ImageImageImageImageImage

Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
stuporman
RealGM
Posts: 32,042
And1: 21,057
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Location: optimistic skeptical realist

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#461 » by stuporman » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:56 am

The media has noted how the Brunson signing isn't getting as much fanfare than I guess they think should be getting it while also simultaneously saying calm down Knicks fans it's only Brunson not LeBron.

Is it possible that Knick fans are tired of being told how they feel about what the team does? Getting told stories to reinforce the narrative the media wants that loves an angry Knicks fan clicks things so it's keeps them angry.

Awaken from the matrix
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
Image?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
User avatar
rickxdel
Senior
Posts: 686
And1: 773
Joined: May 29, 2021
 

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#462 » by rickxdel » Fri Jul 1, 2022 5:20 am

TheDavinciCHODE wrote:I'll just say what I've been sayin all along.

I like Brunson as a player. He's going to help this team a lot for sure. I don't mind paying that much, and it's probably not even an overpay in the modern NBA.

However, if this FO spent the last 3 seasons' worth of moves just to bring in Brunson while at the same time hurting our youth movement and losing the margins I'm going to be disappointed.

I think we can win ~45ish games if things break right for us. That's not what I want from this team though.

I really hope we get rid of randle this season. I just don't see a top 3 of Randle/Brunson/RJ getting us anywhere near where we want to go.

In the meantime, looking forward to see what Brunson can do with the keys to an offense.


Hopefully they're smart enough to trade Randle at any stretch where he is playing well and raising back his value
FREE PALESTINE
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,784
And1: 48,762
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#463 » by dakomish23 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 5:32 am

Read on Twitter


With all the hilariously bad contracts we’ve had, I found this shocking
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,784
And1: 48,762
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#464 » by dakomish23 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 5:34 am

Was listening to the KFTV show and I think it was JD who kept bringing up only one ball. RJ gonna have the ball in his hands a lot. Obviously Brunson.

So I’m wondering if the Knicks should be starting Obi & Grimes. Throw in Mitch and you have 3 guys out there who play off people and might max out the output from Brunson RJ. Plus that team could play fast.

Put Randle and Fournier on the bench with Cam Hart IQ.

Idk it seems like both 5 man units would be better fits.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,530
And1: 9,536
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#465 » by Oscirus » Fri Jul 1, 2022 5:43 am

stuporman wrote:The media has noted how the Brunson signing isn't getting as much fanfare than I guess they think should be getting it while also simultaneously saying calm down Knicks fans it's only Brunson not LeBron.

Is it possible that Knick fans are tired of being told how they feel about what the team does? Getting told stories to reinforce the narrative the media wants that loves an angry Knicks fan clicks things so it's keeps them angry.

Awaken from the matrix

I just saw some espn show that called this a bad signing merely cuz the knicks did it. Regardless of what we do it'll be seen as bad.

;t=180s
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
User avatar
Bob Ross
Head Coach
Posts: 6,127
And1: 7,517
Joined: Nov 28, 2011
   

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#466 » by Bob Ross » Fri Jul 1, 2022 5:50 am

Oscirus wrote:
stuporman wrote:The media has noted how the Brunson signing isn't getting as much fanfare than I guess they think should be getting it while also simultaneously saying calm down Knicks fans it's only Brunson not LeBron.

Is it possible that Knick fans are tired of being told how they feel about what the team does? Getting told stories to reinforce the narrative the media wants that loves an angry Knicks fan clicks things so it's keeps them angry.

Awaken from the matrix

I just saw some espn show that called this a bad signing merely cuz the knicks did it. Regardless of what we do it'll be seen as bad.

;t=180s


I heard that as well. They considered a good value contract and an asset for basically any team but the Knicks. Wtf
User avatar
Jstock12
RealGM
Posts: 11,057
And1: 17,879
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
 

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal 

Post#467 » by Jstock12 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 5:50 am

Chanel Bomber wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:This is a move in the right direction, young PG with advanced stats that say he can do a lot more.

Legit tough guy too. He's scrappy.

And not in a fake-tough/unhinged Reggie Bullock, Julius Randle against the Hawks kind of a way.


