dorkestra wrote:Covington and McConnell for Payne and ....
This package for Payne + filler is excellent value for OKC. Really like McConnell's price for the minutes requirement and flexible options with Oladipo.
Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe
dorkestra wrote:Covington and McConnell for Payne and ....
dbrandon wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Knight and Tucker for Kanter and Payne
Can we pull a third team in on this? Trying to figure out who. Knight is useful, but we're set at 2-guard. We need more competent swings, and I don't think Tucker will get the job done any more.
bondom34 wrote:Well after today the future looks more focused. OKC's likely out of free agency next year, so at this point trade seems the likely way to get a decent SF. Currently the depth is (early on so its still changing):
Westbrook/Payne/Christon
Oladipo/Morrow/Abrines
Roberson/Singler/Huestis
Sabonis/Ilyasova/Collison
Adams/Kanter/Lauvergne
The goal is to upgrade the SF, with the following on the table:
Kanter
Lauvergne
Ilyasova
Morrow
Huestis
and possibly Payne, but only if there's a truly good upgrade and a backup PG as well in return. Ideal targets would be guys like Chandler, Aminu, Matthews. Others in mind would be Tucker or Gay. Not sure of any others. Any interest/other ideas?
basketballwacko2 wrote:bondom34 wrote:Well after today the future looks more focused. OKC's likely out of free agency next year, so at this point trade seems the likely way to get a decent SF. Currently the depth is (early on so its still changing):
Westbrook/Payne/Christon
Oladipo/Morrow/Abrines
Roberson/Singler/Huestis
Sabonis/Ilyasova/Collison
Adams/Kanter/Lauvergne
The goal is to upgrade the SF, with the following on the table:
Kanter
Lauvergne
Ilyasova
Morrow
Huestis
and possibly Payne, but only if there's a truly good upgrade and a backup PG as well in return. Ideal targets would be guys like Chandler, Aminu, Matthews. Others in mind would be Tucker or Gay. Not sure of any others. Any interest/other ideas?
How about this:
Thunder receives CJ Miles and Rakeem Christmas for Andre Roberson and Anthony Morrow plus some future draft considerations.
Miles gives the Thunder a 3pt gunner big enough to play SF or SG if needed and can even play some PF, Christmas is a project kinda tearing up the D'League last season could be good down the road. The Pacers would love to have a big SG like Roberson to play some Defense. Monta moves to the 2nd unit and Morrow would add some shooting to the 2nd unit. I hate trading off CJ Miles so I'd like to get something more maybe a 2nd in 2019?
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Texas Chuck wrote:dbrandon wrote:
I think they might move on from the Jokic/Nurkic pairing at some point, since early returns on Jurkic haven't been promising. Too many good players and not enough minutes to go around. But any trade would likely have to be a 3-way.
yeah I don't think Nurkic/Jokic works as an on-court pairing well enough either. And assuming they value Jokic more, then I'd love to see them deal Nurkic rather than make him a lower minute backup. Feels like a waste of value.
Which makes me really want to re-visit my old Nurkic/Gallo to the Celtics idea with Jaylen Brown being part of the value going to the Nuggets because a young SF is something they lack and he would appear to be a good complement to Harris/Murray on the wing. And if a SF of the future comes in and Gallo goes out, then Chandler would be expendable for a team definitely playing for next year. Would Denver take a Ilyasova plus incentive deal for Chandler in a scenario like this? To go into next season with all those talented kids/picks and gobs of cap space? Try and package some of it for a star and then lure a guy or two to come there?
Meh too convoluted, but I've certainly played around with those ideas a few times.
basketballwacko2 wrote:bondom34 wrote:Well after today the future looks more focused. OKC's likely out of free agency next year, so at this point trade seems the likely way to get a decent SF. Currently the depth is (early on so its still changing):
Westbrook/Payne/Christon
Oladipo/Morrow/Abrines
Roberson/Singler/Huestis
Sabonis/Ilyasova/Collison
Adams/Kanter/Lauvergne
The goal is to upgrade the SF, with the following on the table:
Kanter
Lauvergne
Ilyasova
Morrow
Huestis
and possibly Payne, but only if there's a truly good upgrade and a backup PG as well in return. Ideal targets would be guys like Chandler, Aminu, Matthews. Others in mind would be Tucker or Gay. Not sure of any others. Any interest/other ideas?
How about this:
Thunder receives CJ Miles and Rakeem Christmas for Andre Roberson and Anthony Morrow plus some future draft considerations.
Miles gives the Thunder a 3pt gunner big enough to play SF or SG if needed and can even play some PF, Christmas is a project kinda tearing up the D'League last season could be good down the road. The Pacers would love to have a big SG like Roberson to play some Defense. Monta moves to the 2nd unit and Morrow would add some shooting to the 2nd unit. I hate trading off CJ Miles so I'd like to get something more maybe a 2nd in 2019?
stitches wrote:dbrandon wrote:Pillendreher wrote:
That would be spectacular for the Thunder.
I do this tomorrow and don't look back.
What if they changed Aminu for Harkless ?
Mystical Apples wrote:stitches wrote:dbrandon wrote:
I do this tomorrow and don't look back.
What if they changed Aminu for Harkless ?
I like Harkless' 3/4 ability for OKC too. If he shot better OKC wouldn't be able to acquire him. But it's fair $$ for the current skill/age with a chance to seriously outperform his contract with a little development.
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:Abrines
Kanter
2 seconds
for
Allen Crabbe
Makes too much sense for both sides.
nowyouknow wrote:Yeah, I don't think there is a chance that Denver is acquiring Jaylen Brown for an expiring Gallo and an average-good center prospect like Nurkic.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
dbrandon wrote:Can we pull a third team in on this? Trying to figure out who. Knight is useful, but we're set at 2-guard. We need more competent swings, and I don't think Tucker will get the job done any more.
Pillendreher wrote:Mhh. Intriguing. I don't know if I like Knight if I'm being honest. Everytime I see him play, he seems to be such a boneheaded player. He had one decent run with Milwaukee for 50 games and hasn't really been all that great since that 50 game-run.
dbrandon wrote:moocow007 wrote:You guys want Lance Thomas back?
YES
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
dbrandon wrote:
dbrandon wrote:Mystical Apples wrote:stitches wrote:What if they changed Aminu for Harkless ?
I like Harkless' 3/4 ability for OKC too. If he shot better OKC wouldn't be able to acquire him. But it's fair $$ for the current skill/age with a chance to seriously outperform his contract with a little development.
That's why I posted the BBRef comparison of him and Robes. Outside of Harkless being slightly better from outside (still bad) and probably a marginally more natural scorer, they're the same person.
Mystical Apples wrote:dbrandon wrote:dbrandon wrote:Mystical Apples wrote:
I like Harkless' 3/4 ability for OKC too. If he shot better OKC wouldn't be able to acquire him. But it's fair $$ for the current skill/age with a chance to seriously outperform his contract with a little development.
That's why I posted the BBRef comparison of him and Robes. Outside of Harkless being slightly better from outside (still bad) and probably a marginally more natural scorer, they're the same person.
You were saying about Harkless? OKC is speaking my language though with the 3/4 bridge and potential to develop into significant value.
And IMO this signifies OKC is looking into 2 wings....1 a possible LT answer (Grant) and 1 cheap-ish deep rotation wing for immediate shooting help.
FrontPageNews wrote:And they trade a protected first
Return to Trades and Transactions