thru like a billion threads just a few months ago of boozer for gasol talk.
yeah that was awful i dont want to go back to that time.
yeah that was awful i dont want to go back to that time.
#doorgek
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,633
- And1: 2,926
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
since I'm getting bored
http://basketball.realgm.com/tradecheck ... de/6175799
we get a decent, reduced role 2/3 and 3/4 whose potential seems to be overestimated or has yet to be reached and they get a decent back up 1, a 3 they can definitely use, and a 5 that looks like their 5 and can potentially play like their 5.
http://basketball.realgm.com/tradecheck ... de/6175799
we get a decent, reduced role 2/3 and 3/4 whose potential seems to be overestimated or has yet to be reached and they get a decent back up 1, a 3 they can definitely use, and a 5 that looks like their 5 and can potentially play like their 5.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Doormatt
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,438
- And1: 2,013
- Joined: Mar 07, 2011
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
i see no reason for phoenix to do that. beasley and dudley might suck this year but at least one of them still have value to them.
#doorgek
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- EArl
- RealGM
- Posts: 49,774
- And1: 13,233
- Joined: Mar 14, 2012
- Location: Columbus
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
tugs wrote:since I'm getting bored
http://basketball.realgm.com/tradecheck ... de/6175799
we get a decent, reduced role 2/3 and 3/4 whose potential seems to be overestimated or has yet to be reached and they get a decent back up 1, a 3 they can definitely use, and a 5 that looks like their 5 and can potentially play like their 5.
I can see that working out. Having Beasley to start or back up Metta and change to the four when we want to go small.
Nash,Kobe,Metta, Beasley, Dwight could run the floor.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,633
- And1: 2,926
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
earl gets me
yep, and it's Dudley (basing on recent performances from the 2, Jared's producing consistently). I'm actually sold on Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks.
Doormatt wrote:i see no reason for phoenix to do that. beasley and dudley might suck this year but at least one of them still have value to them.
yep, and it's Dudley (basing on recent performances from the 2, Jared's producing consistently). I'm actually sold on Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Mirjalovic
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,053
- And1: 1,780
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
tugs wrote:earl gets meDoormatt wrote:i see no reason for phoenix to do that. beasley and dudley might suck this year but at least one of them still have value to them.
yep, and it's Dudley (basing on recent performances from the 2, Jared's producing consistently). I'm actually sold on Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks.
if we could get Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks its a non brainer.
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.
Sixers fans...
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- EArl
- RealGM
- Posts: 49,774
- And1: 13,233
- Joined: Mar 14, 2012
- Location: Columbus
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
That would be a steal, but I wonder if Phoenix is in to doing us favors since they gave us Nash.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Gek
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,024
- And1: 1,807
- Joined: Aug 12, 2004
- Contact:
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
I wonder if we could move Pau to Indiana. We could pick up David West (expiring I think), but other than some Sam Young D at SG, I'm not sure who we could realistically ask for back with Pau to make the salaries work.
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- pspot
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,850
- And1: 283
- Joined: Feb 24, 2005
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Kobe System wrote:
We are seeing that trade proposal for a million times now. We don't want Bargs. And hell no to Kleiza. Calderon is the only decent player that we are to received. If you wanna trade with us, Bargs/Jose/Ross should be the starting point.
would something around Jose for Hill and Duhon or Blake work?
nm
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 987
- And1: 500
- Joined: Dec 09, 2012
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Mirjalovic wrote:tugs wrote:earl gets meDoormatt wrote:i see no reason for phoenix to do that. beasley and dudley might suck this year but at least one of them still have value to them.
yep, and it's Dudley (basing on recent performances from the 2, Jared's producing consistently). I'm actually sold on Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks.
if we could get Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks its a non brainer.
Its a no brainer as in you DON't do it! Beasley has negative value on the basketball court. He is a terrible defensive player and just a streaky jump shooter on offense...that holds the ball and stalls ball movement. A big NO! The Lakers need defenders...and players that move the ball. Every team that gets Beasley immediately wants him gone.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Doormatt
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,438
- And1: 2,013
- Joined: Mar 07, 2011
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
seriously why would we want beasley? what about the lakers makes you think he will be an effective player? our players cant even play with intensity and effort every night and you expect us to get beasley to do that? wtf team are you guys watching.
