SAC/CLE/DET

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 40,958
And1: 14,081
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek

SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#1 » by Laimbeer » Sat Apr 5, 2014 2:21 pm

Ripped from another site.

Kings trade Thomas (s&t, 3y 20m), 2014 first round pick Kings (currently 7)
Kings get Irving

Cavs trade Irving, Deng (s&t, 3y 40m)
Cavs get Monroe (s&t, 4y 50m), Thomas (s&t), 2014 first round pick Kings

Pistons trade Monroe (s&t)
Pistons get Deng (s&t)
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 15,140
And1: 6,741
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#2 » by DowJones » Sat Apr 5, 2014 3:04 pm

If we are going to trade Irving (and I am for it) then it should be to blow everything up, not to add 2 decent players on new contracts. I would want to see a re-building package. Cleveland can try this re-building thing all over again with a nucleus of Thompson-Waiters-Bennett-2 Top-9 picks in a loaded draft.

I do like the idea of a Deng for Monroe trade if Cleveland keeps Irving. That could work.

PG: Kyrie Irving
SG: Dion Waiters
SF: Max-contract FA
PF: Tristan Thompson
C: Greg Monroe

That is an interesting team with a bench of Bennett, Jack, and Zeller. If you are LeBron, this is an interesting team to go to. Every single starter is 23 or younger and every single starter would be entering the prime of their careers as you turn 31/32. That is a good scenario to put yourself in.
User avatar
mcfly1204
General Manager
Posts: 8,999
And1: 1,840
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#3 » by mcfly1204 » Sat Apr 5, 2014 3:06 pm

If Cleveland was willing to let Deng go, why not just look to force Detroit's hand by making Monroe a sizable offer, while also retaining Irving? Plus, trades need to have reasoning included...
Well at least we're not Detroit!
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 15,140
And1: 6,741
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#4 » by DowJones » Sat Apr 5, 2014 3:12 pm

mcfly1204 wrote:If Cleveland was willing to let Deng go, why not just look to force Detroit's hand by making Monroe a sizable offer, while also retaining Irving? Plus, trades need to have reasoning included...


Because Detroit can wait and tie Cleveland's cap-space up until they make the decision to match or not. A sign and trade like that takes care of everything immediately.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#5 » by TheOUTLAW » Sat Apr 5, 2014 3:40 pm

Personally, I'm not a Monroe fan

If I'm giving up both cap space and Irving I want something better than this.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
User avatar
mcfly1204
General Manager
Posts: 8,999
And1: 1,840
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#6 » by mcfly1204 » Sat Apr 5, 2014 4:05 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:Personally, I'm not a Monroe fan

If I'm giving up both cap space and Irving I want something better than this.

As far as value is concerned, Cleveland would be better off resigning Hawes as opposed to paying Monroe's freight.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,478
And1: 3,246
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#7 » by blind prophet » Sat Apr 5, 2014 8:11 pm

No from Kings, and a hell not if Kings get top 3 pick.

We need a PG who can play some D, Cuz is not capable of holding the fort down consistently with both Mclemore and a poor D from pg position. It would help if we had a great defensive 4, or a SG that played D, but this is not an ideal situation for Irving I'm afraid.
lakerhater
General Manager
Posts: 9,481
And1: 1,887
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
 

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#8 » by lakerhater » Sat Apr 5, 2014 8:52 pm

Mods must be taking the morning off otherwise this would have been locked.

OP's laziness deserves a -1 if there were such a button. 1st he steals the deal from another site then he doesn't add reasons to it and still posts it on this board.
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,067
And1: 66,679
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#9 » by Dupp » Sat Apr 5, 2014 10:09 pm

Cavs laugh at this offer.
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,478
And1: 3,246
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#10 » by blind prophet » Sun Apr 6, 2014 1:32 am

Dupp wrote:Cavs laugh at this offer.


Yeah I don't think it is good for Cleveland or Sacramento.
User avatar
A_dub06
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,701
And1: 735
Joined: Dec 02, 2013
 

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#11 » by A_dub06 » Sun Apr 6, 2014 2:59 am

No way from detroit
OhioKingsFan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 905
And1: 92
Joined: Dec 27, 2007
 

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#12 » by OhioKingsFan » Mon Apr 7, 2014 5:40 pm

I'd do this from the Kings' perspective, though as others have said, I'd go in a different direction if I were the Cavs.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,645
And1: 32,205
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#13 » by jbk1234 » Mon Apr 7, 2014 6:00 pm

Laimbeer wrote:Ripped from another site.

Kings trade Thomas (s&t, 3y 20m), 2014 first round pick Kings (currently 7)
Kings get Irving

Cavs trade Irving, Deng (s&t, 3y 40m)
Cavs get Monroe (s&t, 4y 50m), Thomas (s&t), 2014 first round pick Kings

Pistons trade Monroe (s&t)
Pistons get Deng (s&t)


For this Cavs fan, you'd have to send Monroe and Irving out Sacramento and send back Thomas and Cousins to Cleveland (Sac could keep its pick).

Detroit would still get Deng.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
BossHoggin
General Manager
Posts: 8,169
And1: 571
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
 

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#14 » by BossHoggin » Mon Apr 7, 2014 10:39 pm

you guys need to start reporting trades with no reasons
Heat3Peat wrote:See this is why it's nice being a LeBron fan, no super hard allegiance to a team so there is no up and down emotions with me during a time like this.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,047
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: SAC/CLE/DET 

Post#15 » by loserX » Mon Apr 7, 2014 10:47 pm

Yep, sorry, all trades must include reasoning for all teams. Feel free to re-post.

Return to Trades and Transactions