ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread Part XLVII

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,874
And1: 413
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1561 » by popper » Wed Dec 3, 2025 11:11 pm

I was pleased to see CK start at 2 before he was injured. He was outstanding IMO except for his average defense.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,504
And1: 2,149
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1562 » by Dark Faze » Thu Dec 4, 2025 2:42 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:Would anyone entertain Bilal for Jared McCain?

I don't feel particularly great about it but can see arguments for both sides...

Why do the Sixers make the trade? They need a defensive stopper?


It's a your trash for my trash kind of deal.

Both are players that have some potential to have value down the road but also have potential to lose a ton of value. I think Bilal's worst case scenario is a bit better than Jared's. He can still defend and has size and athleticism. Jared does absolutely nothing but score and is stuck behind two long term young starting guards. If he continues to look bad offensively, his value would be zero basically.

So for Philly: Get a player with similar boom/bust trajectory but at a position with more flexibility.
For us: Get a guy who showed a flash as a scoring guard.

It's a trade where you can see either side winning it or both sides just releasing both players at some point. Which is kind of the mark of a fair trade.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,975
And1: 9,296
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1563 » by payitforward » Thu Dec 4, 2025 3:34 pm

I'm not exactly ready to call Bilal "trash."
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,425
And1: 20,779
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1564 » by dckingsfan » Thu Dec 4, 2025 6:59 pm

Dark Faze wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
Dark Faze wrote:Would anyone entertain Bilal for Jared McCain?

I don't feel particularly great about it but can see arguments for both sides...

Why do the Sixers make the trade? They need a defensive stopper?

It's a your trash for my trash kind of deal.

Both are players that have some potential to have value down the road but also have potential to lose a ton of value. I think Bilal's worst case scenario is a bit better than Jared's. He can still defend and has size and athleticism. Jared does absolutely nothing but score and is stuck behind two long term young starting guards. If he continues to look bad offensively, his value would be zero basically.

So for Philly: Get a player with similar boom/bust trajectory but at a position with more flexibility.
For us: Get a guy who showed a flash as a scoring guard.

It's a trade where you can see either side winning it or both sides just releasing both players at some point. Which is kind of the mark of a fair trade.

Interesting and I see where you are coming from.

I would rather put my efforts into Tre and Riley. I think they have more upside (opinion) and McCain would kind of mung up the works.

Also, having a player like Bilal next to Tre and Riley is a "nicer" balance, IMO.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,504
And1: 2,149
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1565 » by Dark Faze » Yesterday 3:05 pm

Trash was too strong a word for sure. Project for project swap.

I agree that the more I think about it the less interested I am...but two weeks from now Jared might have a string of very strong games and change my mind lol. That's just how it is.

Return to Washington Wizards