#doorgek
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Doormatt
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,438
- And1: 2,013
- Joined: Mar 07, 2011
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
dudley on the other hand would be awesome, but again, i see no reason for the suns to trade him to us for trash.
#doorgek
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- Mirjalovic
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,053
- And1: 1,780
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
We almost had him back then if NBA allowed us to sign CP, i think he will flourish in a more mature team like the Lakers. Look at Blake, its doesnt matter if he plays or not, the Lakers still sucks, because since he injured , we cannot deal him atm. I dont wanna to argue though, we still can get better deals than Beasley, if we carefully wait & see the situation. Mitch has weakness, signing good/functional role players aint his strength, despite has ability to sign/trade stars. Should've cut Ebanks or another useless young guys who cannot produce in favour Pietrus.
Mitch can reedem that mistakes with Delonte West signing. Bipolar or not, hes our best bet on the bench, he can lead the 2nd unit together with Jamison & Hill. He will be our best creator from the bench.
Also, i think Lakers should be more patient with Pau, i heard Love slighty unhappy in Wolves, not like we can pull the trade easily, but Lakers could closely monitong the situation on there. Remember when Mitch turning down Bynum for Kidd trade ? Well, thats the turning point of Pau, Nash, Howard signing.
Mitch can reedem that mistakes with Delonte West signing. Bipolar or not, hes our best bet on the bench, he can lead the 2nd unit together with Jamison & Hill. He will be our best creator from the bench.
Also, i think Lakers should be more patient with Pau, i heard Love slighty unhappy in Wolves, not like we can pull the trade easily, but Lakers could closely monitong the situation on there. Remember when Mitch turning down Bynum for Kidd trade ? Well, thats the turning point of Pau, Nash, Howard signing.
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.
Sixers fans...
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,148
- And1: 14
- Joined: Nov 26, 2011
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
The suns have no reason to move Beasley 20 games into the new season when the whole team is struggling, and his contract doesn't hurt them because they still have cap space. But Beasley would do well in LA not because of the "veteran presence" but because of Norm Nixon. Also I do agree that hes playing poorly but hes also playing injured and has been moving the ball pretty well, just look at the game against the lakers he had 9 nice assists and could have had a couple more if the other players finished the play.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,044
- And1: 172
- Joined: Jul 06, 2004
- Contact:
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Question, would you guys consider trading Howard for Anderson Varejao? after watching last nights game, he seems like a better fit to D'Antoni's system.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 55,742
- And1: 21,679
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 33
- And1: 2
- Joined: Dec 11, 2012
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
Great news!!!!
Barg's is injured so it looks like the Lkakers FO has been saved from making another mistake
Barg's is injured so it looks like the Lkakers FO has been saved from making another mistake
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 55,742
- And1: 21,679
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
what was it about the lakers player movement this off-season/season that made u think the FO needed to be saved from a bad trade?
was it the horrible bynum for howard trade that the lakers are surely regretting?
was it the horrible bynum for howard trade that the lakers are surely regretting?
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,639
- And1: 6,513
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
dockingsched wrote::nonono:
well at least you can add that trade to your timeline.
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 33
- And1: 2
- Joined: Dec 11, 2012
Re: Official trade thread 2012-13
dockingsched wrote:what was it about the lakers player movement this off-season/season that made u think the FO needed to be saved from a bad trade?
was it the horrible bynum for howard trade that the lakers are surely regretting?
i think you misunderstood my point... i said a "mistake" not a trade
as for what have they done poorly... everything other than nash and D12 quite frankly
they missed out on a TON of FA's who signed for the minimum elsewhere in order to maintain roster spots for 4 scrubs DJO, Ebanks, Morris, Sacre
how would the lakers be playing if those spots were held by
blatche, barbosa, Pietrus, West?
I use those guys simply as examples... there are TONS of other vets who signed for the minimum who could help
The real problem is we accumulated ZERO bench assets this offseason KNOWING we had no picks we could deal during the season to improve the team...
what if we had signed a blatche for the minimum... wouldn't that have made hill expendable in a trade?
If Mitch and Jim had taken the approach the Nets did with their bench then we wouldn't be playing scrubs major minutes right now.
Bottom line, the FO got lazy after the two trades... nothing more nothing less