The Knicks version of Kyle Lowry
HopelessKnick
Analyst
Posts: 3,293
And1: 3,002
Joined: Aug 03, 2021

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#468 » by HopelessKnick » Fri Jul 1, 2022 6:44 am

This is the kind of move you make when you have a first option in place.

The positives of Brunson are that he has solid efficiency on offense and does not turn the ball over. He has also proved that he can be efficient:

a) without Luca
b) in the playoffs

I read some stats months ago that he is the best or among the best midrange shooters in the game and his 3-point shot is also rock solid. He has strong footwork and and a good floater. So overall on offense he is indeed pretty good.--not elite like Steph, Lillard etc. but still pretty good.

Negatives:

Defense---you'd think that he is tough and at least an above average defender, but he really isn't.
Athleticism---he is neither quick nor explosive, somewhat limiting him. I noticed during the playoffs that he had to work extremely hard for his shot.

Overall I'd say he is worth 4years/90mill. at max. so the Knicks overpaid. I think realistically he could average 22/8 throughout the season.

Overall grade: C (just for the fact that the Knicks haven't had a good, healthy starting calibur PG for ages).
HopelessKnick
Analyst
Posts: 3,293
And1: 3,002
Joined: Aug 03, 2021

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal 

Post#469 » by HopelessKnick » Fri Jul 1, 2022 7:17 am

Jstock12 wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:This is a move in the right direction, young PG with advanced stats that say he can do a lot more.

Legit tough guy too. He's scrappy.

And not in a fake-tough/unhinged Reggie Bullock, Julius Randle against the Hawks kind of a way.


The Knicks version of Kyle Lowry



Actually they do not have that much in common (size aside). Lowry in his younger years was quicker and more explosive but played also way more out of control. He was a worse shooter than Brunson as well. However Lowry was much better defensively.
User avatar
Jstock12
RealGM
Posts: 11,057
And1: 17,879
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
 

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal 

Post#470 » by Jstock12 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 7:39 am

HopelessKnick wrote:
Jstock12 wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:Legit tough guy too. He's scrappy.

And not in a fake-tough/unhinged Reggie Bullock, Julius Randle against the Hawks kind of a way.


The Knicks version of Kyle Lowry



Actually they do not have that much in common (size aside). Lowry in his younger years was quicker and more explosive but played also way more out of control. He was a worse shooter than Brunson as well. However Lowry was much better defensively.


Yeah I was more referring to their mentality I guess. Both have tough mindsets.
HopelessKnick
Analyst
Posts: 3,293
And1: 3,002
Joined: Aug 03, 2021

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal 

Post#471 » by HopelessKnick » Fri Jul 1, 2022 8:21 am

Jstock12 wrote:
HopelessKnick wrote:
Jstock12 wrote:
The Knicks version of Kyle Lowry



Actually they do not have that much in common (size aside). Lowry in his younger years was quicker and more explosive but played also way more out of control. He was a worse shooter than Brunson as well. However Lowry was much better defensively.


Yeah I was more referring to their mentality I guess. Both have tough mindsets.


Ah ok understood.

Don't get me wrong, I do like Brunson as a player and he seems like the unafraid, unintimidated type of player that won't crumble under pressure. Whether it is the right move, price at the right time remains to be seen.

Overall having a true, capable starting caliber PG that is a low turnover guy, solid playmaker and good shooter is very positive. He is also offensively a good fit next to Rose as he is accustomed to playing off ball as well.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$110m deal 

Post#472 » by HarthorneWingo » Fri Jul 1, 2022 8:21 am

Jstock12 wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:This is a move in the right direction, young PG with advanced stats that say he can do a lot more.

Legit tough guy too. He's scrappy.

And not in a fake-tough/unhinged Reggie Bullock, Julius Randle against the Hawks kind of a way.


The Knicks version of Kyle Lowry


Villanova
knicks94
Head Coach
Posts: 7,149
And1: 4,664
Joined: Apr 01, 2010

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#473 » by knicks94 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 8:35 am

Damn, Brunson must have read the Jerome James/Eddy Curry playbook on how to steal money from Dolan.
HopelessKnick
Analyst
Posts: 3,293
And1: 3,002
Joined: Aug 03, 2021

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#474 » by HopelessKnick » Fri Jul 1, 2022 8:56 am

knicks94 wrote:Damn, Brunson must have read the Jerome James/Eddy Curry playbook on how to steal money from Dolan.



