Back again: Getting OKC a wing

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#81 » by Mystical Apples » Tue Nov 1, 2016 6:33 pm

dorkestra wrote:Covington and McConnell for Payne and ....


This package for Payne + filler is excellent value for OKC. Really like McConnell's price for the minutes requirement and flexible options with Oladipo.
geometry
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#82 » by Pillendreher » Tue Nov 1, 2016 6:34 pm

dbrandon wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:Knight and Tucker for Kanter and Payne


Can we pull a third team in on this? Trying to figure out who. Knight is useful, but we're set at 2-guard. We need more competent swings, and I don't think Tucker will get the job done any more.


Denver with Gallo?
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,386
And1: 7,513
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#83 » by jayjaysee » Tue Nov 1, 2016 6:37 pm

I think it should be Knight and Dudley not Tucker. Knight and Tucker for Kanter is closer than with Payne.

But I'd rather see it Tyson and Dudley without Payne, with a third team.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 21,916
And1: 4,304
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#84 » by basketballwacko2 » Tue Nov 1, 2016 6:38 pm

bondom34 wrote:Well after today the future looks more focused. OKC's likely out of free agency next year, so at this point trade seems the likely way to get a decent SF. Currently the depth is (early on so its still changing):

Westbrook/Payne/Christon
Oladipo/Morrow/Abrines
Roberson/Singler/Huestis
Sabonis/Ilyasova/Collison
Adams/Kanter/Lauvergne

The goal is to upgrade the SF, with the following on the table:
Kanter
Lauvergne
Ilyasova
Morrow
Huestis

and possibly Payne, but only if there's a truly good upgrade and a backup PG as well in return. Ideal targets would be guys like Chandler, Aminu, Matthews. Others in mind would be Tucker or Gay. Not sure of any others. Any interest/other ideas?



How about this:

Thunder receives CJ Miles and Rakeem Christmas for Andre Roberson and Anthony Morrow plus some future draft considerations.

Miles gives the Thunder a 3pt gunner big enough to play SF or SG if needed and can even play some PF, Christmas is a project kinda tearing up the D'League last season could be good down the road. The Pacers would love to have a big SG like Roberson to play some Defense. Monta moves to the 2nd unit and Morrow would add some shooting to the 2nd unit. I hate trading off CJ Miles so I'd like to get something more maybe a 2nd in 2019?
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#85 » by bondom34 » Tue Nov 1, 2016 6:39 pm

basketballwacko2 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Well after today the future looks more focused. OKC's likely out of free agency next year, so at this point trade seems the likely way to get a decent SF. Currently the depth is (early on so its still changing):

Westbrook/Payne/Christon
Oladipo/Morrow/Abrines
Roberson/Singler/Huestis
Sabonis/Ilyasova/Collison
Adams/Kanter/Lauvergne

The goal is to upgrade the SF, with the following on the table:
Kanter
Lauvergne
Ilyasova
Morrow
Huestis

and possibly Payne, but only if there's a truly good upgrade and a backup PG as well in return. Ideal targets would be guys like Chandler, Aminu, Matthews. Others in mind would be Tucker or Gay. Not sure of any others. Any interest/other ideas?



How about this:

Thunder receives CJ Miles and Rakeem Christmas for Andre Roberson and Anthony Morrow plus some future draft considerations.

Miles gives the Thunder a 3pt gunner big enough to play SF or SG if needed and can even play some PF, Christmas is a project kinda tearing up the D'League last season could be good down the road. The Pacers would love to have a big SG like Roberson to play some Defense. Monta moves to the 2nd unit and Morrow would add some shooting to the 2nd unit. I hate trading off CJ Miles so I'd like to get something more maybe a 2nd in 2019?

I'd keep Roberson over Miles. Adding Morrow for Christmas just makes it worse.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
nowyouknow
Junior
Posts: 341
And1: 88
Joined: Aug 27, 2016

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#86 » by nowyouknow » Tue Nov 1, 2016 6:40 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
I think they might move on from the Jokic/Nurkic pairing at some point, since early returns on Jurkic haven't been promising. Too many good players and not enough minutes to go around. But any trade would likely have to be a 3-way.



yeah I don't think Nurkic/Jokic works as an on-court pairing well enough either. And assuming they value Jokic more, then I'd love to see them deal Nurkic rather than make him a lower minute backup. Feels like a waste of value.

Which makes me really want to re-visit my old Nurkic/Gallo to the Celtics idea with Jaylen Brown being part of the value going to the Nuggets because a young SF is something they lack and he would appear to be a good complement to Harris/Murray on the wing. And if a SF of the future comes in and Gallo goes out, then Chandler would be expendable for a team definitely playing for next year. Would Denver take a Ilyasova plus incentive deal for Chandler in a scenario like this? To go into next season with all those talented kids/picks and gobs of cap space? Try and package some of it for a star and then lure a guy or two to come there?

