Kilroy wrote:lakerRD wrote:Kilroy wrote:So the FO supposedly says "Zero Chance" AD is traded for KD... If that's true, it pretty much cements the idea that our FO is myopic and maybe a bit thick... Only reason I can think for that stance is because Klutch doesn't want him to go to Brooklyn... Does anybody think AD is actually better at basketball than KD? Better fit next to LeBron maybe on paper, but in reality, the AD/LeBron pairing has been mostly underwhelming...
So all factors considered, saying absolutely no to what amounts to a KD/AD swap, seems the height of idiocy, or dysfunction...
I read that too.
But there's another report that says NBA executives believe the Lakers would be interested in bringing both KD and Kyrie to LAL. If that report is true, it would almost for sure need both Russ and AD to be a part of the package.
I believe that the Lakers FO would pull that trigger if available.
How can this front office say no to a lineup that features LBJ/KD/Kyrie? They'd be complete imbeciles if they don't.
I just don think the Nets would ever do that. That would be a fail of epic proportions on the part of the Nets if they do that.
I just have a really hard time envisioning KD and LeBron playing together...
I hear you.
On paper, it seems like a good problem to have.
In reality, there would be no ball movement when KD and LBJ are on the floor together.
It's a wonder how Kerr was able to make it work with KD, Steph, and Klay on the floor together.
In that system, he had great spacing, Draymond as a floor general, and Steph who actually did move the ball around. Selfless players, who played within a great offensive system.
Not sure that can happen in a lineup with both KD and LBJ on the floor.