I dislike Leon Rose and am no fan of this FO at all and fully agree that we overpaid. That being said the comparison to Jerome James is completely ridiculous. Curry had a lot of talent but was never interested in playing basketball unfortunately. Both those scenarios are completely different.
bearadonisdna
RealGM
Posts: 19,757
And1: 5,394
Joined: Jul 07, 2012

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#475 » by bearadonisdna » Fri Jul 1, 2022 9:10 am

Dallas board or our board not even talking about tampering ,
It’s just the GB , those dude got old man at clouds syndrome , they kinda washed up on direction of narratives.

Things were getting better but they reverted back quick , next thing you know shaq and Hakeem are gonna be better than wilt and bill Russ again and it ain’t even close
User avatar
Reign23
RealGM
Posts: 11,748
And1: 12,573
Joined: Dec 29, 2014
Location: Germany.
   

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#476 » by Reign23 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 9:33 am

I think Brunson is a top 6-7 value PG if you consider a)money b)skill c)age.
formerly known as knickst4pe
knicks94
Head Coach
Posts: 7,149
And1: 4,664
Joined: Apr 01, 2010

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#477 » by knicks94 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 9:48 am

HopelessKnick wrote:
knicks94 wrote:Damn, Brunson must have read the Jerome James/Eddy Curry playbook on how to steal money from Dolan.



I dislike Leon Rose and am no fan of this FO at all and fully agree that we overpaid. That being said the comparison to Jerome James is completely ridiculous. Curry had a lot of talent but was never interested in playing basketball unfortunately. Both those scenarios are completely different.
The comparison isn't to James/Curry and Brunson as players, but to how the Knicks seem to quickly open up their wallets whenever a player has a career year. I'm not saying that Brunson cannot be a productive player, but I am not fully convinced that this move will workout in the long run based on the track record of how this front office has done business for the past 20 years.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,044
And1: 95,978
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#478 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Jul 1, 2022 9:51 am

Brunson best Knick PG under the age of 30 since ?
Image
Adelheid
RealGM
Posts: 11,746
And1: 7,965
Joined: Jul 10, 2014
 

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#479 » by Adelheid » Fri Jul 1, 2022 9:55 am

since Marbury
HopelessKnick
Analyst
Posts: 3,293
And1: 3,002
Joined: Aug 03, 2021

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal 

Post#480 » by HopelessKnick » Fri Jul 1, 2022 10:07 am

knicks94 wrote:
HopelessKnick wrote:
knicks94 wrote:Damn, Brunson must have read the Jerome James/Eddy Curry playbook on how to steal money from Dolan.



I dislike Leon Rose and am no fan of this FO at all and fully agree that we overpaid. That being said the comparison to Jerome James is completely ridiculous. Curry had a lot of talent but was never interested in playing basketball unfortunately. Both those scenarios are completely different.
The comparison isn't to James/Curry and Brunson as players, but to how the Knicks seem to quickly open up their wallets whenever a player has a career year. I'm not saying that Brunson cannot be a productive player, but I am not fully convinced that this move will workout in the long run based on the track record of how this front office has done business for the past 20 years.


I understand this sentiment generally and I don't really endorse the signing. I do however think that in regards to Brunson some of the stuff that he provides are clearly not once-in-a-career-typ-outliers. He has always been rather efficient shooting and scoring the ball. He has always took care of the ball. He has improved his game over 4 years steadily and has a lot of skills and a good head on his sholders.

I'm with you generally that Knick FO has been terrible, but I'm pretty sure that the odds of Brunson dissapointing (in what he provides on the court) is generally low. Still overpaid some but it genuinely seems that the Knicks' organizational reputation is so terrible and bad that signing anything more than a 2nd/3rd option seems impossible. I personally would have gone the tanking route for a couple top 5 draft picks, just to be clear , but Brunson itself will be a solid player. He really is a good player, it is not some flukish bull run. He was even able to improve his output throughout the playoffs, which is actually rare, even for better players.

Return to New York Knicks