Meh too convoluted, but I've certainly played around with those ideas a few times.


Yeah, I don't think there is a chance that Denver is acquiring Jaylen Brown for an expiring Gallo and an average-good center prospect like Nurkic.

I'm sure Ainge would be more than happy to work something out for that pair involving Olynyk, Yabusele and the 2018 Brooklyn pick.

But Brown is quickly making a case for being a potential franchise type player. At least he's showing the tools and personality to become that type of player. Doubtful the Celtics would look to pass on that without getting a true superstar or potential franchise player in return.

Gallo would be perfect in OKC. Maybe a three way deal where Kanter and Payne go someplace and then Denver gets a young wing.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,507
And1: 6,848
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#87 » by Andre Roberstan » Tue Nov 1, 2016 6:45 pm

basketballwacko2 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Well after today the future looks more focused. OKC's likely out of free agency next year, so at this point trade seems the likely way to get a decent SF. Currently the depth is (early on so its still changing):

Westbrook/Payne/Christon
Oladipo/Morrow/Abrines
Roberson/Singler/Huestis
Sabonis/Ilyasova/Collison
Adams/Kanter/Lauvergne

The goal is to upgrade the SF, with the following on the table:
Kanter
Lauvergne
Ilyasova
Morrow
Huestis

and possibly Payne, but only if there's a truly good upgrade and a backup PG as well in return. Ideal targets would be guys like Chandler, Aminu, Matthews. Others in mind would be Tucker or Gay. Not sure of any others. Any interest/other ideas?



How about this:

Thunder receives CJ Miles and Rakeem Christmas for Andre Roberson and Anthony Morrow plus some future draft considerations.

Miles gives the Thunder a 3pt gunner big enough to play SF or SG if needed and can even play some PF, Christmas is a project kinda tearing up the D'League last season could be good down the road. The Pacers would love to have a big SG like Roberson to play some Defense. Monta moves to the 2nd unit and Morrow would add some shooting to the 2nd unit. I hate trading off CJ Miles so I'd like to get something more maybe a 2nd in 2019?


MRW

Image

I don't mind Miles, but Miles and Christmas for Roberson and Morrow is bad value.
Image
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#88 » by Mystical Apples » Tue Nov 1, 2016 6:49 pm

stitches wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
That would be spectacular for the Thunder. 8-)


I do this tomorrow and don't look back.

What if they changed Aminu for Harkless ?


I like Harkless' 3/4 ability for OKC too. If he shot better OKC wouldn't be able to acquire him. But it's fair $$ for the current skill/age with a chance to seriously outperform his contract with a little development.
geometry
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,507
And1: 6,848
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#89 » by Andre Roberstan » Tue Nov 1, 2016 6:55 pm

Mystical Apples wrote:
stitches wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
I do this tomorrow and don't look back.

What if they changed Aminu for Harkless ?


I like Harkless' 3/4 ability for OKC too. If he shot better OKC wouldn't be able to acquire him. But it's fair $$ for the current skill/age with a chance to seriously outperform his contract with a little development.


That's why I posted the BBRef comparison of him and Robes. Outside of Harkless being slightly better from outside (still bad) and probably a marginally more natural scorer, they're the same person.
Image
BadWolf
General Manager
Posts: 8,923
And1: 3,424
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#90 » by BadWolf » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:02 pm

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:Abrines
Kanter
2 seconds

for

Allen Crabbe

Makes too much sense for both sides.


Kanter for Crabbe might make sense
Throw one of your bigs in for tht whole package, Ed Davis maybe
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,052
And1: 97,688
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#91 » by Texas Chuck » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:07 pm

nowyouknow wrote:Yeah, I don't think there is a chance that Denver is acquiring Jaylen Brown for an expiring Gallo and an average-good center prospect like Nurkic.




I would have Denver getting more than just Brown in that deal btw. I know you are personally really high on Brown and that's great, but I don't believe his value league-wide is quite that high at this point.

I don't know how to value that 2018 Nets pick. So hard to say if the Nuggets would prefer it to Brown. I'm guessing not?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,507
And1: 6,848
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#92 » by Andre Roberstan » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:19 pm

Read on Twitter


um

wat
Image
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 97,742
And1: 60,752
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#93 » by bwgood77 » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:20 pm

dbrandon wrote:Can we pull a third team in on this? Trying to figure out who. Knight is useful, but we're set at 2-guard. We need more competent swings, and I don't think Tucker will get the job done any more.


Pillendreher wrote:Mhh. Intriguing. I don't know if I like Knight if I'm being honest. Everytime I see him play, he seems to be such a boneheaded player. He had one decent run with Milwaukee for 50 games and hasn't really been all that great since that 50 game-run.


Knight could/would play more of a 6th man guy who can play a little pg but is more of a sg. I wouldn't mind leaving Payne out of it, and as a matter of fact, was going to but it seemed a little too much. I like Ulis at backup pg a lot. So how about Kanter/Morrow for Knight/Tucker?

Knight is the worst when he has high usage and that's kind of impossible playing with Russ.
When asked how Fascism starts, Bertrand Russell once said:
"First, they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent."
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,419
And1: 7,597
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#94 » by spearsy23 » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:24 pm

dbrandon wrote:
moocow007 wrote:You guys want Lance Thomas back?



YES

Seconded
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
QRich3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,844
And1: 3,947
Joined: Apr 03, 2011
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#95 » by QRich3 » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:26 pm

dbrandon wrote:
Read on Twitter


um

wat

Wow, they're doubling down on not caring about spacing. Depending on which pick they gave away it might be a good trade, Grant is a nice young defensive player. But boy who's gonna get any defender out of the paint for Westbrook to do his thing there?
Mystical Apples
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 06, 2015
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#96 » by Mystical Apples » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:26 pm

dbrandon wrote:
Read on Twitter


dbrandon wrote:
Mystical Apples wrote:
stitches wrote:What if they changed Aminu for Harkless ?


I like Harkless' 3/4 ability for OKC too. If he shot better OKC wouldn't be able to acquire him. But it's fair $$ for the current skill/age with a chance to seriously outperform his contract with a little development.


That's why I posted the BBRef comparison of him and Robes. Outside of Harkless being slightly better from outside (still bad) and probably a marginally more natural scorer, they're the same person.


You were saying about Harkless? OKC is speaking my language though with the 3/4 bridge and potential to develop into significant value.

And IMO this signifies OKC is looking into 2 wings....1 a possible LT answer (Grant) and 1 cheap-ish deep rotation wing for immediate shooting help.
geometry
DocRI
Starter
Posts: 2,126
And1: 764
Joined: Jun 17, 2010

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#97 » by DocRI » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:39 pm

dbrandon wrote:
Read on Twitter


um

wat


LMFAO!!!! Grant for Ersan and a conditional pick!

And the reason I'm laughing is just because I H-A-T-E-D Ersan when he was on my Pistons; if it weren't for Josh Smith, he would've easily been my least-favorite Piston since Charlie Villanueva. I was honestly stunned when the Thunder picked up his option and stayed quiet when most projected him as OKC's starting PF, but I knew that would never last. He's simply not good, an antiquated one-trick-pony of a stretch four who can't even perform that one trick well enough anymore and who is utterly incapable of shooting in rhythm / flow of a team offense (I swear, the man will literally pump fake on a free throw). I figured the Thunder would tire of him and ship him off at the deadline as an expiring, but it only took them THREE GAMES to have seen enough! And P.S., to back up this point — Rotoworld is speculating that the Sixers will cut Ersan.

The conditions on that pick are obviously vital to judging the deal, but so long as they're not substantial the Thunder just basically got a young swing forward for nothing.
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,507
And1: 6,848
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#98 » by Andre Roberstan » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:39 pm

Mystical Apples wrote:
dbrandon wrote:
Read on Twitter


dbrandon wrote:
Mystical Apples wrote:
I like Harkless' 3/4 ability for OKC too. If he shot better OKC wouldn't be able to acquire him. But it's fair $$ for the current skill/age with a chance to seriously outperform his contract with a little development.


That's why I posted the BBRef comparison of him and Robes. Outside of Harkless being slightly better from outside (still bad) and probably a marginally more natural scorer, they're the same person.


You were saying about Harkless? OKC is speaking my language though with the 3/4 bridge and potential to develop into significant value.

And IMO this signifies OKC is looking into 2 wings....1 a possible LT answer (Grant) and 1 cheap-ish deep rotation wing for immediate shooting help.


Nope. Robes is gone. I will bet all of my money forever.
Image
FrontPageNews
Starter
Posts: 2,092
And1: 1,474
Joined: Jun 20, 2015
 

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#99 » by FrontPageNews » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:41 pm

And they trade a protected first :lol:
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,507
And1: 6,848
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Back again: Getting OKC a wing 

Post#100 » by Andre Roberstan » Tue Nov 1, 2016 7:49 pm

FrontPageNews wrote:And they trade a protected first :lol:


Top 29. Thankfully.

This has to be a setup move. Just opened 7.1mil of space this year, got a Roberson replacement. Either offering DMo a deal (thanks Smitty) or picking up a larger contract.
Image

Return to Trades and Transactions